Blocking IPs That Violate New 2257 Regulations - GoFuckYourself.com

t.Dot · 05-19-2005, 06:19 AM

- Have any of you heard of the possibility that government legislation may soon require Internet providers to start BLOCKING traffic/surfers who visit sites that violate the new 2257 update?

- Technically, wouldn't this then BLOCK all US citizens from visiting non-US, non-legal, non-2257 complying sites?

Dirty Dane · 05-19-2005, 06:23 AM

Its already done. In China and Saudi.

Nicky · 05-19-2005, 06:23 AM

if they do that im gonna be mad.....

t.Dot · 05-19-2005, 06:26 AM

Internet/Digital travel via bandwidth should be considered on par, from a legal perspective, with actual physical travel.

A citizen is expected to pay attention to a country's laws when in that country, what makes Internet users any different?

directfiesta · 05-19-2005, 06:48 AM

new business plan: proxie selling

Turf · 05-19-2005, 07:13 AM

why doesnt that come as a big surprise ...

but hot damn thats going to open up a few new jobs.. think about all the people that has to surf to see if a site is up to par with the tons of stuff that opens up every day...

block one paysite, 3 new start up , domains cost near to nothing nowadays.

MandyBlake · 05-19-2005, 07:16 AM

how would they know which ones to block?

Nydahl · 05-19-2005, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t.Dot

Internet/Digital travel via bandwidth should be considered on par, from a legal perspective, with actual physical travel.

A citizen is expected to pay attention to a country's laws when in that country, what makes Internet users any different?

internet was supposed to be the only place where you can "travel" absolutely free without any restriction - that would allow you to discover what you haven't known till now.
I like that idea so I am against any restrictions.

sumphatpimp · 05-19-2005, 07:17 AM

your ip gets blocked at the main name servers that run the internet. for some sites it is alreasy being done.

Wizzo · 05-19-2005, 07:18 AM

I sale short pees....

Furious_Male · 05-19-2005, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t.Dot

Internet/Digital travel via bandwidth should be considered on par, from a legal perspective, with actual physical travel.

A citizen is expected to pay attention to a country's laws when in that country, what makes Internet users any different?

It is safe to say you are for Full Internet Regulation.

Tanker · 05-19-2005, 07:29 AM

that would be absurd

fireorange · 05-19-2005, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t.Dot

Internet/Digital travel via bandwidth should be considered on par, from a legal perspective, with actual physical travel.

A citizen is expected to pay attention to a country's laws when in that country, what makes Internet users any different?

You must be lost, you should join your idiotic friends at: http://www.slashdot.org/

Damian_Maxcash · 05-19-2005, 08:13 AM

Im not sure what the details are but it is pretty close to this in Australia already

I just dont think they will get away with it in the US.... I can actually see people being really pissed about it - demonstrations and that sort of thing

Nate-MM2 · 05-19-2005, 08:30 AM

The US government can't police foreign sites to see if they comply with the new regulations.

Not even the DOJ has a big enough bank-roll to fly out to Yubekhistan 50 times a month to see if the webmasters have all the documents available at the address listed on their websites.

05-19-2005, 06:19 AM	#1
t.Dot So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 174	Blocking IPs That Violate New 2257 Regulations - Have any of you heard of the possibility that government legislation may soon require Internet providers to start BLOCKING traffic/surfers who visit sites that violate the new 2257 update? - Technically, wouldn't this then BLOCK all US citizens from visiting non-US, non-legal, non-2257 complying sites?

05-19-2005, 06:23 AM	#3
Nicky Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 30,069	if they do that im gonna be mad..... __________________ gfynicky @ gmail.com

05-19-2005, 06:48 AM	#5
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 29,676	new business plan: proxie selling __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

05-19-2005, 07:13 AM	#6
Turf Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: ICQ: 64644691 Posts: 1,865	why doesnt that come as a big surprise ... but hot damn thats going to open up a few new jobs.. think about all the people that has to surf to see if a site is up to par with the tons of stuff that opens up every day... block one paysite, 3 new start up , domains cost near to nothing nowadays. __________________ Daddy Strokes - mature men stroking their meat Mature Gay Movies - mature men fucking everyone! Pleasing Daddy - young girls fucking mature men Looking for submitter accounts for older men niche content (both gay and straight) so hit me up if you run a tube and offer submitter accounts for paysites. Last edited by Turf; 05-19-2005 at 07:14 AM..

05-19-2005, 07:16 AM	#7
MandyBlake The one and only! Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 17,761	how would they know which ones to block? __________________ Mandy's Playhouse Her First Fat Girl If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921

05-19-2005, 06:23 AM	#2
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	Its already done. In China and Saudi.

05-19-2005, 06:26 AM	#4
t.Dot So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 174	Internet/Digital travel via bandwidth should be considered on par, from a legal perspective, with actual physical travel. A citizen is expected to pay attention to a country's laws when in that country, what makes Internet users any different?

05-19-2005, 07:17 AM	#9
sumphatpimp Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,235	your ip gets blocked at the main name servers that run the internet. for some sites it is alreasy being done.

05-19-2005, 07:18 AM	#10
Wizzo 2011 GFY Hall of Fame! Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Back in Texas! Posts: 15,224	I sale short pees.... __________________ Looking for Opportunity!

05-19-2005, 07:29 AM	#12
Tanker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada Posts: 9,287	that would be absurd __________________ Tanker ICQ 3427575 CCBTools Now featured in the CCBill.com APP STORE

05-19-2005, 08:13 AM	#14
Damian_Maxcash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MaxCash.com Posts: 12,745	Im not sure what the details are but it is pretty close to this in Australia already I just dont think they will get away with it in the US.... I can actually see people being really pissed about it - demonstrations and that sort of thing

05-19-2005, 08:30 AM	#15
Nate-MM2 So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver, CANADA Posts: 263	The US government can't police foreign sites to see if they comply with the new regulations. Not even the DOJ has a big enough bank-roll to fly out to Yubekhistan 50 times a month to see if the webmasters have all the documents available at the address listed on their websites.