|
Quote:
A powerful telescope wouldn't allow you to see further in the past, unless it was moved further away faster than the speed of light, as noted before, or aimed at a reflection of the original light (hint!). Purely from our point of view, the telescope would only allow you to see closer towards the object's present. |
Quote:
It would be pretty hard for me to come up with any plausible theories without at least touching some of Einstein's. Interesting thing though: I had taken a few IQ test in the past for some jobs and even though they were not allowed to give out scores, I was told on each occasion that I had the highest score they'd ever seen. I never put much weight on that, I mean who knows if the other applicants were just weak or not. But I recently took another IQ test out of curiosity and got to see my score this time. I shit in my pants when I was told what Einstien's IQ score was. All I will say about it is that Einstien would have enjoyed talking to me. |
I couldn't be fucked debunking you, we all know it's bs
|
Quote:
|
Interesting thread. I basically agree that time travel is only possible in an astral sense. There are some misconceptions...
First, particles can travel faster than the speed of light. On Earth, light does not travel at 186,000 miles per second. In water, it travels even slower. So it's possible to accelerate a particle faster than the speed of light in a medium where light travels considerably slower than c. When this happens, a magnificant blue or green glowing light emerges and is equivalent to a visible shock wave. It's quite intense - Time is really the difference between chaos and harmony. It may sound like a simplistic definition, but consider that scientists view time as entropy, or as energy being disorganized through heat. This means they view the world as constantly progressing towards chaos (2nd law of thermodynamics). I highly disagree with this, as the purpose of anyone's life is to create more stability, and that purpose is shared by the universe. Plus you can see this in particle accelerators. Particle physics is actually a legitimate hoax created by physicists who dreamt up explanations of why a pion turns into a muon and then an electron. A glimpse of an omega, a tauon, a muon or such particle is simply a flash back in time. As for the mind, it technically operates at reverse time or negative entropy. It exists in a constant state of macroscopic quantum coherence. There is no speed of thought, because one thought can be slow while 1000 thoughts in the same quantum wave function is both 1 and infinite at the same time. It is the idea of silience of the mind, focus, or left-right brain synchronization. Electric current is very slow, normally it barely moves at all. For the acceleration comment, you must first eliminate acceleration (and thus friction) to be able to physically exceed the speed of c in a vacuum. Eliminating acceleration is a key to opening Pandora's box. Finally, the big bang theory is not inoperable in quantum physics. People think of quantum physics as some mystical phenomenon that is only recent. It's not. Understanding of quantum mechanics is what proved the Big Bang. Furthermore, the speed of light is not a limit, rather it is a divider. Most importantly, everything I am saying is supported by religion/spirituality. Prior to the Big Bang, there was no time and All That Is existed as 1. Creation was the act of sharing the infinite light with itself. In order to do so, part of the infinite had to condense into form, to create a vessel to receive light. This is when the Godhead condensed, which is literally a roadmap back to the source. At the beginning, the universe was full of dense, chaotic energy, which as it spread out became more coherent and stable. This was the beginning of time. Their is no end of time, only infinite time. This is when we have reached an ultimate balance between form and source, a state of universal superconducting fields (where the Godhead leads us). In this reality, electrons may exist at a more evolved state with a cosmic bosonic nature. It would be mind induced molecular manufacturing on an intense and interactive level. A Kundalini awakening of the universe; a realization that we are much more than you or I. This world would be like a constant shifting of unified quantum wave functions, where thoughts are the construct of perception and physical reality. Heaven isn't in the stars, it's in our mind and on Earth. |
Quote:
Yes, our mind is like a dumb terminal in a sense. It is the connection to the hyperluminal world (or termination point of). We can ignore it (and believe death is death) or embrace it (and discover life is eternal). You are right about the past and future, along with every possible event already existing. When you are consciously thinking you are either in the past or the future, but never in the infinite moment that is the past or future (which few have experienced). A somewhat cheap analogy would be a multiplex theater and the ability to get up and watch/experience other movies anytime. Although it's hard to quantify the personal experience of a past moment, so changing it wouldn't alter the person's zero-point personality. Meaning that superficial events that happened to us may never be erased, but our ultimate energy state will exist without them and because of them. Finally, great explanation of the 'eternal void moment'. When we are looking up in the sky, we are actually looking into a reflective mirror of sorts. What has happened above, is happening inside us. There is no outerspace independent of what is inside our mind. It's impossible to be millions of miles away from something that is inside us. |
there are some seriously dumb people in this thread.
time travel is possible in einsteins universe! |
nice read. But is it true, who knows?
|
hehe listen to relict radiation and you understand theory of traveling in time :)
|
after reading this thread, i have realized that I need to go back to November 22, 1955 and take the Sports Almanac from Griff Tannen to prevent dangerous changed to the real 1985.
|
Quote:
Blackmonsters; i just mean that it sounds like what you've done is just taken Einstein's existing theory of relativity and applied it to another situation. Pretty cleverly done too, if you ask me. |
too long for me to read!!
|
Quote:
|
haha that's funny :)
|
For those who need something to do:
Download the script in my sig and make some money. The script is far more solid than any of my theories and it's free. The GetThumbs script automates the process of making customized thumbs for all your hosted galleries, builds your site, ranks thumbs by popularity so the best thumbs go to the top and get clicked more and updates your site with new thumbs on a schedule you control. Once it's set up you only keep adding gallery urls and click go. You can paste 200 galleries into the script at once and minutes later build a site with those thumbs linked to the galleries. COOL....try it. PS: It does not skim any traffic; this is mostly a beta test to improve the pay version; but you can still let me refer you some new sponsors and or place a link to the getthumbs site if you like to. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and of course there is the fact that you are talking about abstract ideas... and they were talking in mathematics... so unless you brush up on your addition and subtraction, you will never touch on anything that matters... either post the math ... or start a cult. |
thanks for the interesting read
|
I watched a great movie the other day about time travel, its called "primer"
you guys should check it out |
Quote:
Quote:
|
They sky will be blue in the future.
I see blue. Therefore, I see the future. C'mon, man, you can do better than this! |
Quote:
|
im from the year 3024
i came back to this point to tell you all this method will not work idiot |
Quote:
|
I am back from the future. I've successfully stolen the Grays Sports Alamanac from Griff Tannen. All is well and 1985 is back to normal.
http://www.pangilinan.net/starwars/grayscover.jpg |
This has been one of the most interesting threads in a while...
|
Quote:
http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=454185 |
http://www.recongames.com/images/Mentok.jpg
..wait.. wait.. I'm getting something.. Oh yeah, no maths or physics in your theories. false alarm. |
Quote:
(RIL+SOT/2)/MPOR=AAC... RIL : Rapid Image Processing SOT: Speed Of Thought MPOR: Manditory Point Of Repetition AAC: Attracts Asshole Critics who can produce no evidence to the contray either with ot without the quaifications they state is required of my evidence. This is your brain:) This is your brain after my theory:food-smil |
Quote:
|
Don't most people call this Deja Vu?
|
|
Say hi to Captain Kirk for me........
|
You give no theory.
I will listen to you when you publish your studies, with accompanying pages of equations and mathematical functions. Until then you can string things together and call them 'proof' as much as you want. |
Quote:
|
again this guy is smoking crack! lol
|
STP, STOP, I just figured something, it's all wrong, OMG, it's all WRONG !!!
Demonstration: The coefficients of the power series solutions of certain non-linear differential equations are generated by convolutions of the preceeding coefficients. One example is the differential equation x x'' + a (x')^2 = b (1) Among the solutions of this equation (with appropriate choices of a,b) are exp(t), sin(t), cos(t), (A+Bt)^n, A+Bt+Ct^2, and sqrt(A+Bt+Ct^2). This last function represents the separation between any two objects in unaccelerated motion. Other solutions include the cycloid relation for (non-rotating) gravitational free-fall, and the radial distance of a mass from a central point about which it revolves with constant angular velocity and radial freedom. The power series solution of equation (1) can be written x(t) = c[0] + c[1] t + c[2] t^2 + c[3] t^3 + ... where the coefficients c[i] satisfy the convolutions n / b if n = 2 SUM A(k,n-k) c[k] c[n-k] = ( k=0 \ 0 if n > 2 with A(k,j) = (a-1) j (k-j) + k(k-1)/2 Any choice of c[0], c[1], c[2], and c[3], with c[1]c[2] not zero, determines the values of a,b and therefore all the remaining coefficients. There are many interesting things about these sequences of c[k] values. Focusing on just the sequences with |c[k]| = 1, k=0,1,2,3, there are obviously 16 possible choices, but only 8 up to a simple sign change. These 8 can be arranged as four groups of 2: k I II III IV --- -------- ---------- --------- --------- 0 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 2 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 3 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 4 1/2 1/2 3/2 -3/2 0 0 1 1 5 1/2 -1/2 5/2 5/2 4/5 -4/5 1 -1 6 -3/2 -3/2 9/2 -9/2 2/5 2/5 1 1 7 3/2 -3/2 19/2 19/2 -2/5 2/5 1 -1 8 3/8 3/8 133/8 -133/8 -1/2 -1/2 1 1 9 -29/8 29/8 267/8 267/8 1/30 -1/30 1 -1 etc Yhe coefficients in each group differ only in sign. The coefficients in groups I and II diverge, and those in group IV are all units. Only the group III sequences converge. Interestingly, these coefficients are given very closely by c[k-1] = 2 exp(ku) sin(kw) for k>2, where u = -0.145370157... / 1.877672951... for III(a) w = ( \ 1.263919649... for III(b) Notice that the two possible values of w sum to 3.1415926... The integer numerators and denominators of these c[k] sequences also have many interesting properties. For example, primes p congruent to +1 (mod 4) first appear in the denominator at c[p], whereas primes congruent to -1 (mod 4) first appear at c[p^2]. The sequence of numerators is much less regular 1 -1 -1 1 0 -4 2 2 -1 -1 59 -9 -1 233 8 -934 49 .. etc Incidentally, the value of b in the ubiquitous equation (1) is essentially just a constant of integration, and the underlying relation is the derivitive x x'' + q x' x'' = 0 where q=3 for unaccelerated separations and q=2 for (non-rotating) gravitational separations. Isolating q and differentiating again leads to the basic relation, free of arbitrary constants, x x' x'' x'''' - x x' (x'')^2 - x (x'')^2 x''' + (x')^2 x'' x''' = 0 Dividing by x x' x'' x''' gives the nice form x'''' x''' x'' x' ------ - ----- - ---- + ----- = 0 x''' x'' x' x see what i mean??? |
I just plugged that into my Transmeta Hyper Accelerator, and wow! I'm posting from the future.
:D |
Fassinating Captain!
|
Quote:
|
if time exists then you must be already traveling from one point of time to another.
if you say time doesn't exists and that you're always in state of "now" then time traveling isn't an option because "now" expands through the life span. take for instance one of the oldest human languages, sanskrit, it doesnt have past nor future tense. pleople speaking sanskrit believed there is only one continues tense which is "now". |
I have been to the future.
My Name is John Tittor! |
I dream.... therefore I am!
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123