surfer e-mails, 2257, and a hottie (pic)

**Mr.Right - Banned For Life** · 05-31-2005, 04:17 AM

She has a really sexy face, and body

Batts

**PlugRush Sascha** · 05-31-2005, 04:18 AM

Yeah, shit like that is fucked up about 2257...

**fusionx** · 05-31-2005, 04:19 AM

Originally posted by ktj4l

Yeah, shit like that is fucked up about 2257...

What if this was some rich guy who offerred a finder's fee?

He'd be at her door in a few days.

**naugthygUrL** · 05-31-2005, 04:19 AM

lovely face..

**PlugRush Sascha** · 05-31-2005, 04:20 AM

Originally posted by fusionx

What if this was some rich guy who offerred a finder's fee?

He'd be at her door in a few days.

No shit. That's what I was getting at by saying these new 2257 laws are fucked up.

**Corleone** · 05-31-2005, 04:21 AM

the new 2257 sucks...

good days for stalkers ...

**fusionx** · 05-31-2005, 04:21 AM

Originally posted by ktj4l

No shit. That's what I was getting at by saying these new 2257 laws are fucked up.

We agree

Many webmasters would quickly drop the dime for a handful of benjamins..

**xclusive** · 05-31-2005, 04:25 AM

Very sad I can only see bad thing coming out of this not only won't it do anything to really protect kids from being exploited. It will put innocent adult workers in harms way

**Rorschach** · 05-31-2005, 04:27 AM

damn das a hot bitch

**WebTitan** · 05-31-2005, 04:31 AM

very hot babe

**Grapesoda** · 05-31-2005, 05:11 AM

Originally posted by fusionx

Dear Sir

I do not wish to offend but could you please tell me
whether Juman on your website is available for private
escort and how I might contact her?

Kind regards

Juman is a model who has been shot by several of the leading erotic photographers, most notably, Voronin. She has numerous sets on MET-Art.

How many "webmasters" would have given this guy her contact info, which they will have under 2257?

Here's Juman - I can see why he asked:

well according the the gov we deserve no protection 'cause we are just porno folks. now any nut can buy a set for $10 and track some hottie down and 'tune her up' . . . wonder how the liability is gonna fall when the 'lust murders' start?

**David!** · 05-31-2005, 05:15 AM

I wonder if this will be brought up to the first injunction hearing.
In these days of crazy stalkers and identity theft, it surely is not a good idea to have personal information readily available to any retard out there

**bigdog** · 05-31-2005, 05:15 AM

no one seems to be worried about the girls suing them for giving out their personal info, and some guys got really phat bank accounts

**Grapesoda** · 05-31-2005, 05:19 AM

Originally posted by bigdog

no one seems to be worried about the girls suing them for giving out their personal info, and some guys got really phat bank accounts

no big deal the lawyers will just work permission for passing out the personal info into the releases

**Basic_man** · 05-31-2005, 05:54 AM

Damn, I'd hit her big time !

**BillyHoe** · 05-31-2005, 05:59 AM

unfortunately it's going to take an example for people to see giving that info out is dangerous. Hopefully no one gets seriously hurt by it.

**tony286** · 05-31-2005, 06:35 AM

you dont need 2257 for that pic

**Terry** · 05-31-2005, 06:38 AM

Wow she is hot. And ya I agree wouldnt take much for someone to give up the info.. money talks.

**Ogix** · 05-31-2005, 06:41 AM

wow...she is hot

**tony286** · 05-31-2005, 06:46 AM

I looked up actual data on stalking like almost all stalkers knew the person. I dont think, this huge stalking surge would happen. Also I think the way to stop alot of this is no selling of content or giving ids to a affiliate unless they are incorporated.

**Tom_PM** · 05-31-2005, 06:49 AM

Dear Sir

I do not wish to offend but could you please tell me
whether Juman on your website is available for private
escort and how I might contact her?

Kind regards

Reply:

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your email and your interest in Juman. You can see more of here here <insert link code to paysite>.

Kind regards

ps: There is no other way that I'm aware of to see her.

**Furious_Male** · 05-31-2005, 06:49 AM

Originally posted by BillyHoe

unfortunately it's going to take an example for people to see giving that info out is dangerous. Hopefully no one gets seriously hurt by it.

It will take someone getting seriously hurt for it to change any of there minds.

**mardigras** · 05-31-2005, 07:37 AM

Originally posted by Furious_Male

It will take someone getting seriously hurt for it to change any of there minds.

Unless it was an epidemic they would probably spin it off that porn has always been a dangerous world and bring up Taylor Sumers, noting that it was prior to 2257.

**fusionx** · 05-31-2005, 02:43 PM

Originally posted by tony404

you dont need 2257 for that pic

true enough. but the point still stands

**pornguy** · 05-31-2005, 02:46 PM

Very hot girl. But I would not give him anything.

But dont worry, the government will make sure that a few of the girls get killed by their stupidity.

**axelcat** · 05-31-2005, 02:47 PM

shes cute

**tranza** · 05-31-2005, 02:56 PM

She's ugly...

**METStaff** · 05-31-2005, 03:18 PM

Hi Guys,
Regarding Juman, her identity is safe. MET-ART.com is one of the very few sites that does not display hard core / pornography. We are not required to publish her identity, and we will not under the new law :-)
I believe that Domai is another site that will be exempt, but most sites that claim to be Artistic / Softcore / Inspired by MET, etc. are not safe, as most of them display Hardcore photos / movies. If anyone needs one of the best F.A. Lawyers on the planet, send an email. There's so many tragic Lawyers around these days that claim to know what is really going on, that is not even funny. They're terrorizing their clients. Anyway, sorry for intruding. Juman is really gorgeous (And her name is not Juman...).

MET Staff

**justsexxx** · 05-31-2005, 03:22 PM

It's such a stupid rule. I mean it was meant to prevend girls/guys under 18 from sexual activities. In other words against CP, but you really think those CP assholes give a shit about the 2257. Oh well :S

**sniperwolf** · 05-31-2005, 03:27 PM

Originally posted by tranza

She's ugly...

okay... you can't be serious... she looks pretty hot!

**MandyBlake** · 05-31-2005, 03:29 PM

she's very sexy.

**AphEX** · 05-31-2005, 03:30 PM

she's hot

**XPays** · 05-31-2005, 03:30 PM

Originally posted by METStaff

Hi Guys,
...most sites that claim to be Artistic / Softcore / Inspired by MET, etc. are not safe, as most of them display Hardcore photos / movies. If anyone needs one of the best F.A. Lawyers on the planet, send an email. There's so many tragic Lawyers around these days that claim to know what is really going on, that is not even funny. They're terrorizing their clients. Anyway, sorry for intruding. Juman is really gorgeous (And her name is not Juman...).

MET Staff

now that has to be the most gracious and tactfully polite legal warning i have ever seen. nicely put

surfer e-mails, 2257, and a hottie (pic)

surfer e-mails, 2257, and a hottie (pic)

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment