GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What is with sponsors leaving non-US affiliates high & dry re:2257? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=478262)

SetTheWorldonFire 06-08-2005 01:34 PM

This whole industry needs to comply, US or NON-US.

It cleans everything up and conversions will be better :thumbsup

exportyourbiz-com 06-08-2005 01:35 PM

I'll state again what I've said in a few other threads..

I hold absolutely NO animosity towards program owners that are making these decisions because they see it as the best legal position to take in order to protect themselves, their models & their affiliates.

It's the guys inconveniencing hundreds of foreign webmasters in the name of 'not leaving their US affiliates at a competitive disadvantage' that irk me.

Joesho 06-08-2005 01:38 PM

I will gladly take your Traffic, we are completely out of the USA including processing for a few of our sites, if you are interested and you are wanting some of our stuff to promote out of the USA please feel free to hit me up anytime
174842541

Shap 06-08-2005 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exportyourbiz-com
I'll state again what I've said in a few other threads..

I hold absolutely NO animosity towards program owners that are making these decisions because they see it as the best legal position to take in order to protect themselves, their models & their affiliates.

It's the guys inconveniencing hundreds of foreign webmasters in the name of 'not leaving their US affiliates at a competitive disadvantage' that irk me.

It's not about screwing the foreign webmasters. It's about complying to the law. All affiliates of a company must comply. If I get traffic from an affliate that isn't complying I can be liable and my ass is in trouble. Read Steve Lightspeed's thread if he has affiliates breaking the TOS and he knows about it his ass could be in trouble. They will go for the money line.

Extreme John 06-08-2005 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
It's not about screwing the foreign webmasters. It's about complying to the law. All affiliates of a company must comply. If I get traffic from an affliate that isn't complying I can be liable and my ass is in trouble. Read Steve Lightspeed's thread if he has affiliates breaking the TOS and he knows about it his ass could be in trouble. They will go for the money line.

Exactly, people dont realize that guys like Steve, Shap many others and including myself didnt just jump up and say "Hey let's screw everyone", we are forced to make decisions based on a Legal system, and fall into a much different bracket because of the fact that we have affiliates, affiliates who must do the right thing when asked to. It goes hand in hand with being paid on time and all the others responsabilities we take on when opening an affiliate program. Not every decision we make is based on our own choices, or personal views.

GatorB 06-08-2005 03:42 PM

Quit whining already. Most sponsors that have post have said they will longer give out FREE hardcore content to use. Most have NOT said YOU personally can't BUY your own content and use that. So in other words what you are REALLY whining about is you no longer get a free ride and now have to PAY for your own content.

FilthyRob 06-08-2005 03:52 PM

This was a good reading thread

crockett 06-08-2005 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exportyourbiz-com
2257 says nothing about affiliates, it's the relationship between primary & secondary producer that has legal ramifications. Not everybody uses free content.

And even then it only says that the primary producer is responsible for producing the records for the secondary, not that they have to enforce compliance and inspect the secondary's records.

Dude you don't seem to want to hear the answer, so the best I can tell you is just keep complaining, I'm sure it will change things [/sarcasm]. 2257 Most certainly states that if you plan on selling your shit in the US then you must abide by the rules. If you don't want to follow the rules then block all your US traffic and only use non US sponsors, it's that simple.

Tempest 06-08-2005 04:46 PM

I remember the days (not so long ago) when there was no such thing as FHGs and content supplied by the sponsors... You bought your own.. or if you could "prove" yourself, the sponsor would let you use content from inside the site.... ahhhhhhh.. those were the days...

toddler 06-08-2005 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exportyourbiz-com
I wasn't laughing at anybody. Just stating that the conspiracy bit is foggy at best and not explicity laid out, hence 'weak'.


Congratulations, you learned about law.

chadglni 06-08-2005 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exportyourbiz-com
Why in the hell should that be for a PROGRAM OWNER to decide?

I paid for the content, I pay for the hosting... this is going too far with some programs. When it's either 'spend countless hours needlessly modifying 1000's of old sites' or 'spend 5 minutes to find a new non-US friendly sponsor' the choice is clear.

Marketshare will be won & lost on small points like this.

Look guy, you can keep on and on about this but you aren't changing any sponsors mind. Do you think they haven't spoken to their lawyers specifically about this? Do you think they just said fuck it, we'll try to lose some affiliates today? You can bet your ass that they are following legal advice that they paid top dollar for to stay in compliance with the law.

What if a non US webmaster posts hardcore content on a domain with no whois info? What if they change the whois info to the sponsors name? Who do you think is going to be called when there is a problem.

No matter how much you complain US sponsors will do as suggested by their lawyers. Better safe than sorry.

exportyourbiz-com 06-08-2005 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Quit whining already. Most sponsors that have post have said they will longer give out FREE hardcore content to use. Most have NOT said YOU personally can't BUY your own content and use that. So in other words what you are REALLY whining about is you no longer get a free ride and now have to PAY for your own content.

I've always paid for my own content. And I don't submit galleries/FHG/whatever.

exportyourbiz-com 06-08-2005 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni
Look guy, you can keep on and on about this but you aren't changing any sponsors mind. Do you think they haven't spoken to their lawyers specifically about this? Do you think they just said fuck it, we'll try to lose some affiliates today? You can bet your ass that they are following legal advice that they paid top dollar for to stay in compliance with the law.

What if a non US webmaster posts hardcore content on a domain with no whois info? What if they change the whois info to the sponsors name? Who do you think is going to be called when there is a problem.

No matter how much you complain US sponsors will do as suggested by their lawyers. Better safe than sorry.

and again....

I hold absolutely NO animosity towards program owners that are making these decisions because they see it as the best legal position to take in order to protect themselves, their models & their affiliates.

It's the guys inconveniencing hundreds of foreign webmasters in the name of 'not leaving their US affiliates at a competitive disadvantage' that irk me.


I don't want anybody to risk jail-time unnecessarily.

studio 06-08-2005 10:07 PM

I guess the scum of the industry will rise to the top...

GatorB 06-08-2005 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exportyourbiz-com
I've always paid for my own content. And I don't submit galleries/FHG/whatever.

Then why are you complaining about the supposed unfairness to non-US webmasters?

solonline 06-08-2005 10:14 PM

Well as for us its no change for EU webmasters - hard core - softcore - dont matter its biz as usuall. :thumbsup

exportyourbiz-com 06-08-2005 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Then why are you complaining about the supposed unfairness to non-US webmasters?

Because I'm not just looking out for my own best interests. Many non-US affiliates DO use the free content & free-hosted galleries supplied to them. They should have a voice.

On a personal level, I benefit from every sponsor that makes affiliates retroactively go back & change their pages, that doesn't mean I like to see it happen.

My business also benefits each time a US affiliate or US sponsor gets thrown in jail or has to go through a lengthy trial in both the courts of law and the courts of public opinion, that doesn't mean I like to see it happen.

You should try it sometime instead of your 'I would never use any sponsor that put [me] at a competitive disadvantage' position from the LS thread.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123