NATS to remove support for MyVirtualCard - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Dirty F · 05-27-2005, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris

i never liked the nn tgps, they only cater to one kind of people, you obviously can tell what kind

Yes people who prefer softcore over hardcore.

Idiot.

TMM_John · 05-27-2005, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream

"We have no reason to desire access to control or see everyone's data."

ummm, better to be totally honest then - there WOULD be a reason for it

- I agree that you don't need to do it though and I don't think you ever have.

"We have no reason to desire access". Obviously some people would. My statement was that we don't. I understand what you mean tho by the difference

Bigjohn · 05-27-2005, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New Hope

nats is not an asp, it is software that you purchase. If you bought microsoft word because it had features x, y, and z and Bill Gates decided one day that you didnt need a spell checker anymore and he just conveniently removed your ability to use that feature you'd be pretty fucking pissed I imagine.

I'm not questioning whether the content was good or not, i'm questioning nat's decision to retroactively remove a processor from a paysite.

How do you know which of your clients were using MVC? What about clients who own the software outright and lock you out?

I think when you start down the road of being the moral police for other people you're going to endanger your business.

The only person who "owns" software is the person who wrote it. Everyone else, whether they lease or purchase, is paying for a LICENSE to use it, nothing more.

As for Microsoft.... Bill Gates decides shit like this all the time.
-He had their Java virtual machine removed from IE installations.
-Added popup blockers and defaulted them to on.
-Is in the process of forcing SP2 downloads on everyone.
-Is removing DOS support from Longhorn

Bottom line.... the developers of NATS can do whatever they want, it's their code.

DWB · 05-27-2005, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soul_Rebel

that's a scary signature lol

It' scares the trolls away.

Terry · 05-27-2005, 03:35 PM

Way to go!

fireorange · 05-27-2005, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris

i never liked the nn tgps, they only cater to one kind of people, you obviously can tell what kind

LOL, yes, it's called the Non-Nude niche

geeksta · 05-27-2005, 03:44 PM

you know, i read somewhere that these "child modeling sites" basically legal child porn without the "porn" were actually put together by, or encouraged by the parents of these young girls.

basschick · 05-27-2005, 03:45 PM

just as we've suspected :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

Yes, it's all true, there's a big red switch in the office. If we flip it, everyone gets charged $99.95 and we jump in the escape capsule and we're whisked off to our private island in the Bahamas.

geeksta · 05-27-2005, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

Yes people who prefer softcore over hardcore.

Idiot.

all of my sites are non nude and text. and all of the pictures are older (21-40) women or no women at all, just text. i actually have found that i make more money with this stuff than with the nudie penetration sex stuff. not like i'm a big playa or anything, but i don't have to work a day job anymore to make ends meet, that combined with my contracts with mainstream biz.

FelixFlow · 05-27-2005, 04:02 PM

don't confuse "Non Nude" with child model sites, moron

05-27-2005, 04:02 PM	#60
FelixFlow Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,779	don't confuse "Non Nude" with child model sites, moron __________________ ICQ: 643 339 687

05-27-2005, 03:35 PM	#55
Terry Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,604	Way to go!

05-27-2005, 03:44 PM	#57
geeksta Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 157	you know, i read somewhere that these "child modeling sites" basically legal child porn without the "porn" were actually put together by, or encouraged by the parents of these young girls.