Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2005, 01:02 PM   #1
GeorgeK
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 423
Open STATS: In the spirit of sharing --- free business idea

In the spirit of sharing (Greek Orthodox Easter Sunday is tomorrow, be thankful that we're all blessed), here's an idea for someone who is enterprising, and knows some PHP/XML.

Problem: Most of us here have multiple sponsors, and it's a pain to check stats regularly....multiple usernames/passwords, etc. Additionally, many of us are paranoid, and wouldn't trust a central aggregator to unify those stats.

Solution: Write a PHP script with open standards (like XML) and a simple documented interface that would allow the sponsors themselves to "push" stats to our own hosted sites, as they're produced. That script would then allow us to see total stats for all sponsors.

e.g. on my own domain, I would post the script in say:

http://example.com/stats/

I'd give a sponsor, say Adult.com, 3-things:
a) a username (e.g. adult)
b) password (abcdefgh)
c) updater url (e.g. http://example.com/stats/update.php )

Every hour (or however stats are updated by that sponsor), Adult.com would hit my server with a stats update, in a URL like:

http://example.com/stats/update.php?...e=20 05/04/30

Above URL got squished, here is it broken over several lines:

http://example.com/stats/update.php?u=adult
&p=abcdefgh&revs=1234.56&date=2005/04/30

In the above, it means that the revenues were $1234.56, and posted for the date April 30, 2004.

Earlier in the day, say at 5 am, revs might have been $225, and throughout the day, as stats update, the number would typically go up. "Final" stats for 2005/04/30 could always be posted a few days later (i.e. that's why the sponsor would pass the time as part of the string).

For added security, folks could always use SSL, i.e. https://

Other sponsors, e.g. CJ.com, Google AdSense, DomainSponsor, Linkshare, Nastydollars, PartyPoker, etc. would be given their own usernames and passwords.

I could then login to http://example.com/stats/ (with my own username and password), to view unified stats:

Name Amount Last Update
------------------------------------------------------
adult.com $1,234.56 11:55 am
Google Adsense $805.31 10:47 am
Party Poker $205.00 3:00 am

If the spec and interface was simple, and enough sponsors could be brought on board, we'd all be able to see our stats in one place, securely on our own servers. Charge a low price for the script (or free, in exchange for goodwill for your firm), and don't forget who to thank for the idea later.

Sponsors also benefit, as they don't have a gazillion people hitting their servers all the time to check stats. They'd simply "push" the stats to us in a standard format, as they're available, on a regular schedule. Bandwidth to send that above URL is a lot less than having folks log in every hour or two to check stats.

The key is getting industry support behind the idea. Any sponsors here willing to "push" stats to their clients like this, given how trivial the above is to be coded into their systems? Post here, and maybe in a month or two, we'll all have a few extra hours per week on our hands, from not checking stats.

P.S. I donate the above spec to the world. You can make money off the implementation, or value-added (like putting fancy daily graphs, etc.), but the basic spec is open to all.
__________________
I buy good domain names. Send lists to George (at) LOFFS.com
GeorgeK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 01:07 PM   #2
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,476
Is there a particular reason why you wanted sponsors to push stats rather than webmasters fetching them? It seems better to me that a webmaster would fetch the xml feed on request rather than a sponsor push. Other than that, I like the idea.
WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 01:10 PM   #3
GeorgeK
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 423
Webmasters would typically abuse things, by checking every 5 minutes, lol. But, I guess that *could* be a more advanced option, too. It would be like having a RSS feed from our sponsors, if we can fetch it from them on our own schedule (but, it would need to be done in a secure manner, as we don't want other webmasters checking our stats).
__________________
I buy good domain names. Send lists to George (at) LOFFS.com
GeorgeK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 01:13 PM   #4
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeK
Webmasters would typically abuse things, by checking every 5 minutes, lol. But, I guess that *could* be a more advanced option, too. It would be like having a RSS feed from our sponsors, if we can fetch it from them on our own schedule (but, it would need to be done in a secure manner, as we don't want other webmasters checking our stats).
I think it makes more sense to do a pull rather than a push, simply so that those who need stats more often can get it and those with less stats-paranoia can check it less frequently (I'm one of those 5 min people, lol). And yes, I assume all requests would need to verify username/passwords prior to returning data results.

WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 01:17 PM   #5
GeorgeK
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 423
The reason why "push" makes more sense, to me, is that the sponsors know exactly when their stats update (most do it in a batch every hour or few hours). Thus, it reduces load on their system by only pushing the stats to you when the stats update. You don't lose any detail.

By "pulling" the stats, you might make the load on their servers high, especially if they calculate stats in real-time (it would constantly thrash their databases). "Pushing" gives the sponsors more control (and a reason to implement the above). They can push every hour or two, if stats update in real-time. Or, they can push at the exact interval of their batch updates, if their stats are calculated in batches.
__________________
I buy good domain names. Send lists to George (at) LOFFS.com
GeorgeK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 01:19 PM   #6
GeorgeK
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 423
With "pull", you get the problem some RSS publishers have, where there's essentially a DDOS attack on their servers at the top of every hour. See:

http://slashdot.org/articles/04/07/2...4.shtml?tid=95
__________________
I buy good domain names. Send lists to George (at) LOFFS.com
GeorgeK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 01:21 PM   #7
pstation
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,135
Nice idea, i doubt you will get very many sponsors that would actually push stats to you, seems better to just run a cron job at whever interval to check em
pstation is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 02:54 PM   #8
Brujah
Beer Money Baron
 
Brujah's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
Some sponsors send out emails whenever a sale is made, once a day, etc... frequency depending on the webmaster preference. Sponsors like this may not mind doing an XML push to a URL instead. I don't think theres a concern for a DDOS like effect with RSS as there just aren't that many affiliates as say an "anyone can subscribe" situation, that would participate anyway.

Existing programs like StatsRemote pull already. There's an open source version of this I believe too. ARS has their own remote which is nice. An RSS / XML feed from them that can be polled would be great.
__________________
Brujah is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 03:07 PM   #9
adonthenet
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
adonthenet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,753
looks good . im not sure if it will fit.
adonthenet is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 03:08 PM   #10
Michaelious
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,720
not too shabby mate!
__________________
Michaelious is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 03:10 PM   #11
galleryseek
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,234
i'm just starting to heavily get into the adult webmaster side of things... on a seperate issue from what you've discussed, i was wondering if there was/could be a way to build a universal system that would rid the problem of shaving by placing code on their tours/join pages. i'm sure this has been thought of 1,000 times over already, but i'm wondering where people stand on this. if it were build fullproof - pressure would be placed upon sponsors to use it. the question is though, is there a fullproof way? the code would need to remain on a seperate server so it couldn't be altered.
galleryseek is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 03:10 PM   #12
Rui
web
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: On icq: 85-483-060
Posts: 9,533
Good idea, this is not the sort of thing i'm used to see at GFY ;)

I agree that having the sponsor decide the "refreshes" is much better since it will not cause thousands of webmasters exploiting the servers checking their stats all the time

stat-olics sucks..and sadly i'm one of them :S
Rui is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 04:11 PM   #13
Chris
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: icq: 71462500 Skype: Jupzchris
Posts: 27,880
I just dont see a sponsor wantaing to push the stats for you when they have there own perfectly good working stats on there own servers that you can check your self in real time?
__________________
[email protected]
Chris is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.