no, you are shady or naive.

what do you see on xxxcash's landing now btw? natalie portman?

also do some quick searching in the engines and tell me if you see any xxxcash affiliates infringing on our client's intellectual property.

All that being said you still have not answered the questions posed.

Don't waste time on this, no skin off my ass, but seeing ithat paris seems to be your one and only marketing ploy you might want to spend a bit more time answering your affiliates concerns rather then raising concerns of other programs.

BTW, some text message on Paris's t-mobile is HARDLY proof of anything. If that is your defense and proof of a business relationship between you and Hiton, then wow....... WOW.

Yes, I tend to cash checks made out to me also, regardless of the source. ;) Show me someone that doesnt.

Wow... with that kind of documentation you are covered for sure. :1orglaugh

Youre deflecting again. ;)

If we were naive, we would not be asking the question.


:helpme

ok, think whatever you want. you are grasping at straws. peas out!

Does not matter what I think. The people that is does matter to will find out one way or another. :winkwink:

Still, a very worthwhile question to pose and a question that you are clearly afraid or, have good reason not to answer. The burden of proof does not fall on my questions, but on your answers. I think your lack of an answer is answer enough.

Regards


:thumbsup

OH man...

LOL.

Evan says he has it, he has it.
He has rights to publicity also.

He has said so before, he has the contacts to make it all happen.
HUGE Difference.

There shouldnt be any doubts about his Paris Product.
He has answered this shit plenty of times.

when we first launched - of course people were skeptical. now it is a little late in the game to be so outright naive.

Asking a legitimate question(s) does not make one "naive". Like you guys would be the first to run with a site without a release and proper docs.

Please


Either way, do what you do.

i gave you legit answers.

i fucked her

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

thats funny, go tell an attorny that I am sure they will get a good laugh or better yet tell the judge :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

there are no exceptions because it seems obvious that she is of age. It's all about record keeping. You can get in trouble for not having 2257 on a 60 year old women, does not matter at all.

Judge's dont work on "hunches" or what "may" be obvious.

If they ask you for 2257 documentation for your paris hilton ad banner and you say " this guy on gfy said its ok " isn't going to cut it..

Im not doubting xpays legal rights to the video, but when other sponsors are contacting affiliates telling them they will be cancelled if they promote xpays , then "someone" must not believe they do..

Xpays doesnt have to prove anything to us, but an article in the nytimes about paris participating in the video isn't going to cut it for 2257.

Understood and no arguement.. however... all of the new twist yells that the law is for the protection of minors and to insure that minors aren't being used in sexually explicit content...

Under the law.. the courts must rely on the 'original intent' of a law.. and as such.. the law could only apply if an individual included in sexually explicit content was, in the eyes of the court, questionable insofar as age.

If there was any question whatsoever in the age of P. Hilton, then ol' what's his face, that released the video would be in the courts as we speak instead of livin' life in luxury.. ..

But then I guess there are many laws where the courts forget to consider the original intent... Can you say IRS? .. :)

the new 2257 regs we all read require ALL content, regardless of model's age or fame, to be fully backed by i.d.

that means if i'm shooting 75 year old grannies, i still have to have the i.d., and if i put them on a banner, i have to give them to my affiliates for the affiliates to be within the law. also, according to the lawyers i talked with, if i put a banner on my site with a model, it doesn't matter where it's hosted - only that it's on my website.

assuming those are the regs as they got finalized, paris hilton banners will be no different.

then make sure your banners are not sexually explicit. girls face or in a bra, bikinni etc.

IF they are sexually explicit... But.. I really doubt they'll kick your door down to make sure the 75 year old granny isn't a minor...

Hmmm..

I guess it all means that if I promote an adult video/vod site, I need names, addresses, and copy of drivers licenses of everyone in every video that the sponsor site has for sale...

I have a feeling that Gonzales is goin down on this one...

Thats exactly what it means.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh