2257 made easy...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slapass
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Nov 2002
    • 14625

    #1

    2257 made easy...

    Lets assume that the big maerican companies are going to comply. Now go to a big adult site. Using cum fiesta for the example -

    http://cumfiesta.com/main.htm?id=

    They have this at the bottom of the page -

    All girls appearing on this website are 18 years or older. Click here for records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ยง 2257 Statement. By entering this site you swear that you are of legal age in your area to view adult material and that you wish to view such material. All images on this site as well as the site itself is Copyright Adultprovide.com, all rights reserved.

    The "click here" links to -

    http://service.adultprovide.com/docs/records.htm

    can't I just do the same thing if I am displaying ND content? and repeat it for all of my sponsors?
  • dready
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2002
    • 5247

    #2
    That would work great for the OLD 2257 law.

    You know you've been required to do that for years now!?
    Last edited by dready; 05-19-2005, 10:47 AM.
    ICQ: 91139591

    Comment

    • sumphatpimp
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2002
      • 5235

      #3
      that has nothing to do with the stuff Asshat added.

      Comment

      • slapass
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Nov 2002
        • 14625

        #4
        fuck so this thread just shows I woefully uninformed hehe nice.

        Comment

        • Babaganoosh
          ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
          • Nov 2001
          • 15841

          #5
          Originally posted by sumphatpimp
          that has nothing to do with the stuff Asshat added.
          How do you know? Have you actually seen what was signed or just what was proposed?
          I like pie.

          Comment

          • Mr.Fiction
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2002
            • 9484

            #6
            Are you hosting the content or are you talking about content hosted by Nasty Dollars?
            Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

            Comment

            • AaronM
              GFY Royality ;)
              • Oct 2001
              • 46923

              #7

              LOL...That page is non-compliant.

              Comment

              • dready
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2002
                • 5247

                #8
                Originally posted by Babaganoosh
                How do you know? Have you actually seen what was signed or just what was proposed?

                Here is the 2004 Proposal:
                http://my.execpc.com/~xxxlaw/2257Table.htm
                ICQ: 91139591

                Comment

                • xxxice
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2002
                  • 5042

                  #9
                  USE TEXT

                  Comment

                  • slapass
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Nov 2002
                    • 14625

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dready
                    awesome thanks.

                    Comment

                    • dready
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 5247

                      #11
                      Originally posted by vanderweb
                      USE TEXT
                      Yeah, guys love to jerk it to text porn!
                      ICQ: 91139591

                      Comment

                      • Babaganoosh
                        ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
                        • Nov 2001
                        • 15841

                        #12
                        Originally posted by dready
                        I know what was proposed. Nobody knows what was signed yet.
                        I like pie.

                        Comment

                        • MandyBlake
                          The one and only!
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 17761

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Babaganoosh
                          I know what was proposed. Nobody knows what was signed yet.
                          it seems a lot of people don't understand this point
                          Mandy's Playhouse
                          Her First Fat Girl
                          If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921

                          Comment

                          • GatorB
                            The Demon & 12clicks
                            • Oct 2001
                            • 18208

                            #14
                            Originally posted by MandyBlake
                            it seems a lot of people don't understand this point
                            I doubt what was proposed and what is actually the new rules is very different from each other. I mean why would Bush give us any kind of break.

                            Comment

                            • AaronM
                              GFY Royality ;)
                              • Oct 2001
                              • 46923

                              #15
                              Originally posted by GatorB
                              I doubt what was proposed and what is actually the new rules is very different from each other. I mean why would Bush give us any kind of break.

                              And what exactly does bush have to do with these regulations?

                              He didn't write or approve the proposed regs nor did he sign the current ones.

                              This isn't a Bush issue.

                              Comment

                              • Babaganoosh
                                ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
                                • Nov 2001
                                • 15841

                                #16
                                Originally posted by GatorB
                                I doubt what was proposed and what is actually the new rules is very different from each other. I mean why would Bush give us any kind of break.
                                Well, most proposed laws are drastically different when they are actually signed.
                                I like pie.

                                Comment

                                • Babaganoosh
                                  ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
                                  • Nov 2001
                                  • 15841

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by AaronM
                                  And what exactly does bush have to do with these regulations?

                                  He didn't write or approve the proposed regs nor did he sign the current ones.

                                  This isn't a Bush issue.
                                  Not directly. He did nominate Alberto Gonzales though.
                                  I like pie.

                                  Comment

                                  • AaronM
                                    GFY Royality ;)
                                    • Oct 2001
                                    • 46923

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Babaganoosh
                                    Not directly. He did nominate Alberto Gonzales though.

                                    yeah, I'll give ya that.
                                    Last edited by AaronM; 05-19-2005, 11:50 AM.

                                    Comment

                                    • Nate-MM2
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Sep 2002
                                      • 263

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Babaganoosh
                                      Well, most proposed laws are drastically different when they are actually signed.
                                      But most proposed laws go through a much longer process between the draft and the actual passing of the law than these ones did.

                                      Comment

                                      • slapass
                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                        • Nov 2002
                                        • 14625

                                        #20
                                        The biggest issue the proposed has is the paper work. Every url has to be recorded and cross referenced. This might be easily solved by the paysite having a data collection page. We input the id number of the set and the url, we plaed it on. It then adds it to the database. We link the database on our page. It says the main url has to link to the database. So you could link to the 2257 pages off the main. and each page if you were anal (wanted to be safe).

                                        Comment

                                        • GatorB
                                          The Demon & 12clicks
                                          • Oct 2001
                                          • 18208

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by AaronM
                                          And what exactly does bush have to do with these regulations?

                                          He didn't write or approve the proposed regs nor did he sign the current ones.

                                          This isn't a Bush issue.

                                          Who drew up the rules? Ashcroft. Who signed the rules Gonzales. WHO put both of these guys in their jobs? BUSH. Say Bush had an AG that didn't give a rats ass about porn and just wanted to focus on REAL criminals. Or if Gore had won in 2000. Then these rules never would have existed.

                                          Comment

                                          • joshrube82
                                            Registered User
                                            • Jan 2005
                                            • 67

                                            #22
                                            i dont understand this shit its wack

                                            Comment

                                            • Snake Doctor
                                              I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                              • Mar 2001
                                              • 13449

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by AaronM
                                              And what exactly does bush have to do with these regulations?

                                              He didn't write or approve the proposed regs nor did he sign the current ones.

                                              This isn't a Bush issue.
                                              sig too big

                                              Comment

                                              • Babaganoosh
                                                ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
                                                • Nov 2001
                                                • 15841

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by GatorB
                                                Who drew up the rules? Ashcroft. Who signed the rules Gonzales. WHO put both of these guys in their jobs? BUSH. Say Bush had an AG that didn't give a rats ass about porn and just wanted to focus on REAL criminals. Or if Gore had won in 2000. Then these rules never would have existed.
                                                Actually the Clinton administration drew up and signed the rules. The Bush administration came up with the revisions in 2004.
                                                I like pie.

                                                Comment

                                                • GatorB
                                                  The Demon & 12clicks
                                                  • Oct 2001
                                                  • 18208

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Babaganoosh
                                                  Actually the Clinton administration drew up and signed the rules. The Bush administration came up with the revisions in 2004.
                                                  They never became law. As Janet Reno said in a PBS interview in 2002 about porn "We had better things to do than go after obscenity"

                                                  Comment

                                                  • iBanker
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Dec 2004
                                                    • 2758

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by GatorB
                                                    They never became law. As Janet Reno said in a PBS interview in 2002 about porn "We had better things to do than go after obscenity"
                                                    So wrong, so wrong. Put blame wherever you want, but it is a GOVERNMENT ISSUE, not a party issue. If it makes you feel better, bash away.

                                                    Of you could just get compliant, your choice.
                                                    www.JasonandAlex.com
                                                    Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...