Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 06-06-2005, 11:00 AM   #1
FleshJoe2005
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 287
2257 exempt content --> still required to keep records?

OK, I can't believe what some people are saying:

Even if you have only content that is 2257 exempt, these people are saying that you STILL need to have the 2257 records. I say bollocks. Who is right?
FleshJoe2005 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 11:14 AM   #2
SGS
Confirmed User
 
SGS's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mallorca - Nottingham
Posts: 5,176
Keeping good records has always been good business long before 2257 came along.
__________________
See sig...
SGS is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 11:18 AM   #3
FilthyRob
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anaheim - CA
Posts: 6,741
I was wondering that too.
__________________
AKA - Clubsexy
FilthyRob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 11:26 AM   #4
FleshJoe2005
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGS
Keeping good records has always been good business long before 2257 came along.
I'm a secondary producer according to the new rules. I never had a single shred of docs.
FleshJoe2005 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 11:28 AM   #5
Gawdy
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGS
Keeping good records has always been good business long before 2257 came along.
Certainly makes it easier when new and different regs come along
__________________
hello
Gawdy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 12:09 PM   #6
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
OK, I can't believe what some people are saying:

Even if you have only content that is 2257 exempt, these people are saying that you STILL need to have the 2257 records. I say bollocks. Who is right?
If the content is exempt, you do not have to follow the regulations. However, if you are running a porn site, it would be best to have some documentation from your content providers to show that your models are over 18.
__________________
Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 12:12 PM   #7
NTSS
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Da Hood
Posts: 5,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleshJoe2005
OK, I can't believe what some people are saying:

Even if you have only content that is 2257 exempt, these people are saying that you STILL need to have the 2257 records. I say bollocks. Who is right?
If it's exempt...then doesn't that mean you don't have to keep records?...
__________________
ICQ: 150-803-430
Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net
NTSS is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 01:27 PM   #8
toonces
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: #1 target in the free world
Posts: 453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
If the content is exempt, you do not have to follow the regulations. However, if you are running a porn site, it would be best to have some documentation from your content providers to show that your models are over 18.

What makes it exempt?
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
toonces is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 01:31 PM   #9
BoyAlley
So Fucking Gay
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,714
If you have content that is "Exempt" because of date of production, and you're not the primary producer, you need a notarized letter from the primary producer stating that it is exempt.

So, in a way, yes, you still need to have records.

Fun stuff, huh?
BoyAlley is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 02:39 PM   #10
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by toonces
What makes it exempt?
If it is not "sexually explicit" as defined, then you don't need 2257.

Isn't this concept pretty obvious? The law only applies to certain types of content.

Do some of you think that MTV will now have to have 2257 for all of their live spring break coverage?
__________________
Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

Last edited by Mr.Fiction; 06-06-2005 at 02:41 PM..
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 02:48 PM   #11
chase
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 6,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoyAlley
If you have content that is "Exempt" because of date of production, and you're not the primary producer, you need a notarized letter from the primary producer stating that it is exempt.

So, in a way, yes, you still need to have records.

Fun stuff, huh?
So if you are the primary AND secondary producers, (and the comments clearly state one can be both-not that just the primary rules apply), do you have to keep your own notarized statement of exemption?
__________________
Need Hosting? Reality Check Network services me purrrfectly!
chase is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 02:51 PM   #12
taibo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,720
bollocks lol
taibo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 03:59 PM   #13
3piece chicken Dinner
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On your plate
Posts: 1,065
2257 in itself is a record keeping section of the law. If 2257 does not apply to the content your using.................................... finish this statement yourself people.
3piece chicken Dinner is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.