why are girls on The Hun ugly, and girls on worldsex so fine??? - GoFuckYourself.com

CancerFactory · 01-23-2002, 04:53 PM

has anyone else noticed this? almost every gallery i see on the hun, the girls are butt ugly, and the picture quality aint that great
on worldsex, itsd a complete opposite. The girls are much finer....
im not imagining this...this is the case almost every single day....im thinking the hun posts ugly gallery pictures on purpose to sell more memberships himself. Anyone else noticed this?

xApster · 01-23-2002, 04:56 PM

I find he posts a lot of newbie galleries

CancerFactory · 01-23-2002, 04:59 PM

yeah, exactly
is he trying to help out the new guys, or is it more of a plot to sell more memberships for himself?

mika · 01-24-2002, 04:44 AM

He posted my wife and you have a bad taste if you say she's ugly..

Seriously I think (!) cause Hun has been around so long that he's seen all the fine girls and doesnt post overused content.

There are awesome sites out there and many wonder why dont they grow as big as hun.

Well no matter how fine the girls are, who wants to masturbate with the pics of the same girls month after month

Trax · 01-24-2002, 05:25 AM

i don't think you can say that the hun lists ugly shit flat.. i just noticed that a gallerymaking newbie gets listed with a lot of shit galleries

grumpy · 01-24-2002, 05:32 AM

Why do you think the huns sells memberships?
I know for a fact that he doesnt. So before you start to accuse anyone get your facts right shithead. Or do uou work for Worldsex. Is this some shit thread to get more traffic on worldsex or to discreted the hun

SR · 01-24-2002, 06:03 AM

I don't think he posts that much newbie galleries.
But it is cool that he gives everyone a change to make a few bucks.

Trax · 01-24-2002, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by grumpy
Or do uou work for Worldsex. Is this some shit thread to get more traffic on worldsex or to discreted the hun

lol shut up

Heinrich · 01-24-2002, 06:26 AM

it's because of reviewers i think
on worldsex they like high quality of pics
like celebs, pornstar or glamour shoot type

the hun reviewer like very simple layout
( 12-20 pics 2 link to sponsor)

and will try to list every simple gallery that they got
no matter what the niche is ( amateur, voyeur and other weird niche )

Thumbelina · 01-24-2002, 06:46 AM

Fuck that shit, I saw the picks from worldsex and they were posted on The HUN last month..........

Get your head out of the can and get your facts straight.

titmowse · 01-24-2002, 06:52 AM

you mean the girls have faces?

funkmaster · 01-24-2002, 07:02 AM

"I know for a fact that he doesnt."

LOL / IFBOMCL ...

01-23-2002, 04:53 PM	#1
CancerFactory Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 270	why are girls on The Hun ugly, and girls on worldsex so fine??? has anyone else noticed this? almost every gallery i see on the hun, the girls are butt ugly, and the picture quality aint that great on worldsex, itsd a complete opposite. The girls are much finer.... im not imagining this...this is the case almost every single day....im thinking the hun posts ugly gallery pictures on purpose to sell more memberships himself. Anyone else noticed this?

01-24-2002, 05:32 AM	#6
grumpy Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Holland Posts: 9,870	Why do you think the huns sells memberships? I know for a fact that he doesnt. So before you start to accuse anyone get your facts right shithead. Or do uou work for Worldsex. Is this some shit thread to get more traffic on worldsex or to discreted the hun __________________ Don't let greediness blur your vision \| You gotta let some shit slide icq - 441-456-888

01-24-2002, 06:46 AM	#10
Thumbelina Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 675	Fuck that shit, I saw the picks from worldsex and they were posted on The HUN last month.......... Get your head out of the can and get your facts straight. __________________ <a href="http://www.bimbolinks.com"><img src="http://www.12circle.com/banners/bimbo_120x60.jpg"border="0"></a><BR>

01-24-2002, 06:52 AM	#11
titmowse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: TEXAS Posts: 5,320	you mean the girls have faces? __________________ I still love everybody

01-23-2002, 04:56 PM	#2
xApster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 1,188	I find he posts a lot of newbie galleries

01-23-2002, 04:59 PM	#3
CancerFactory Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 270	yeah, exactly is he trying to help out the new guys, or is it more of a plot to sell more memberships for himself?

01-24-2002, 04:44 AM	#4
mika Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Finland Posts: 1,561	He posted my wife and you have a bad taste if you say she's ugly.. Seriously I think (!) cause Hun has been around so long that he's seen all the fine girls and doesnt post overused content. There are awesome sites out there and many wonder why dont they grow as big as hun. Well no matter how fine the girls are, who wants to masturbate with the pics of the same girls month after month

01-24-2002, 05:25 AM	#5
Trax [----------------------] Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 14,486	i don't think you can say that the hun lists ugly shit flat.. i just noticed that a gallerymaking newbie gets listed with a lot of shit galleries

01-24-2002, 06:03 AM	#7
SR Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 2,239	I don't think he posts that much newbie galleries. But it is cool that he gives everyone a change to make a few bucks.

01-24-2002, 06:26 AM	#9
Heinrich Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 207	it's because of reviewers i think on worldsex they like high quality of pics like celebs, pornstar or glamour shoot type the hun reviewer like very simple layout ( 12-20 pics 2 link to sponsor) and will try to list every simple gallery that they got no matter what the niche is ( amateur, voyeur and other weird niche )

01-24-2002, 07:02 AM	#12
funkmaster So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: shell beach Posts: 7,938	"I know for a fact that he doesnt." LOL / IFBOMCL ...