2257 section states new definitions of acceptable identification , citing section 1028 as the legal definition of acceptable identification for record keeping.

Choose to ignore it Aaron, doesnt matter to me. Might want to read it though.

fine he just hates me for whatever reason. I could say the sky is blue and he'd call me a moron and come up with some dipshit reason why it's not blue but purple with yellow polk-dots just to be disagreeable.

Been here since 3 days after this board was made, have 45 usernames now, and though people hate me, no one can deny that in 2002 I had more adult content then anyone else on the internet, almost 2 million images and 600 hours of movies.

Don't talk 2257 to me, you have no idea.





Aaron, man, just read the shit. I didnt write it. Its the law. You want to profess to being the 2257 god, then read it and know it by heart.

Fuck even on Walter's site he says 2 forms of id and he's your buddy, you think he's lying to ya?

Shh.. the people at evil angel, west coast, equisite and a few others also think I am a no one.

How ironic is it that David has questions about being sued over content?

http://www.turboface.com/vv/doc1big.gif

http://www.turboface.com/vv/doc2big.gif

heh I worked for Caballero and ClubLove get the fuck out of town man. You are lost. Nuff said. Simpsons are on.

It wasn't over any content, it was over a perl script and anyone that reads it can see it.

Want to post something new?

You can post defunct court orders I dont mind.

Good for you, so you also saw lensmans invite over at mayors board.
Time in this industry means jack shit though. I can easily find sites that have been up since 96 or earlier that are still not compliant with the old regs. Amount of content shot also means jack shit if you did not understand the regs to begin with.

Though one thing is very clear to me, you just admitted to having 45 usernames here which make it very understandable that you do not understand nor follow rules.

Hell I'll post Jenna Jameson's 2257 and picture id if it makes you hot for a few minutes.
Got her address and telephone number.










But just think, if you bought her content, you'd get it now according to the new 2257 laws.

Yes and about 6 of every shirt and gift that adult.com gives away.

Not ONE person on here only has 1 nic. Not one. I think Juicy admitting having close to 30.

What next Henry. :1orglaugh

had to steal the 50

51

:winkwink:

You sir are banned

You got me, I am Henry which also makes me a black male. Boy will my parents be surprised.

You're wrong. Period.

Now lets see......

Section 75.1 Definitions.

(b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the United States, a State government or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory, that bears the photograph and the name of the individual identified, and provides sufficient specific information that it can be accessed from the issuing authority, such as a passport, Permanent Resident Card (commonly known as a ``Green Card''), or other employment authorization document issued by the United States, a driver's license issued by a State or the District of Columbia, or another form of identification issued by a State or the District of Columbia; or, a foreign government-issued equivalent of any of the documents listed above when both the person who is the subject of the picture identification card and the producer maintaining the required records are located outside the United States.

card.."Card", Singular, NOT "cards" plural.

a document..."a" being a singular word and also the use of the word "Document" vs. "documents."

Moving on.....

Section 75.2 Maintenance of records.

(a)
(1) The legal name and date of birth of each performer, obtained by the producer's examination of a picture identification card. For any performer portrayed in such a depiction made after July 3, 1995, the records shall also include a legible copy of the identification document examined and, if that document does not contain a recent and recognizable picture of the performer, a legible copy of a picture identification card. For any performer portrayed in such a depiction after June 23, 2005, the records shall include


"document"...Once again.."Document, NOT "documents"

"that document"..."That" being a singular word instead of saying "those" and also once again the use of the word "Document" vs. "documents."

Thank you for playing.

Please drive through.

Taking a picture of a drivers license by itself is not acceptable Aaron.
You are the ONLY content producer that would think it was.

As a form of ID it is acceptable as long as the picture still looks like the model.

Which is why you take a picture of the model holding the id up beside her face...

You can PROOVE it is her, even if her looks change later, you can proove she WAS there and the ID is legit and not a fake.

David, everyone knows that you don't have two nickels to rub together.

You'd figure that for all your years of taking advantage of webmasters, you'd have something to show for it.

:ugone2far

Listen in my first post did I not say to have the model hold the ID next to their face? Though this does not proove it is or is not a fake id.
Though the regs do not require this step.

Uh...Where did I even mention taking a picture of the license? Also, where did I say that was all that was needed to be compliant?

Now, I really am done with you.

Bye bye.

Hey kids....I'd like to make a suggestion.

Don't give this guy any more attention.

Fuck em. Just walk away from this thread as I am doing right now.

It is already shown he is an idiot. Also apparenty I am Henry and I am black. Though good idea I think I shall be done here as well.

For the record:

This is mi only nic. :upsidedow

I'm no lawyer, nor am I a content producer but I do know that as it sits the current 2257 law seems to violate some right to privacy laws. For example: if I go to work for a company that company will take down my information, including a copy of my drivers license or ID for thier records, taxes etc. But they can't just give it to everyone that buys the product the company makes. Same with credit card companies, insurance companies, doctors, pretty much anyone you give copies of ID to these days is forced to give you a copy of thier privacy policy. So I can't see how a court would let anyone with $30 buy some pics and get a models private information. Forget stalking Identity theft is now the #1 crime in America. Having your ID info availible to anyone with the money to buy a pic set seems a little wrong.

But then again, as I said, I'm not a lawyer.

Sixty-two commenters commented that revealing personal information
of performers, for example, in the form of their addresses on drivers'
licenses used as identification documents in compliance with this
regulation, is an invasion of performers' privacy and could lead to
identity theft or violent crimes. Forty commenters commented that
including the names and addresses of businesses where the records at
issue are located would similarly lead to crimes against those
businesses. The Department declines to adopt these comments. While the
Department is certainly concerned about possible crimes against
performers and businesses that employ them, the necessity of
maintaining these records to ensure that children are not exploited
outweighs these concerns.

Want to find out.

What are you gonna do, post your bank statments?

Oh, wait a minute, you can't. You can't get a bank account in your name because of that 2 million dollar judgment that you have against you.

:winkwink:

Not true. I have enough issues trying to keep up with my one nic.

Warning, do not trust David Stodghill.
https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/472458-megabondage-caution.html

Patrick, I want to tell you this in all seriousness.

Earlier you posted that I was a murder suspect which I will neither deny nor confirm.

I know where you live.

I know how far it is from my house.

Do you want to keep playing cat and mouse.

I only have one nick. Fuck nobody knows who am I now so WTF do I need 2 nics for. I'm so lazy this is my nic on all webmaster boards.

Hmmm, is that a threat that should be brought to the attention of the mods?

Same here. god, I'm so predictable.
:1orglaugh

Gee, I'd hate to have to dig into another one of my 45 usernames.

David, in all seriousness, you're full of shit.

You should be careful about threatening people's lives online.

:winkwink:

'sokay, eventually they'll all get banned too. It's not that difficult to figure out which nic is you.

Exactly. Dave's not as slick as he think he is.

'MegaBondage' has just been banned.

:thumbsup

Violations of Privacy!
 

We have spoken to three Attorneys on this subject.
To the best of our ability we have found four Federal regulations that a producer MUST violate to comply with this new ruling.

Producers MUST violate the following:

1. Freedom of information act
2. Personal Privacy Laws
3. Anti Stalking Laws
4. Releasing of pertinent personal information with the intent to do harm

We are firm believers that PRIVACY must be kept safe - thus said how do you do it in this environment?

? Producer is going to really have to watch who they licensed content to.
? Producers are going to have to inform talent of the new rules and make sure the talent acknowledges that they understand them new rules.
? Producers MUST do everything within their power to protect talents personal data.

We have a client that has decided to enclose edited copies of Identification and a text file outlining the pertinent details to each production.

They are then using our software were buy the can offer clients / webmasters secure real time presentation of needed documents within moments of request. They will offer their clients the ability to log onto a secure site and recover the needed documents once they have proven their identity or needs to our client.

This ensures that the receiver of the information is NOTY just some stalker who bought a single $6.00 photo set to get a girls personal information.

Ask yourself if a stalker injures or worse yet kills a model based on a producer freely giving away the information whose will be sued?
The producer or the Federal Government?

These are scary times for the industry and avoiding these new rules will NOT save you.
Action MUST be taken by ALL producers and secondary producers to ensure they are compliant in the next 30 days.

Don't drag me into this :)