yeah, I can see how tough it would be to get rid of any banner with hardcore content, or that you didn't have records on. idiot.

See, the difference between you and me is that if I have something up that I can't rely on my paperwork, I dump it. Not a problem.

I can hear your story now though . . . "I got arrested because I had a website up that was critical of the Bush Administration." Just like last time.

Bush sucks balls

See, the thing is, he won, by a majority of the popular vote this time around. He has reason to believe that it is the majority of American's values. If you ever listened to Kerry politic, he said the same fucking things as Bush did re: American values.

The wheels were in motion, it did not matter who got elected. Bush is an idiot. Kerry would have been worse though.


And every time they try to bump up the airport security people here and in the news start claiming our personal liberties are being taken away.

However, if you think that there is going to be some negative political backlash to Bush's presidency due to the 2257 regs cutting in on the porn of the people, for the people and by the people, please wrap some of what you are smoking in a few layers of plastic wrap, twp layers of aluminum foil and stick it in a Tupperware container, then ship it to me, I would be forever greatful, and I will support whatever political rant you want to take.

God, lord...how stupid is that? The poilice do a poor enough job keeping real criminals off the street, now they gotta be burdened with worring about some dude roughing up his suspect to some free porn? Fucking genius!

CP is one thing. I would happily reprt that to the police if I had information about it, but this has nothing to do with CP...it is just convienent high moral ground to stand on and has nothing to do with the true intentions.

:error

not that it matters in any way but I am getting air conditioning next week, lol

haha, yeah, I know my city has plenty of surplus money in the budget to have cops stay at the station and surf porn looking for sites that are owned by people in their jurisdiction.

you might think that but some jurisdictions have actually asked for the power to do so in the pass and asscroft denied them... there are plenty of right wing groups that have nothing but time on their hands and will report "obscene" material to anybody that will listen

yeah if anybody else happened to see the interview/speech please chime in but it was obvious that the long term target is anything "obscene" and not just CP....

This is the majority of America: http://www.getupoutmy.biz/daker/

:winkwink: :winkwink:

no wonders people dont like him...hehe

i second that

Okay, I get where you are going. My mistake. Now, would you mind telling me the legal definition of obscene, and what kind of content you are using, or a sponsor who you think meets that definition?

meatcash is softcore

that is a great question... the government won't define what they consider obscene... i sure as hell don't know... those are the terms that gonzalez himself used... the radio industry has been trying to get them to define "obscene" for over a decade and they won't do it.... and as far as I know they won't completely define sexually explicit but i could be wrong on that

not to beat a dead horse but http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=470235 that thread gives you an idea of how they are rallying the troops fpr action.... there isn't any evidence that they are specifically targeting adult webmasters but it shows you that they have the arms to reach out anywhere they want to

Did it ever occur to you that maybe this issue has been addressed before? People have been arguing about what is obscene since the 1830's and constantly since the end of the 1950's.

While you may hate Republicans and Bush, there is a bright spot. Republicans appoint Supreme Court judges, and they appoint conservative judges. I love conservative judges, and believe me, I have more time in front of judges than 98% of the people here (at least), and I know to appreciate a conservative judge.

Conservative judges go by the letter of the law. Liberal judges try to make a name for themself by saying gay marriages are okay, when the law plainly says it isn't (just an example).

The point is, it is the Courts that are going to decide it, and just be glad that we have a conservative Supreme Court that rules in our favor all the time.

the day bush was re-elected was one fo the saddest days no doubt - I can still remember the feeling of shock and dis-belief watching the tv as the totals came in - I still think it was rigged somehow - it just had to be.

No worried :thumbsup

why don't you define "obscene" for me then? by gov't standards please... they won't tell you what is obscene but they will punish you for being obscene... i'm not trying to argue with you but you seem to refuse to belive that the current administration is on the war path to get rid of porn... i heard it straight from the horses mouth this morning... i believe what i heard and if the 2257 stuff isn't shot down then it is gonna get worse and worse... and the last time any of this was fought out in court the dems were in power and it was all different judges

100........

100 :upsidedow

I keep seeing the term "will of the people" posted in these threads... I still want someone to explain to me why it's OK for a slight majority to determine the morals for nearly 1/2 of the rest of the country.

Where I live is still very racist. What if a petition drive showed that a narrow majority of 51% (of people who vote) in the town wanted to change the laws and policies back to the way things were in the early 60's? Would any of you defending the narrow majority political actions also agree that this "majority" should make the call for everyone else? Would you just call everyone complaining a "sore loser"? :Oh crap

Read the new 2257 in the Federal Register today, the fillabuster is over so now Bush is gonna get his Judges, George W's approval drops > 46%, Iraq is still a quagmire...do you still feel good about your vote now?

Fucking idiots.

bumpitty

Yes :winkwink:

if only you had been on the kerry tour bus doing your stand up routine, he'd have won.

Some of us have been keeping these records without these laws in place. It's called being responsible. I don't see a problem whatsoever.

Look here for the answer
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=471428

Yeah, thanks alot you angry red people!

The angry red people voted to get Jesus put on the US flag.

Bloody hell now he thinks people in the porn industry are terrorists :)

These people aren't very smart, don't go making rational points they can't understand. Stick to 4 or 5 word talking points and they'll be able to keep up.

funny... thats EXACTLY what bush had to do with the 8 years of neglect clinton left for him... you know nothing about politics... funny how everyone that votes democratic votes that way because their industry tells them to vote that way. teachers, union workes, porn pushers... sadly as much as you guys want it to (so you can blame someone else for your failure) the future of porn is not going to change. bush is not killing porn, dont be so neive, do you have any idea how much of his funding comes from companys that have invested hundreds of millions in porn, mainstream companies... it didnt happen over the last 4 years and it wont happen over the next 4 years, so what will you fucktards blame your failure on then? funny thing is, i bet 95% of the users on this board arent even regisitered to vote.

yeah, Bush sure did have to clean up that surpluss Clinton left him. :helpme

please kill yourself.

I think he meant the cum stains in the Oval Office ....

it's not hard to have a surplus when you don't tend to any of the problems america is having. is that all it takes to keep you morons happy, a spending surplus, regardless of what a president does (or more importantly doesnt do)... clinton stabbed america in the back soo many times there is not enough cyberspace to mention them all... bush walks into office and all of the sudden he is responsible for the 8 years of shit clinton left him, and like it or not, the last 1.5 years of the clinton administration were not all roses... if it wasnt for the huge tech boom, clinton would have been exposed for the fraud he really is... at least more people would have seen it clearly...

i'd vote for him again if i could

haha, well I certainly would have had the place steam cleaned if I were Bush.

Of course, if I were Bush I'd kill myself and all my friends for the benefit of humanity, but that's a different story.

LET'S SEE HERE:

CLINTON = 8 YEARS OF PEACE AND A ROARING ECONOMY (the man must be punished!)

BUSH = RECESSION, WAR, AND TERRORISM (But at least we have them damn gay folks in check)

I can't believe that 51% of American are that stupid, but (on the other hand) I am not suprised by it either.

i guess the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" notion works for running world power... if you really think clinton had anything to do with a "roaring" economy, then more power to you. bush walked into a recession and has dont an EXCELLENT job of putting this countries economy back together. terrorism? you think bush attacked the towers??? the only thing bush can be held "responsible" for is the war, but who is to say that is a bad thing? regardless, democrats will keep doing what they do best, piss and moaning... if its not about the envoirnment, its abot politics... mean time the republicans will keep this country on top.