Sony F828

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lester
    Confirmed User
    • Sep 2003
    • 468

    #1

    Sony F828

    Who's got one?

    I recently have been given one to play with....

    Do you have an external flash to use with it?
    Which one?
    How do you like using the external flash with the Sony F828 for "amateur type" photos.
    (I know the built in flash is sorta sucky for most use)

    The camera works well with my studio strobes but I need a more portable solution.

    BTW
    Wireless sync is awesome with studio strobes.
    Just got one recently and it's way cool.


    onward
    I have no sig...sigh
  • GUNNER
    Confirmed User
    • May 2001
    • 2114

    #2
    I've got one and use it with the bult-in flash, which does kinda suck, but the external sony flash sucks just as bad.

    It's a great camera, colors are awesome.
    gunner @tutamail.com
    25 years in the jizz biz

    Comment

    • pubenemy
      Confirmed User
      • May 2004
      • 990

      #3
      I use the sony hvl-f32x flash. And the lumiquest pro max system which is a combination bounce/softbox type. Works pretty good.
      ICQ: 22-920-445 Aim: OGpubenemy

      Comment

      • Lester
        Confirmed User
        • Sep 2003
        • 468

        #4
        Originally posted by GUNNER
        I've got one and use it with the bult-in flash, which does kinda suck, but the external sony flash sucks just as bad.

        It's a great camera, colors are awesome.

        Hey Gunner....

        dumb question, and I think I sorta know my answer ....

        Snap a photo of one of my cats with the built in flash..
        Looks awesome in the image replay on the F828 screen
        Life seems good
        Open up same image in Photoshop
        whoa
        way way dark
        play with levels a bit and i'm a-ok again

        What gives???
        My PC monitor can't be that wacked out. Sites and content look fine.
        Photoshop seems to be a-ok

        I know I shouldn't rely on the F828's screen as the end all sign of success, but I'd think the two would match up a bit closer when I look at an image either way, or whats the point of viewing what's just been shot with the F828 ?

        Me and something I'm doing??
        or thats just the way it is.....

        thanks again.
        I have no sig...sigh

        Comment

        • Silicon
          Registered User
          • Dec 2004
          • 91

          #5
          i got an f828, it takes wonderful pics out of the box. also have a HVL-1000 flash. really good external flash IMO, about $120. Lasts for about 500 shots , 4 AA batteries.

          post a pic of your bad pic and then we can see what your doing wrong. maybe its just a bad device?

          Comment

          • taibo
            Confirmed User
            • May 2005
            • 3720

            #6
            this thread is pointless without pics

            Comment

            • Lester
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2003
              • 468

              #7
              Originally posted by Silicon
              i got an f828, it takes wonderful pics out of the box. also have a HVL-1000 flash. really good external flash IMO, about $120. Lasts for about 500 shots , 4 AA batteries.

              post a pic of your bad pic and then we can see what your doing wrong. maybe its just a bad device?

              quick photoshop combo

              Top is what opens up in photoshop with no modifications

              Bottom is a representation of what I see in the F828 LCD screen if I look at what I just shot

              I have no sig...sigh

              Comment

              • woj
                <&(©¿©)&>
                • Jul 2002
                • 47882

                #8
                Originally posted by Lester
                Hey Gunner....

                dumb question, and I think I sorta know my answer ....

                Snap a photo of one of my cats with the built in flash..
                Looks awesome in the image replay on the F828 screen
                Life seems good
                Open up same image in Photoshop
                whoa
                way way dark
                play with levels a bit and i'm a-ok again

                What gives???
                My PC monitor can't be that wacked out. Sites and content look fine.
                Photoshop seems to be a-ok

                I know I shouldn't rely on the F828's screen as the end all sign of success, but I'd think the two would match up a bit closer when I look at an image either way, or whats the point of viewing what's just been shot with the F828 ?

                Me and something I'm doing??
                or thats just the way it is.....

                thanks again.
                Look at the histogram (not sure if F828 displays it) The camera probably underexposes some pics, so you may want to up the Exposure Compensation +1/3 or more for those pics...
                Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
                Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
                Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

                Comment

                • GUNNER
                  Confirmed User
                  • May 2001
                  • 2114

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Lester
                  Hey Gunner....

                  dumb question, and I think I sorta know my answer ....

                  Snap a photo of one of my cats with the built in flash..
                  Looks awesome in the image replay on the F828 screen
                  Life seems good
                  Open up same image in Photoshop
                  whoa
                  way way dark
                  play with levels a bit and i'm a-ok again

                  What gives???
                  My PC monitor can't be that wacked out. Sites and content look fine.
                  Photoshop seems to be a-ok

                  I know I shouldn't rely on the F828's screen as the end all sign of success, but I'd think the two would match up a bit closer when I look at an image either way, or whats the point of viewing what's just been shot with the F828 ?

                  Me and something I'm doing??
                  or thats just the way it is.....

                  thanks again.
                  happens to me all the time.
                  the histogram is ok, but ultimately what I do is, snap 1/2 dozen test pics, run over to the laptop and view them... it's probably the amateur way to make sure the lighting is good, but it works every time.

                  if you don't have the availability, or if you're out in the field, just remember the LCD is always brighter than what the real output will be.
                  gunner @tutamail.com
                  25 years in the jizz biz

                  Comment

                  • FilthyRob
                    Confirmed User
                    • Feb 2004
                    • 6741

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Lester
                    quick photoshop combo

                    Top is what opens up in photoshop with no modifications

                    Bottom is a representation of what I see in the F828 LCD screen if I look at what I just shot

                    Looks like my cat only with long hair
                    AKA - Clubsexy

                    Comment

                    • Silicon
                      Registered User
                      • Dec 2004
                      • 91

                      #11
                      yes my lcd is always a little brighter than the picture it takes, but not by that much.

                      i think the viewfinder is a little more accurate.

                      i really wish they had one of those superhuge lcd's on the back of the cam. that would be really nice.

                      Comment

                      • Lester
                        Confirmed User
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 468

                        #12
                        yeah its sorta weird, almost like most everything is a full stop underexposed.

                        Got a friend bringing his Minolta meters over so we can compare his handheld meter to mine and do some still subject tests etc.

                        I try to see what an image looks like before proceeding, but it would be nice to know its all relatively close beforehand.



                        I just remember in all the shoots that produced the boxes and boxes and boxes of slides in the late 90s I never had an issue or a real worry like these days.

                        Set up strobes, meter, shoot until I ran out of film.
                        never second guessed things.

                        will play some more with it though ....

                        thanks
                        meow
                        I have no sig...sigh

                        Comment

                        • Adam-EB
                          Confirmed User
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 393

                          #13
                          We use the F-828.
                          We use the HVL-1000 flash for indoor stuff, and the HVL-F32X for outdoor shooting.
                          SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                          Comment

                          • Dirty D
                            Confirmed User
                            • May 2002
                            • 4044

                            #14
                            I just bought one for the Burst Mode...

                            Need to be able to catch the flying cum shots


                            An awesome camera so far!

                            Dirty D - ICQ #1326843 - $1 Million Dollars of Bonus Money - 8,000+ FHG!
                            Glory Hole Girlz - Crack Whore Confessions - Tampa Bukkake - Slut Wife Training - Fuck a Fan
                            Electricity Play - Porn Video Drive - Theater Sluts - Skunk Riley - Ukraine Amateurs - Strapon Sessions

                            Comment

                            • Justfuckedmyself
                              Confirmed User
                              • Aug 2003
                              • 452

                              #15
                              I got an F828. Absolutely love it. Heres a pic I took recently with it in Vegas.

                              ICQ: 378185299

                              Comment

                              Working...