Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2005, 02:17 AM   #1
Huggles
GFY'S #1 retard
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 11,118
Canon 20D lense choice advice!

Hi there



As some of you know, I'm about to buy a 20D for car/girl photos, indoor, cramped space photos ( no / little room for lights ) and outdoor shots.



I'm going to order the stuff tomorrow, and so far here is the lense I have chosen based on the advice of the all wise Aaron M, and the dude on the phone at the camera place:


http://www.adencamera.com/prod-overv...125&Category=7


What do you think? Any other Canon lenses I should look at?


Thanks for all of your advice!
__________________
https://3-veo.com/
The best AI video maker portal.
Huggles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 02:22 AM   #2
parazzi
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Francisco - Bay Area
Posts: 101
i use a 50mm 1.4 prime on all my shoots. that 24-70L zoom is a great lens
parazzi is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 02:32 AM   #3
Huggles
GFY'S #1 retard
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 11,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by parazzi
i use a 50mm 1.4 prime on all my shoots. that 24-70L zoom is a great lens

Yeah the salesman told me it would be the only lense I would ever need! Of course, he's trying to sell me a $1600 dollar lense...
__________________
https://3-veo.com/
The best AI video maker portal.
Huggles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 02:38 AM   #4
Makingcoin
Confirmed User
 
Makingcoin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Ditch
Posts: 8,919
Good choice on the camera bro, that lens looks pretty slick too.
__________________

www.MAKINGCOIN.com

icq. 166-662-831
"Start making large coin!"


Daddy I Get Paid To Be A Whore - Coming Soon
Makingcoin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 02:59 AM   #5
Huggles
GFY'S #1 retard
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 11,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makingcoin
Good choice on the camera bro, that lens looks pretty slick too.


I might be moving downtown soon too.



Not looking forward to "steal anything" underground parking.
__________________
https://3-veo.com/
The best AI video maker portal.
Huggles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 03:04 AM   #6
ChewbaCreative
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,118
maybe CANON EF28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM + CANON EF50mm f/1.4 USM and you save $800
__________________

high design. high creative. adultcreative
ChewbaCreative is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 03:15 AM   #7
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Just remember that on your 20D a 24mm focal length will be the same as a 38.4mm lens on a full frame/film camera, due to the smaller sensor.

Are you ordering by mail or can you go in and see it?

You could probably even get away with the 18-55mm EF-S kit lens for starters, and figure out where you need to go from there. Better to spend +$150 on the kit lens than $1600 on your L glass and realise the zoom range isn't sufficient...?
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 03:20 AM   #8
Huggles
GFY'S #1 retard
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 11,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowan
Just remember that on your 20D a 24mm focal length will be the same as a 38.4mm lens on a full frame/film camera, due to the smaller sensor.

Are you ordering by mail or can you go in and see it?

You could probably even get away with the 18-55mm EF-S kit lens for starters, and figure out where you need to go from there. Better to spend +$150 on the kit lens than $1600 on your L glass and realise the zoom range isn't sufficient...?


Uhhh, uhhhh.... Beavis, uhhh



I don't get it



Although, will I really need much zoom since the camera has a crazy ass 8 MP resolution?
__________________
https://3-veo.com/
The best AI video maker portal.
Huggles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 03:35 AM   #9
abyss_al
**LOOKING FOR TRADES**
 
abyss_al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 15,605
if you're gonna have cramped space, i'd go with a wider angle lense.. maybe 18mm? and closer ratio to 1 (1:1) the better... but they get expensive
__________________
EMAIL: allen @ vasmediagroup.com | ICQ: 311329761 | SKYPE: abyss.al | AIM: xABYSSxALx
abyss_al is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 03:51 AM   #10
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggles
Uhhh, uhhhh.... Beavis, uhhh



I don't get it



Although, will I really need much zoom since the camera has a crazy ass 8 MP resolution?
The low end Canon sensors have what is called a 1.6 times crop factor, which means that you have to multiply the focal length that is printed on the lens by 1.6. If you put the lens on a normal film body and then onto your 20D it's like you've zoomed in 1.6 times.

So it's not the telephoto (zoom) end of the range you have to worry about - you may find yourself in a situation where you can't "pull back" any further...

I found even 18mm wasn't wide enough on my 1.6X crop camera, so I went for a 12-24mm lens. That's a fairly extreme change though, if you're doing portraits you probably don't want to go that wide.
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 03:54 AM   #11
Makingcoin
Confirmed User
 
Makingcoin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Ditch
Posts: 8,919
Quote:
I might be moving downtown soon too.



Not looking forward to "steal anything" underground parking.
Awesome bro, underground parking is a nightmare down here. I just leave the top off my car when I park it, I don't need anymore broken windows.
__________________

www.MAKINGCOIN.com

icq. 166-662-831
"Start making large coin!"


Daddy I Get Paid To Be A Whore - Coming Soon
Makingcoin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 03:55 AM   #12
abyss_al
**LOOKING FOR TRADES**
 
abyss_al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 15,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowan
The low end Canon sensors have what is called a 1.6 times crop factor, which means that you have to multiply the focal length that is printed on the lens by 1.6. If you put the lens on a normal film body and then onto your 20D it's like you've zoomed in 1.6 times.

So it's not the telephoto (zoom) end of the range you have to worry about - you may find yourself in a situation where you can't "pull back" any further...

I found even 18mm wasn't wide enough on my 1.6X crop camera, so I went for a 12-24mm lens. That's a fairly extreme change though, if you're doing portraits you probably don't want to go that wide.

did the 12mm give you a fish eye effect?
__________________
EMAIL: allen @ vasmediagroup.com | ICQ: 311329761 | SKYPE: abyss.al | AIM: xABYSSxALx
abyss_al is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 04:00 AM   #13
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
Great lens. any L series lens is going to rock.
If you want to shoot GonzoVision style content, get yourself a fisheye.

For wideangle, you can't go past the 16-35 f3.5 L
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 04:32 AM   #14
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by abyss_al
did the 12mm give you a fish eye effect?
No, it's a rectilinear lens and there's very little barrel distortion, so if you're pointing at a vertical or horizontal line it stays straight. There is another kind of issue though - perspective distortion. If you point your lens too far off the vertical horizon then the edges start leaning inwards:



It's not necessarily bad, sometimes I think those crazy diagonals add to the image:



One problem with ultra wide lenses is that subjects off-centre tend to get stretched towards the edges, which might make some content girls upset. "Does this lens make me look fat?"
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 04:56 AM   #15
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
yeah, i'd say 12mm is overboard for content.
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:00 AM   #16
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
sigma 24-70 2.8 its a great lens and about $500
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:30 AM   #17
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404
sigma 24-70 2.8 its a great lens and about $500
Has nothing on the Canon L series though..
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:53 AM   #18
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantum-x
Has nothing on the Canon L series though..
actually if you go the photography boards they say its very close and when you consider the price is less than half its a great deal.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 08:11 AM   #19
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,829
we use the canon ef 24-70 lens - it makes great pics but a bit more zoom would be cool. looking for some addition right now
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 08:23 AM   #20
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404
actually if you go the photography boards they say its very close and when you consider the price is less than half its a great deal.
Yeah, it depends on what purpose you're using it for.
Most lenses, you wont notice on your 6x8 prints.

If you're a picky bastard, or blow up your photos, then you'll see the L series glass doing you justice
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 08:32 AM   #21
EROTEEK
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Transylvania...no kidding
Posts: 419
well, if you want a larger lens, and youa are not very keen of the ideea of spending 1.6k on a Canon L, I advise you to look at the following:

Sigma 18-125 EXDG - my fave price/performance related
Canon 18-55 kit lens - el cheapo
Tokina 12-24/4 - around 500$ new
Sigma 12-24
Canon 10-22
__________________
EROTEEK STUDIOS

Yahoo: Eroteek_Studios
ICQ: 346685131
CUSTOM AND EXCLUSIVE CONTENT
EROTEEK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 12:33 PM   #22
Huggles
GFY'S #1 retard
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 11,118
So everyone agrees the L-series will kick ass for doing single-girl-site style shoots?



I am going to buy it in 30 minutes.
__________________
https://3-veo.com/
The best AI video maker portal.
Huggles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 12:40 PM   #23
AaronM
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AaronM's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggles
So everyone agrees the L-series will kick ass for doing single-girl-site style shoots?



I am going to buy it in 30 minutes.

Please tell me that you are talking about 1600 cad because if not, you are paying too much.
AaronM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 12:59 PM   #24
Huggles
GFY'S #1 retard
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 11,118
$1600 cnd!


__________________
https://3-veo.com/
The best AI video maker portal.
Huggles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 01:23 PM   #25
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantum-x
Yeah, it depends on what purpose you're using it for.
Most lenses, you wont notice on your 6x8 prints.

If you're a picky bastard, or blow up your photos, then you'll see the L series glass doing you justice
That's a good point. Do you need top quality glass when all of your images will end up at 1024 pixels max on the longest side in a members area?
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 01:25 PM   #26
abyss_al
**LOOKING FOR TRADES**
 
abyss_al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 15,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowan
No, it's a rectilinear lens and there's very little barrel distortion, so if you're pointing at a vertical or horizontal line it stays straight. There is another kind of issue though - perspective distortion. If you point your lens too far off the vertical horizon then the edges start leaning inwards:



It's not necessarily bad, sometimes I think those crazy diagonals add to the image:



One problem with ultra wide lenses is that subjects off-centre tend to get stretched towards the edges, which might make some content girls upset. "Does this lens make me look fat?"

cool shit... thanx
__________________
EMAIL: allen @ vasmediagroup.com | ICQ: 311329761 | SKYPE: abyss.al | AIM: xABYSSxALx
abyss_al is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 01:45 PM   #27
FelixFlow
Confirmed User
 
FelixFlow's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,779
Canon 24-70 2.8 "L"
__________________


ICQ: 643 339 687

FelixFlow is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 02:50 PM   #28
vickyQ
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 141
get canon 17-40/f4 L, Canon 50/1.8 and possibly the 24-70/L if you want to have zoom for the higher range. Also, many people (michael reichman too - www.luminous-landscapes.com) like the canon 17-85 lens. not a L grade lens but when you ask a question like this I assume you are not a pro and will be satisfied with this one as well.
__________________
Hosting, domain name registrations and server security

contact us for custom hosting offer
vickyQ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 02:53 PM   #29
Huggles
GFY'S #1 retard
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 11,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by vickyQ
I assume you are not a pro and will be satisfied with this one as well.






I don't even know how to use a lense



You'll be seeing me begging someone on the boards to teach me how to download the pics from the camera to my laptop
__________________
https://3-veo.com/
The best AI video maker portal.
Huggles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 02:57 PM   #30
vickyQ
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 141
I did not mean to offend you nor make fun of you. I'm not a pro myself and many times I asked for help on the internet.

I gave you my opinion - for crowded space the 17mm at the widest end is a wise choice...
__________________
Hosting, domain name registrations and server security

contact us for custom hosting offer
vickyQ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.