.XXX On The Way - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

sonofsam · 06-01-2005, 08:52 PM

whats 2257?

Spunky · 06-01-2005, 08:53 PM

I hope spunky.xxx will be available

JD · 06-01-2005, 08:54 PM

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/475442-xxx-happen.html

Connor · 06-01-2005, 08:57 PM

"and of those proceeds, a percentage will be donated to Adult Sites Advocating Child Protection and the battle against child pornography"

I guess that answers the question as to whether or not ASACP was offered money in exchange for their support. It would be a shame if this .XXX thing ends up causing SERIOUS hardship on the industry and it was brought about so that someone could cash in on a percentage of each domain name sale. I'd like to know if the ASACP Advisory Counsel agreed to supporting this and if they did what their reasons were other than money, or if this was something that was mandated from above. Did Joan make this decision? Did Helmy? Seems that ASACP's mission is being used to justify this .XXX bullshit, and I find that VERY unfortunate. Has Helmy gone on record about this yet?

Anthony · 06-01-2005, 09:08 PM

I was at one of their meetings where they were looking for support back in 2003, as were some I see posting in this thread.

I voted no, the majority of the people asked to raise their hands regarding adopting an xxx tld voted no.

This is bullshit, right from the start. It is relegating all of us into a managed and controled area.

Do not let this come to being.

Mr.Fiction · 06-01-2005, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor

"and of those proceeds, a percentage will be donated to Adult Sites Advocating Child Protection and the battle against child pornography"

What is wrong with ASACP supporting this bullshit? They are getting paid to support it?

If they are getting paid to support it, isn't that a conflict of interest with their supposed goals of protecting kids?

One of their main goal should be to protect free speech if they are industry supported.

If they don't support free speech, how are they any better than those right wing groups attacking porn and claiming it's for "the children"?

fuzzylogic · 06-02-2005, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor

Sorry to hear that... your help would have been valuable.

why do you say so? (i was not part of it, this is why i do not know)

fuzzylogic · 06-02-2005, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernelpanic

I think a better alternative would be a .kids TLD, whose sites are subject to a strict domain registration TOS. This way, there will be a "safe zone" for those who wish to be exposed to a narrow slice of the internet. Trying to restrict pornography, or any other objectionable form of content, is against the principles of free information flow on which the internet was founded.

thats fucking great! that is an awesome idea

polish_aristocrat · 06-02-2005, 03:18 AM

bump

Redrob · 06-02-2005, 03:30 AM

FSC has not supported the .xxx domains. They are bad for free speech. Money and a seat on the Board couldn't buy FSC support.

Now, whose your daddy?

B2BwithJoeD · 06-02-2005, 04:03 AM

REDUX

http://www7.nationalacademies.org/it...tepaper_7.html

Read your history.

B2BwithJoeD · 06-02-2005, 04:26 AM

hmm - that was weird.

tradermcduck · 06-02-2005, 05:51 AM

These guys will make their $1.5 million investment back in one day

Socks · 06-02-2005, 01:36 PM

Where do we complain?

Best thing I've read about this is that if we don't support a .XXX idea, then we shouldn't buy the domain names.

This action unfortunately brings potential risks. If for some reason there was a .com porn cleanup, you'd regret not having bought your .xxx domain. So essentially we're being forced to buy extra domain names to cover our ass, even though we don't want to, as a backup, in case this goes where we all can easily see it going. Without this company pushing for a .XXX TLD we would not be forced to do so. Isn't this illegal? There's gotta be a name for that.

That's like getting a new phone area code, and Bell telling us that we'll possibly lose our old phone numbers in the future if we don't buy a SECOND phone line now with the new area code. But even worse of course. WTF?!

GatorB · 06-02-2005, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tradermcduck

These guys will make their $1.5 million investment back in one day

How I thought no one was supporting this?

xxxjay · 06-02-2005, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor

"and of those proceeds, a percentage will be donated to Adult Sites Advocating Child Protection and the battle against child pornography"

I guess that answers the question as to whether or not ASACP was offered money in exchange for their support. It would be a shame if this .XXX thing ends up causing SERIOUS hardship on the industry and it was brought about so that someone could cash in on a percentage of each domain name sale. I'd like to know if the ASACP Advisory Counsel agreed to supporting this and if they did what their reasons were other than money, or if this was something that was mandated from above. Did Joan make this decision? Did Helmy? Seems that ASACP's mission is being used to justify this .XXX bullshit, and I find that VERY unfortunate. Has Helmy gone on record about this yet?

I don?t suppose any of this will really matter unless the use of these becomes mandatory. I would really like to see a list of who stands to gain from this. Without naming any names, it disgusts me to see people attempting to profit from the current unstable atmosphere that surrounds the industry in the name of ?child pornography?.

That is bullshit. Everybody knows that CP to the mainstream adult biz is a scourge. Honestly, I don?t even know how CP guys make money because nobody I know would even process a transaction for that shit.

CP just gives people convenient high moral ground to stand on and there have been a number of organizations (including the government) that are using it to fuck with a lot of people right now. It?s a bullshit tactic, its wrong, and it obscures the real problem.

It would be very easy to make a meta tag that would block adult content. That would be free and I?m sure everyone would do it, plus if you made it mandatory it would be easy to enforce.

Why hasn?t anyone suggested anything like this?

taibo · 06-02-2005, 01:48 PM

damn thats bad news

06-01-2005, 08:52 PM	#51
sonofsam Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Vancouver Posts: 18,638	whats 2257? __________________ I like turtles.

06-01-2005, 08:53 PM	#52
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,944	I hope spunky.xxx will be available __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

06-01-2005, 08:57 PM	#54
Connor Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 1,294	"and of those proceeds, a percentage will be donated to Adult Sites Advocating Child Protection and the battle against child pornography" I guess that answers the question as to whether or not ASACP was offered money in exchange for their support. It would be a shame if this .XXX thing ends up causing SERIOUS hardship on the industry and it was brought about so that someone could cash in on a percentage of each domain name sale. I'd like to know if the ASACP Advisory Counsel agreed to supporting this and if they did what their reasons were other than money, or if this was something that was mandated from above. Did Joan make this decision? Did Helmy? Seems that ASACP's mission is being used to justify this .XXX bullshit, and I find that VERY unfortunate. Has Helmy gone on record about this yet? __________________ YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! \| SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?

06-02-2005, 03:18 AM	#59
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	bump __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

06-02-2005, 04:03 AM	#61
B2BwithJoeD Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: PayoutMag.com Posts: 1,390	REDUX http://www7.nationalacademies.org/it...tepaper_7.html Read your history. __________________ BLOG IT! How Will You Spend Your 2014 Profits? - PayoutMag.com Ask me About - Unique Processing and Marketing Solutions - Your Only Risk Is More Revenue!

06-01-2005, 08:54 PM	#53
JD Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 22,651	https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/475442-xxx-happen.html

06-01-2005, 09:08 PM	#55
Anthony Keyboard Warrior Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: One of the outer rings of Hell Posts: 9,653	I was at one of their meetings where they were looking for support back in 2003, as were some I see posting in this thread. I voted no, the majority of the people asked to raise their hands regarding adopting an xxx tld voted no. This is bullshit, right from the start. It is relegating all of us into a managed and controled area. Do not let this come to being.

06-02-2005, 03:30 AM	#60
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,791	FSC has not supported the .xxx domains. They are bad for free speech. Money and a seat on the Board couldn't buy FSC support. Now, whose your daddy?

06-02-2005, 04:26 AM	#62
B2BwithJoeD Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: PayoutMag.com Posts: 1,390	http://www7.nationalacademies.org/itas/whitepaper_7.html hmm - that was weird. __________________ BLOG IT! How Will You Spend Your 2014 Profits? - PayoutMag.com Ask me About - Unique Processing and Marketing Solutions - Your Only Risk Is More Revenue!

06-02-2005, 05:51 AM	#63
tradermcduck Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Europe - By the way I know my nickname sucks ;-) Posts: 2,362	These guys will make their $1.5 million investment back in one day __________________ MarkB

06-02-2005, 01:36 PM	#64
Socks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto Posts: 8,475	Where do we complain? Best thing I've read about this is that if we don't support a .XXX idea, then we shouldn't buy the domain names. This action unfortunately brings potential risks. If for some reason there was a .com porn cleanup, you'd regret not having bought your .xxx domain. So essentially we're being forced to buy extra domain names to cover our ass, even though we don't want to, as a backup, in case this goes where we all can easily see it going. Without this company pushing for a .XXX TLD we would not be forced to do so. Isn't this illegal? There's gotta be a name for that. That's like getting a new phone area code, and Bell telling us that we'll possibly lose our old phone numbers in the future if we don't buy a SECOND phone line now with the new area code. But even worse of course. WTF?!

06-02-2005, 01:48 PM	#67
taibo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 3,720	damn thats bad news