![]() |
Quote:
|
http://media.sensationcontent.com/ro...rvermatrix.gif
First thought: they've deliberately disabled data logging. My servers are back up but the graphs are still 'stuck' on that current reading |
Quote:
99.9% uptime - about 45 mins downtime per month (this outage will exceed that) 100% uptime - well... :Graucho |
Quote:
They are huuuuge. http://www.theplanet.com/datacenter.html I have a server at Servermatrix the discount part of theplanet and this is the first serious downtime I´ve had in 15 months. Combined I think I have 30 minutes max downtime until now :) |
Ain't it a kick in the balls to wake up to this shit i'm down right now Time to get some backup servers in at least 3 different places.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This must be a serious fuckup by someone or something. Their redundancy has obviously not worked. Both my servermatrix servers were unreachable for about 71 minutes. |
Quote:
all others are 99.9%(going off google cache) im sure they'll be all set at 80% soon, which might be why the site is currently down and their network is back online |
Quote:
|
For utterly unreliable, huge downtime, incompetant service, visit
www.reliablehosting.com By far the worst hosting company I have ever dealt with. :disgust |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
was there an explaination as to what happened?
|
Quote:
If you need the extra GBs badly write a ticket about it and I am sure they will add a couple extra GB this month. |
Quote:
|
At approx. 4:15 AM CST, a pair of redundant Powerware 500KVA UPS units failed - creating a power failure in Section B of our D2 datacenter. Emergency teams were deployed within minutes and power was restored, however intermittent power outages have continued to occur until 6:45 AM CST. Powerware, JT Packard, and electricians are currently onsite with over 100 Planet technicians working to resolve the issue. We do NOT anticipate any futher outages. A formal RFO will be released once the team debriefs. We apologize for all the issues this has caused you.
We will be performing a sweep of the data center as soon as this issue is completely resolved to reboot and ensure connectivity of all Active servers. Thank you for your patience in this matter. |
Quote:
82.36.139.111 - - [31/Mar/2005:20:13:50 +1000] "GET /showgal.php?srcdom=&link=new&th=tn1585.jpg HTTP/1.1" 302 5 http://www.****/tgp.html 28275 0 84.216.55.32 - - [31/Mar/2005:21:23:27 +1000] "GET /tgp.html HTTP/1.1" 200 24096 - 113 1 These are two sequential lines from my raw server logs clearly showing the gap. |
Quote:
mine was down for about 5 hours |
Quote:
Did your server(s) get rebooted? |
i am 100% sure and my server got rebooted twice. however its up again, but very very slow
|
umm umm power issues that's rough
|
from 4am to almost 9am one of my servers flatlined
ugh!!! |
Quote:
BTW, they've taken https://orbit.theplanet.com/ (the support site) off the air. :Graucho |
Quote:
thanks also to Keyzer |
Quote:
The Planet's graphs are public. The adult hosts' graphs aren't. ThePlanet is doing approx 13.5 Gbits aggregate. If you really think NatNet and ISPrime (forgettign Webair and Jupiter) aren't doing >20 gbits combined, you're deluding yourself. I don't know how big Webair and Jupiter is, but if I had to guess, the aggregate total of all 4 (Webair, Jupiter, NatNet, ISPrime) is 30-40Gbits. Also, 13.5/4 = 3.375 Gbits. Whatever you "think" the hosts are doing, if you think that they're smaller than 3.375 gbits you're on crack. For example, NatNet hosts ConsumptionJunction. That alone is probably >3gbits. Further: http://www.isprime.com/index.html Read the top article. ISPrime has recently upgraded their network to have 35gbits of capacity (and you may or may not see a new announcement when their upgrades are complete and bring them to 45gbits of capacity fairly soon), Use your best judgement to figure out why that would be. Using >50% of your network capacity is risking outages, using <25% is wasting money. The answer lies somewhere between those lines. (that being said, you can look at these graphs and see that theplanet is running >50% on many (most?) of their uplinks) http://www.theplanet.com/datacenter.html About halfway down they have "Network Infrastructure" As a fun example: http://www.theplanet.com/image.html?...rovider=Level3 927Mbits at peak on a Gig-E (which in real-world usage maxes out at about 950-960Mbits). On top of all of that, *WHO CARES* who is bigger? Do you really think that it's better to be with a "huge" host that is down, than a small host that is up? Also, ThePlanet's main business is in low end hosting, many of the adult hosts have plans that *start* at >$100/mo. Why be surprised when a low-end host has problems? |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123