NATS to remove support for MyVirtualCard

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TMM_John
    Confirmed User
    • May 2004
    • 6664

    #1

    NATS to remove support for MyVirtualCard

    Due to the recent findings of MyVirtualCard processing transactions for underage non-nude sites portraying children in a sexual manner Too Much Media LLC has decided to cease supporting MVC as a biller.

    The sites MVC is processing for consist of girls ranging from 8 years old to 16 years old posing in sheer lingere, underwear, swimsuits, short skirts, etc. These poses are clearly in a sexual manner and these sites are targetted to nothing more than people who are sexually attracted to underage women. These sites are clearly morally wrong and most likely legally wrong.

    Too Much Media LLC will not support or condone sites of this nature and/or anyone supporting them in any way.

    At a time which MVC has discontinued processing for sites of this type Too Much Media may reconsider supporting their processing via NATS.

    All of our clients are being notified of this policy change and will be given ample time to remove MVC from their cascades and all rebills will continue to be paid out to affiliates.

    If any more information or assistance is needed please feel free to contact us at any time.


    Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!
  • azguy
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2004
    • 5167

    #2
    Good long-term move.

    Comment

    • Trax
      [----------------------]
      • Aug 2001
      • 14486

      #3
      I can see where this is coming from
      I wouldn't want to be associated with such sites as well!

      Comment

      • Pete-KT
        Workin With The Devil
        • Oct 2004
        • 51532

        #4
        Very nice move on Nats side, good work guys

        Comment

        • directfiesta
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Oct 2002
          • 30150

          #5
          LOL...

          MVC turned me down for processing of an e-book ( mainstream, and not the " how to get rich" scam ) ....
          Next time, I will spice it with underage kids ...
          I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

          But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

          Comment

          • Trixxxia
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2004
            • 5600

            #6
            Originally posted by Trax
            I can see where this is coming from
            I wouldn't want to be associated with such sites as well!
            Makes two of us - and I'm gathering most of the industry feels the same!

            Comment

            • Basic_man
              Programming King Pin
              • Oct 2003
              • 27360

              #7
              Good move. I think MVC will not stay online for too long..
              UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
              Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

              Comment

              • dready
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2002
                • 5247

                #8
                I hope MVC responds to this.
                ICQ: 91139591

                Comment

                • rabbit
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 2124

                  #9
                  damn, i didnt know they did that...

                  Got a paysite? Get it reviewed by RabbitsReviews and TheBestPorn

                  Comment

                  • Matt_WildCash
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 1699

                    #10
                    Good move guys I hope MVC responds to this also

                    Try the New XMovies.com and make more $$$ with your Traffic

                    Comment

                    • Dirty F
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jul 2001
                      • 59204

                      #11
                      Originally posted by directfiesta
                      Next time, I will spice it with underage kids ...

                      Comment

                      • Roald
                        SecretFriends.com
                        • May 2001
                        • 27910

                        #12
                        Smart move


                        WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME



                        ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT


                        Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr

                        Comment

                        • Project-Shadow
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 7340

                          #13
                          Nice move, but TBH, I can't see anyone who uses NATS running an underage site.

                          Comment

                          • AdultMovies.bz
                            Confirmed User
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 1036

                            #14
                            Damn, I use MVC as a secondary processor on one of my sites, hope they dont go out of business soon...
                            $8.35 High-Usage Adult Hosting: 510GB Storage + 5010GB Bandwidth + SQL + SSL + Free Domain With Whois Privacy.
                            Use this Coupon Code for extra 25GB Storage Space when you join: 25freegb

                            Comment

                            • New Hope
                              Registered User
                              • May 2005
                              • 15

                              #15
                              why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?

                              I can understand removing processing for future clients, but if you remove a processor from an existing client you might be in for a nasty suprise when their lawyers knock on your door... it's called Tortious Interference... you're not allowed to purposely interfere with the contracts of others and the only purpose your move has is to interfere with sites who use that processor.

                              Who died and made you king?

                              Comment

                              • Dirty F
                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                • Jul 2001
                                • 59204

                                #16
                                Originally posted by New Hope
                                why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?
                                So? Theres a difference between 8 and 18 you cumbucket.

                                Comment

                                • Dirty F
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Jul 2001
                                  • 59204

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by New Hope
                                  why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?

                                  I can understand removing processing for future clients, but if you remove a processor from an existing client you might be in for a nasty suprise when their lawyers knock on your door... it's called Tortious Interference... you're not allowed to purposely interfere with the contracts of others and the only purpose your move has is to interfere with sites who use that processor.

                                  Who died and made you king?
                                  And i think theyre free to remove any processor they want from their software.

                                  Now stfu shitstick.

                                  Comment

                                  • retardednewbie
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jul 2002
                                    • 191

                                    #18
                                    I hope MVC responds to this..

                                    I assume TMM contacted MVC about this before ceasing support, and maybe MVC didn't respond.

                                    Comment

                                    • TMM_John
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • May 2004
                                      • 6664

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by New Hope
                                      why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?

                                      I can understand removing processing for future clients, but if you remove a processor from an existing client you might be in for a nasty suprise when their lawyers knock on your door... it's called Tortious Interference... you're not allowed to purposely interfere with the contracts of others and the only purpose your move has is to interfere with sites who use that processor.

                                      Who died and made you king?
                                      I don't believe CCBill is processing for any underage sites. We did not remove them for non-nude, we removed them for under age.

                                      No one made us "King". We're simply choosing not to do business with nor associate with someone supporting underage sites.

                                      Also, I prefer to get my legal advice from our lawyers not from some anonymous poster with 4 posts who probably registered on GFY today. Thanks tho.


                                      Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                      Comment

                                      • jimmyf
                                        OU812
                                        • Feb 2001
                                        • 12651

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Franck
                                        And i think theyre free to remove any processor they want from their software.

                                        Now stfu shitstick.
                                        I'll 2nd that

                                        Nice move Nats
                                        Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
                                        Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
                                        Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting

                                        Comment

                                        • TMM_John
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • May 2004
                                          • 6664

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by retardednewbie
                                          I hope MVC responds to this..

                                          I assume TMM contacted MVC about this before ceasing support, and maybe MVC didn't respond.
                                          Of course we've spoken with MVC, both before and after this post.


                                          Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                          Comment

                                          • Trixxxia
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Aug 2004
                                            • 5600

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by New Hope
                                            why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?

                                            Who died and made you king?
                                            I'll agree with Franck - non-nude 18 yr olds are quite different from non-nude 8 year olds. One caters to one group of folks, the other caters to another sick bunch of fucks.

                                            NATS has the right to add/remove access to use the processors as they see fit. They aren't telling you that you have to cancel your contract, they are telling you that you will not be able to cascade it through their script any longer.

                                            Comment

                                            • cambaby
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Feb 2003
                                              • 3141

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by PBucksJohn
                                              These sites are clearly morally wrong

                                              Comment

                                              • fris
                                                I have to go potty
                                                • Aug 2002
                                                • 55722

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by PBucksJohn
                                                I don't believe CCBill is processing for any underage sites. We did not remove them for non-nude, we removed them for under age.

                                                No one made us "King". We're simply choosing not to do business with nor associate with someone supporting underage sites.

                                                Also, I prefer to get my legal advice from our lawyers not from some anonymous poster with 4 posts who probably registered on GFY today. Thanks tho.
                                                john just curious, do you have access to every members credit card information through the "master" control panel that signs up under every nats system. meaning you can control everything.
                                                Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

                                                My Latest Theme

                                                Comment

                                                • WiredGuy
                                                  Pounding Googlebot
                                                  • Aug 2002
                                                  • 34512

                                                  #25
                                                  What happens to clients who have already integrated with MVC? They won't be able to track any new joins from NATS?
                                                  WG
                                                  I play with Google.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • TMM_John
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • May 2004
                                                    • 6664

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by fris
                                                    john just curious, do you have access to every members credit card information through the "master" control panel that signs up under every nats system. meaning you can control everything.
                                                    Yes, it's all true, there's a big red switch in the office. If we flip it, everyone gets charged $99.95 and we jump in the escape capsule and we're whisked off to our private island in the Bahamas.

                                                    Seriously, no. Processors such as CCBill, Paycom, etc. who are IPSPs do not allow any third party to take the credit card information so there is no way they can even have access to it let alone us. Any NATS client is permitted to totally lock us out of their system, but the vast majority permit us access. It's up to the client. People of course will now claim that there may be backdoors, secret logins, etc. but any technical person with decent abilities would still be able to detect this happening.

                                                    Both myself and Charlie are and were very well established before NATS came along. We have no reason to desire access to control or see everyone's data. We have no need for it. Jealous competition and jealous unsuccessful people love to start rumors tho. Comes with the territory. There is no "master control panel" no "master login" and no "consipracy" no matter how desperate the sig whores are for one.


                                                    Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                                    Comment

                                                    • TMM_John
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • May 2004
                                                      • 6664

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by WiredGuy
                                                      What happens to clients who have already integrated with MVC? They won't be able to track any new joins from NATS?
                                                      WG
                                                      We've spoken with them and all of that is resolved. They have all agreed with the decision.


                                                      Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                                      Comment

                                                      • WiredGuy
                                                        Pounding Googlebot
                                                        • Aug 2002
                                                        • 34512

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by PBucksJohn
                                                        We've spoken with them and all of that is resolved. They have all agreed with the decision.
                                                        You've spoken to every NATS client about this and they all unanimously agreed?
                                                        WG
                                                        I play with Google.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • tradermcduck
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Apr 2001
                                                          • 2362

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by carbondream
                                                          damn, i didnt know they did that...
                                                          Same here - good to know...
                                                          MarkB

                                                          Comment

                                                          • TMM_John
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • May 2004
                                                            • 6664

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by WiredGuy
                                                            You've spoken to every NATS client about this and they all unanimously agreed?
                                                            WG
                                                            No, with those who were using MVC.


                                                            Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                                            Comment

                                                            • William-Xfactor
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Mar 2004
                                                              • 299

                                                              #31
                                                              Bump

                                                              No longer using their service after reading this.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Nysus
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Aug 2001
                                                                • 7817

                                                                #32
                                                                Curious if the sites were non-nude and non-sexual, if you'd have a problem with them? By law, if there's no sexual poses / unnatural (and non-sexual) poses then it's legal.

                                                                Matt
                                                                What name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now

                                                                Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for *pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets*

                                                                See http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?p=16744521 and for more detailed see http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=948645

                                                                Comment

                                                                • TMM_John
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • May 2004
                                                                  • 6664

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by Nysus
                                                                  Curious if the sites were non-nude and non-sexual, if you'd have a problem with them? By law, if there's no sexual poses / unnatural (and non-sexual) poses then it's legal.

                                                                  Matt
                                                                  I'm not posting links to the sites but in my opinion they are clearly sexual.

                                                                  Anyone who is going to tell me someone buying a membership for $25-45 per month for access to photos of girls in underwear is doing it for a non-sexual purpose is lying to and trying to convince themselves, not me.

                                                                  If they were not sexual and we could see a clear purpose to the site then no, we would not have an issue with it. These sites however, in our opinion, are clearly sexual in nature.


                                                                  Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • corvette
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                                    • 7880

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by New Hope
                                                                    why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?

                                                                    Because our name was brought up, i will commment:

                                                                    http://businesscenter.ccbill.com/htm...table_use.html

                                                                    3. Violation of CCBill Policy

                                                                    D. The posting, display, or advertising of any image using a model or models under the age of 18 years anywhere on the site whether the models are clothed or unclothed.
                                                                    Last edited by corvette; 05-27-2005, 08:28 AM.
                                                                    If you need a good company for check writing services, then check out checkissuing, and for webhosting, check out Phoenix NAP

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • TMM_John
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • May 2004
                                                                      • 6664

                                                                      #35
                                                                      [QUOTE=corvette]
                                                                      Originally posted by New Hope
                                                                      why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?
                                                                      QUOTE]

                                                                      Because our name was brought up, i will commment:

                                                                      http://businesscenter.ccbill.com/htm...table_use.html

                                                                      3. Violation of CCBill Policy

                                                                      D. The posting, display, or advertising of any image using a model or models under the age of 18 years anywhere on the site whether the models are clothed or unclothed.
                                                                      Thank you. A policy every processor should have.


                                                                      Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • New Hope
                                                                        Registered User
                                                                        • May 2005
                                                                        • 15

                                                                        #36
                                                                        nats is not an asp, it is software that you purchase. If you bought microsoft word because it had features x, y, and z and Bill Gates decided one day that you didnt need a spell checker anymore and he just conveniently removed your ability to use that feature you'd be pretty fucking pissed I imagine.

                                                                        I'm not questioning whether the content was good or not, i'm questioning nat's decision to retroactively remove a processor from a paysite.

                                                                        How do you know which of your clients were using MVC? What about clients who own the software outright and lock you out?

                                                                        I think when you start down the road of being the moral police for other people you're going to endanger your business.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • TMM_John
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • May 2004
                                                                          • 6664

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by New Hope
                                                                          nats is not an asp, it is software that you purchase. If you bought microsoft word because it had features x, y, and z and Bill Gates decided one day that you didnt need a spell checker anymore and he just conveniently removed your ability to use that feature you'd be pretty fucking pissed I imagine.

                                                                          I'm not questioning whether the content was good or not, i'm questioning nat's decision to retroactively remove a processor from a paysite.

                                                                          How do you know which of your clients were using MVC? What about clients who own the software outright and lock you out?

                                                                          I think when you start down the road of being the moral police for other people you're going to endanger your business.
                                                                          Then our opinions differ. Simple as that.


                                                                          Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Snake Doctor
                                                                            I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                            • Mar 2001
                                                                            • 13449

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Nice move
                                                                            sig too big

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • dready
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Oct 2002
                                                                              • 5247

                                                                              #39
                                                                              I just spoke with MVC who said they will be implementing a new policy to prevent this.

                                                                              However, I'm quite shocked that they haven't made a reply here yet.
                                                                              ICQ: 91139591

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • BillyHoe
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Mar 2003
                                                                                • 2214

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Hopefully MVC will clean their acts up, they actually have a great system, providing they are truly obidding by all the Visa regs.

                                                                                True Amateur Sites!!



                                                                                ICQ:124399549

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • opflix
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Jul 2002
                                                                                  • 1428

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  good move... fuck the bastards who allow that shit 2 b sold & those who help them sell it :






                                                                                  ...
                                                                                  Social Escrow - Buying & Selling Accounts? Contact Me | Social Escrow IG

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • CybermedAndy
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Jul 2004
                                                                                    • 4170

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Good move John, kudos to you and the team

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • SinisterStudios
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Nov 2003
                                                                                      • 3087

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Great business decision guys
                                                                                      SEOIP.com
                                                                                      Multiple IP Webhosting
                                                                                      Shared and Dedicated IP's - Multiple Class A's - From $1.99/ip

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Damian_Maxcash
                                                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                                                        • Oct 2002
                                                                                        • 12745

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by New Hope
                                                                                        nats is not an asp, it is software that you purchase. If you bought microsoft word because it had features x, y, and z and Bill Gates decided one day that you didnt need a spell checker anymore and he just conveniently removed your ability to use that feature you'd be pretty fucking pissed I imagine.

                                                                                        I'm not questioning whether the content was good or not, i'm questioning nat's decision to retroactively remove a processor from a paysite.

                                                                                        How do you know which of your clients were using MVC? What about clients who own the software outright and lock you out?

                                                                                        I think when you start down the road of being the moral police for other people you're going to endanger your business.
                                                                                        Your argument is ill thought out and is to be honest, offensive.

                                                                                        Welcome to GFY, you will fit right in

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • jungar
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Jul 2003
                                                                                          • 377

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Please see our Announcement

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • DWB
                                                                                            Registered User
                                                                                            • Jul 2003
                                                                                            • 31779

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Good move. This industry needs to police itself from time to time. Sadly it's not illegal, but all that non-nude close to CP shit needs to go as well as any company that supports it.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • DWB
                                                                                              Registered User
                                                                                              • Jul 2003
                                                                                              • 31779

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by jungar
                                                                                              Please see our Announcement
                                                                                              Another good move.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Theo
                                                                                                HAL 9000
                                                                                                • May 2001
                                                                                                • 34515

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
                                                                                                Another good move.
                                                                                                that's a scary signature lol

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • fris
                                                                                                  I have to go potty
                                                                                                  • Aug 2002
                                                                                                  • 55722

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  i never liked the nn tgps, they only cater to one kind of people, you obviously can tell what kind
                                                                                                  Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

                                                                                                  My Latest Theme

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • SleazyDream
                                                                                                    I'm here for SPORT
                                                                                                    • Jul 2001
                                                                                                    • 41470

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    Originally posted by PBucksJohn

                                                                                                    Seriously, no. Processors such as CCBill, Paycom, etc. who are IPSPs do not allow any third party to take the credit card information so there is no way they can even have access to it let alone us. Any NATS client is permitted to totally lock us out of their system, but the vast majority permit us access. It's up to the client. People of course will now claim that there may be backdoors, secret logins, etc. but any technical person with decent abilities would still be able to detect this happening.

                                                                                                    Both myself and Charlie are and were very well established before NATS came along. We have no reason to desire access to control or see everyone's data. We have no need for it. Jealous competition and jealous unsuccessful people love to start rumors tho. Comes with the territory. There is no "master control panel" no "master login" and no "consipracy" no matter how desperate the sig whores are for one.

                                                                                                    "We have no reason to desire access to control or see everyone's data."

                                                                                                    ummm, better to be totally honest then - there WOULD be a reason for it - I agree that you don't need to do it though and I don't think you ever have.
                                                                                                    This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

                                                                                                    Now read without the word dog.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...