2257 Conviction.. cock sucker.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $pikes
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2002
    • 1055

    #1

    2257 Conviction.. cock sucker.

    Here's one...

    At least the conviction was based on actual CP and not just record keeping.

    XBIZ

    SYRACUSE, N.Y. ? After failing to provide the proper age-verification documentation on several underage models, a well-known author who once mingled with Ernest Hemingway was sentenced to three years in federal prison and fined $25,000.

    Ralph G. Martell, 78, of Eaton, N.Y., was found guilty of felony charges by a U.S. District Court judge for producing sexually explicit photographs of models and violating federal 2257 law that requires photographers to acquire and maintain proof of age.

    Federal law requires persons who produce such material to ascertain, by examination of identification documents, the true names and dates of birth of every person portrayed in the visual depictions, and to create and maintain individually identifiable records of each performer.

    Martell's photographs, featuring five girls between the ages of 13-17, were first reported by a film processing company, which filed a report with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in January 2004.

    Martell reportedly confessed to taking the explicit photographs and to not having the proper documentation to prove the girls' ages; however, he claims they lied about their ages.

    The author recruited the models through local newspaper advertisements and had been conducting nude photography sessions since 2002, according to court documents. Following an inspection of the Martell's home, authorities found additional photographs of young women in sexually explicit poses.

    Several of the girls involved gave affidavits to federal agents saying Martell was sometimes naked when he photographed them, and that he repeatedly offered them money for sex, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Lisa Fletcher. There were also allegations that Martell used alcohol and drugs to coerce his photography subjects.

    Martell, who is known as a world traveler and the owner of a popular New York restaurant, also will be required to undergo three years of supervision after his sentence is complete.

    His books include "When Does the Fun Start?" and "Never Stop Dancing."
    Last edited by $pikes; 06-03-2005, 07:59 PM.

    SMASHBUCKS Paying webmasters on time since 2001
    Joe Spikes - ICQ: 160069266
  • TheDoc
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2001
    • 13827

    #2
    News gets posted fast here.. I posted 3 minutes after you did.
    ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
    It's all disambiguation

    Comment

    • $pikes
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2002
      • 1055

      #3
      Originally posted by TheDoc
      News gets posted fast here.. I posted 3 minutes after you did.

      HAHA you Rock Doc!

      SMASHBUCKS Paying webmasters on time since 2001
      Joe Spikes - ICQ: 160069266

      Comment

      • Walrus
        Confirmed User
        • May 2005
        • 2150

        #4
        Damn, just read the other one and came here. That sure was quick.

        Comment

        • sixxxthsense
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2004
          • 2421

          #5
          Originally posted by Walrus
          Damn, just read the other one and came here. That sure was quick.
          sammeee fuck it i CLOSE FIREFOX FOR NOW!!!!

          Comment

          • Shoplifter
            Richest man in Babylon
            • Jan 2002
            • 5848

            #6
            Originally posted by $pikes
            Here's one...

            At least the conviction was based on actual CP and not just record keeping.

            XBIZ
            Why didn't they charge him with CP then? What he did was wrong, but possibly it's being whitewashed as CP.

            This is a very powerful precedent...I would love to see transcripts of the trial. I bet it was a pretty cut and dried matter to find him guilty on 2257.
            I Like Blondes

            Comment

            • tony299
              lurker
              • Aug 2002
              • 57021

              #7
              Originally posted by Shoplifter
              Why didn't they charge him with CP then? What he did was wrong, but possibly it's being whitewashed as CP.

              This is a very powerful precedent...I would love to see transcripts of the trial. I bet it was a pretty cut and dried matter to find him guilty on 2257.
              He didnt publish so how could he be guilty for 2257

              Comment

              • DWB
                Registered User
                • Jul 2003
                • 31779

                #8
                Originally posted by Shoplifter
                Why didn't they charge him with CP then? What he did was wrong, but possibly it's being whitewashed as CP.

                This is a very powerful precedent...I would love to see transcripts of the trial. I bet it was a pretty cut and dried matter to find him guilty on 2257.
                I agree with you.

                Comment

                • latinasojourn
                  Confirmed User
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 3191

                  #9
                  the DOJ said the purpose of 2257 is to prevent using children as models in sexually explicit poses.

                  and they nailed a guy. nothing about this is unreasonable.

                  good!

                  Comment

                  • NTSS
                    Confirmed User
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 5688

                    #10
                    Got what he deserved.....
                    ICQ: 150-803-430
                    Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

                    Comment

                    • tony299
                      lurker
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 57021

                      #11
                      Originally posted by latinasojourn
                      the DOJ said the purpose of 2257 is to prevent using children as models in sexually explicit poses.

                      and they nailed a guy. nothing about this is unreasonable.

                      good!
                      2257 is for published material this is very very dangerious

                      Comment

                      • p1mpdogg
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 16714

                        #12
                        thought he had 30 days to get compliant????
                        A fast fortune is easy to earn! Just go with a winner!

                        Comment

                        • tony299
                          lurker
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 57021

                          #13
                          Originally posted by p1mpdogg
                          thought he had 30 days to get compliant????
                          One more time he wasnt publishing they were for his own use, 2257 isnt for him. This is dangerious

                          Comment

                          • latinasojourn
                            Confirmed User
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 3191

                            #14
                            Originally posted by tony404
                            2257 is for published material this is very very dangerious

                            i think the article indicates they found sexually explicit stuff on his computer, and if he ever posted any images on the internet they can make him a publisher.


                            correction: i scanned the above article too fast---no mention of a computer or internet.

                            hmmmmm.
                            Last edited by latinasojourn; 06-03-2005, 09:43 PM.

                            Comment

                            • MikeHawk
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 6683

                              #15
                              Way to go Mr Spikes!..........
                              THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW

                              Comment

                              • tony299
                                lurker
                                • Aug 2002
                                • 57021

                                #16
                                Originally posted by latinasojourn
                                i think the article indicates they found sexually explicit stuff on his computer, and if he ever posted any images on the internet they can make him a publisher.
                                no they didnt it talks about they found more pictures around his house.The old man probably doesnt even have a computer .He was using film. Im telling you this is really bad, it opens up a huge box .

                                Comment

                                • xxxice
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Feb 2002
                                  • 5042

                                  #17
                                  Oh my

                                  Comment

                                  Working...