GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   My hun stats (not good) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=474964)

fris 05-31-2005 09:24 PM

no offense but your gallery sucked cock.


for the hun anyways

if you want something to convert dont post that shit :)

GatorB 05-31-2005 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete-KT
www.samsporn.com/gal148 that was the gallery, and it wasnt durring ccbills problem unless that happened today. Oh well im not worried baout it i still made my normal money from my other sites.

You are trying to sell a site called EJACULATING BABES. And in your gallery ther aren't any babes EJACULATING. That may be the problem.

directfiesta 05-31-2005 09:40 PM

Not the hun:

HITS 87
INITIALS 17
EPOCH RATIO 5.12
CREDITS 0
CHARGEBACKS 0
CREDITS 0
CHARGEBACKS 0
www.xxxxx.com

beemk 05-31-2005 09:46 PM

well the content sucks to begin with, and you're promoting an ejaculation sponsor with a content set where it doesnt even show the girl ejaculating. i dont know exactly what you expected, but stuff like that doesnt convert that good.

Nismo 05-31-2005 09:47 PM

That gallery SUCKED and the girl & pics sucked, also.

Alex 05-31-2005 09:50 PM

7-9% is pretty high.
I did 1% with my movie galleries on thehun

Snake Doctor 05-31-2005 09:51 PM

Oh man I wish there were threads started like this every day on GFY.

There's NO money in TGP traffic, especially The Hun :winkwink:

$5 submissions 05-31-2005 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doc911
If at first you don't succeed, try try again

Exactly.

The original poster can look at the other variables present ... adjust... and hopefully come up with a better result: content set, layout, sponsor, text....

Shoehorn! 05-31-2005 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunky
none - the hun gets revenue from pre-paid gallery placements on the top 15 spaces and banners. the rest of the galleries are free placements.

HAHAHA, there it is. :thumbsup

nekrom 05-31-2005 09:53 PM

Erm that gallery design was prity pox. You wasted 1 link using it on your header which would have been better used on some text adds before the first row of pics, but meh.

-N

chadglni 05-31-2005 09:56 PM

Wojbot v3.2 activated.

50

Wojbot v3.2 signing off.

beemk 05-31-2005 10:04 PM

where did you guys get the ctr? i only got 3.2% which is normal.

PhounTho 05-31-2005 10:10 PM

Shit, it's almost like thehun has some hidden agenda in posting bad galleries. Take a gander at this gem: http://www.biz4a.com/freesex/tgp/07/ from hun today for example.

One would think if b/c it's so hard to get listed that the galleries would all be quite superb, yet it's as if a 1000 monkeys at a 1000 computers do the selection process. Some are great galleries, some are shit. :2 cents:

Best advice so far was to submit only tweaked and tested galleries to thehun. That was common sense and sage all in one.

Theo 05-31-2005 10:14 PM

thehun lists a lot of galleries of people that are part time on this, nothing wrong if you ask me.

Alex 05-31-2005 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhounTho
Shit, it's almost like thehun has some hidden agenda in posting bad galleries. Take a gander at this gem: http://www.biz4a.com/freesex/tgp/07/ from hun today for example.

One would think if b/c it's so hard to get listed that the galleries would all be quite superb, yet it's as if a 1000 monkeys at a 1000 computers do the selection process. Some are great galleries, some are shit. :2 cents:

Best advice so far was to submit only tweaked and tested galleries to thehun. That was common sense and sage all in one.


You just dont get it.

Surfers want content, not design.

PhounTho 05-31-2005 10:29 PM

I don't really remeber mentioning content vs design. But now that you mention it, I'd say that of course you're right; surfers are after content that they think is hot, that's true inarguably, and I wouldn't ever say otherwise. :)

Good design, in my opinion, is something you add to great content. Design can reassure the surfer that the site is more legit and not a scam. I think somewhere in the surfer's head a really well designed gallery means that if they whip out the credit card they really will get access to something cool vice having their credit card number taped up in a subway in Malaysia.

Babagirls 05-31-2005 10:32 PM

well, its been said in this thread already, but that gallery sucks.
when i first saw it, i just saw a girl with a really bad looking pussy (hey, im just being honest!) and you content showed nothing about female ejaculation. you have to tease the surfer with what you're selling. by the look of your gallery, it would appear that you were promoting blondes or milfs or big pussys....but certainly not female ejacualtion.

anyways, i clicked through your sponsor (to see maybe there were errors in that) and it took about 10 seconds to load and im on broadband, imagine that on dial-up.

and (this has also been mentioned) but you should have tested out (1) that content and (2) that gallery design on other smaller tgps (3) the niche and (4) that sponsor. either you're a newbie or you are just new at the TGP game, either way, pick up the pointers that were given to you in this thread and try again.

GatorB 05-31-2005 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex
You just dont get it.

Surfers want content, not design.

Yep. Never meet anyone that said "Well the content sucks, but MAN look at that's site's design I'm giving them my $30."

GatorB 05-31-2005 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhounTho
Good design, in my opinion, is something you add to great content. Design can reassure the surfer that the site is more legit and not a scam. I think somewhere in the surfer's head a really well designed gallery means that if they whip out the credit card they really will get access to something cool vice having their credit card number taped up in a subway in Malaysia.

You give surfers too much credit. They don't think, period. In fact I do not want a surfer that thinks too much. If surfers went for pretty design would the hun be the #1 porn site out there?

Theo 05-31-2005 10:42 PM

anyone remember the best-of-web tgp? it was listing the very best looking gals.















finally it closed lol

Paul Markham 05-31-2005 11:06 PM

I doubt if that gallery and site will convert anywhere, not just the Hun.

I hit the back button as soon as I saw the second page on the tour.

nastyking 05-31-2005 11:18 PM

maybe, just maybe, it has something todo with the fact that free porn sucks ...

alan-l 05-31-2005 11:41 PM

now see it this way: you had 3500+ hits to your sponsor, and only 1 signup. That means 3500 people tried your sponsor and for one reason, they didn't signup. Were they scrubbed too hard? Maybe the sponsor failed? I told you about the overexposed content before, if surfers see those squirting sets ad nauseam, it's not a surprise they don't signup. Maybe you'd try another sponsor, better if not overexposed :thumbsup

pxxx 05-31-2005 11:45 PM

That kind of stat has got to hurt. I got 4 sales from my last listing, hope this one coming up is better. Win some lose some.

basschick 05-31-2005 11:47 PM

that gallery must not have set the surfers up to anticipate what your sponsor offers. i am no wizard, but with one exception, i can always expect at least 5 sales from thehun on day one of a gallery...

flashfreak 05-31-2005 11:53 PM

interresting... I had 2 galleries listed on thehun yesterday, from one - 2 signups and the other one nothing.
http://www.handslut.com/galleries/po...job/index.html
http://www.totalfilth.com/galleries/...irl/index.html

I see people saying: "oooh, it looks bad, you can't have better results with it" .

problem is only these galleries get listed on thehun... it's a vicious circle

pussyluver 06-01-2005 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfreak
interresting... I had 2 galleries listed on thehun yesterday, from one - 2 signups and the other one nothing.
http://www.handslut.com/galleries/po...job/index.html
http://www.totalfilth.com/galleries/...irl/index.html

I see people saying: "oooh, it looks bad, you can't have better results with it" .

problem is only these galleries get listed on thehun... it's a vicious circle

Damn! The art from I'm Live has been around awhile. Worn-out??? Wonder if that made a difference?

These results kinda make ya wanna buy choker traffic (I haven't done a spam post in awhile, just had to...)

the real magoo 06-01-2005 12:56 AM

wtf? is worldsex.com linking to thehun now? :)

juve20 06-01-2005 01:14 AM

yeah, the gallery wasn't very good.

better luck next time.

tony

baddog 06-01-2005 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete-KT
05/31/2005 3867 3520 1 1:3520 $1.17

That was what i got from my hun listings, my gallery got 109,000 page views and i got $1.17 WOW what fucking great conversions.


This the first time you ever submitted there or something?

flashfreak 06-01-2005 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pussyluver
Damn! The art from I'm Live has been around awhile. Worn-out??? Wonder if that made a difference?

you are sooo damn right! and now when I look at the content: the girl's left nipple is bigger than the right one!!! Wonder if that made a difference...

:1orglaugh

Manowar 06-01-2005 01:22 AM

owned!!!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123