Is it a good thing that 2257 isn't in mainstream press? - GoFuckYourself.com

V_RocKs · 06-08-2005, 01:14 PM

Only about 2 weeks until 2257 is instituted and it still hasn't hit mainstream press like the original 2257 did.

Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

Would people come out against it? Possibly give money to the FSC to fight it if it was in the mainstream press?

Is anyone informing their surfers (say, on a TGP or other secondary production) that they are about to get a lot less porn then they were before? Or atleast a lot less graphic porn in thumbnails?

Probono · 06-08-2005, 01:30 PM

No one outside of the people it effect will care. After all it is just a new set of rules to save the children.

Shooting_Manic · 06-08-2005, 01:32 PM

It was here as well as the .xxx thing on the local news last night. The 2257 ran on the local new two weeks or so ago.

fireorange · 06-08-2005, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

Is anyone informing their surfers (say, on a TGP or other secondary production) that they are about to get a lot less porn then they were before? Or atleast a lot less graphic porn in thumbnails?

Lot that's a good thing if you think about it

Mr.Fiction · 06-08-2005, 02:32 PM

If the press picks it up they will probably say that pornographers are fighting against an anti-child porn law.

The media will try to make adult look bad no matter what.

06-08-2005, 01:14 PM	#1
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,409	Is it a good thing that 2257 isn't in mainstream press? Only about 2 weeks until 2257 is instituted and it still hasn't hit mainstream press like the original 2257 did. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Would people come out against it? Possibly give money to the FSC to fight it if it was in the mainstream press? Is anyone informing their surfers (say, on a TGP or other secondary production) that they are about to get a lot less porn then they were before? Or atleast a lot less graphic porn in thumbnails?

06-08-2005, 01:32 PM	#3
Shooting_Manic Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: NY Posts: 1,740	It was here as well as the .xxx thing on the local news last night. The 2257 ran on the local new two weeks or so ago. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

06-08-2005, 02:32 PM	#5
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	If the press picks it up they will probably say that pornographers are fighting against an anti-child porn law. The media will try to make adult look bad no matter what. __________________ Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU \| Free Speech Coalition \| EFF \| IMPA

06-08-2005, 01:30 PM	#2
Probono Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Under the Rainbow Posts: 2,731	No one outside of the people it effect will care. After all it is just a new set of rules to save the children.