And that is the conclusion they will come too after they show up at your home. and have gone though every record for every photo you have filed and cross ref'd by url , producer, model name, stage name. and given them a cup of coffee after your done changing the pants you just shit and explained to the neighbor who the nice men in the black suits are.

Sorry Brad... These things sometimes just happen.

LOL, this could be a girl out for a fun day in the park with her friend who started a food fight. But, if its from an adult site...and if it's questionable to you, it will be to 'them' so have ass covered and have doc handy- just in case.

:1orglaugh

Could a food fight be deemed sexually explicit? Guess it all depends which food products and what she decides to do with it eh?

hey man, i never claimed i was a grammarologistic genius

Just stick to softcore and you won't have any problems.

Here's a pic of the Whole Gang!
http://ramos.adult.com/GFY-lapdog.jpg

Dude... that's one scary looking dog you got there. Does it bite?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

man.. you left me out again.. what the fuck

http://ramos.adult.com/GFY-lapdog.jpg

BwaHahahahaha!!!!!!

You know sometimes I miss being one of the gang :(

You'll always be one of the gang bro!!! :thumbsup

Agreed but what about the original SET?

If you use the first softcore pic but the set is hardcore - what then?

It seems no one can agree on this one.

<Armchair laywers discuss>

ooohhh.. I sure do have legal advise, and they told me to not waste my time with it. We are based in denmark, we host in danmark, and most of our stuff is in danish - so it does not really apply to us, unless our partners requier it. That is why I have it writing from all our major partners, if it apply to our joint venture, or not...

And if you go back to the beginnig of all thise 2257 post, I was one of theose that said "get proff help" and i still do...

but I do take et VERY seriously, even if it does not look like it.

I'm a sick fuck. Didn't you know?

^^^^^^

retard

^^^^^^^^^
Why?

http://www.profuzion.com/caution.jpg
On thin ice...

the way it was explained to me, it is a picture by picture basis....

if you have 500 pictures, starting with clothed and slowly working from softcore to hardcore, and you only use the softcore pics...then technically it isn't a hardcore set standing from what you published

i was totally stunned reading this thread - really BAD turn in here.

:1orglaugh @ :offtopic :angrysoap

No, all it does is follow you around and try to hump your leg.

It's about as worthless as it's owner.

fuck dude, you just caused the cola im drinking go out thru my nose!

thats a good one - you made my day

:helpme


:helpme

no its not compliant.. in my opinion.. and I doubt you would find an attorney willing to state that either for fear possible litigation telling you it is. The attorneys dont know themselves yet. So they arent giving out any catergorical advice. Right now they are speaking in parables so if you get pinched they have an out. Unfortunatley we will need more clarification from the doj or some prosecutions to explain it further.

Duke

That is just wrong!

Mitch

huh ????

ouch....

Just out of curiosity... have you ever even met this dog?

I'm not going to go back to find the original wording relating to this specific point, but it is transparently obvious (and one of the first points my lawyer made) that the intent of the new rules is to ensure that minors are not involved in porn productions. Given that, the key must be the whole photo set and in fact, the whole photo session.

Chance your luck if you like, but in practical terms, selecting softcore pics from a hardcore photoset is no different than cropping a softcore area from a hardcore pic.

Depressingly it seems that several sponsors are already forgetting even the most liberal interpretations. A list of FHG's I got from nubiles.net a couple of days ago was typical of several: although they were all what we might think of as softcore, every single gallery included at least one picture in which the model was plainly touching her genitals. And there was a guy on here today promoting some really excellent galleries, but among all his samples, I couldn't find any which would not require me to have 2257 docs, unless I only used text linking.

I guess it's up to sponsors and submitters if they don't mind limiting themselves to text-only and non-US TGP's, etc. But I also suspect that a lot of free-site operators are likely not noticing the drift back and could get into trouble down the road.