SPONSORS THAT USE NATS: Will you pay up ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fünkmaster
    So Fucking Banned
    • Nov 2004
    • 791

    #1

    SPONSORS THAT USE NATS: Will you pay up ??

    Electracash reports that out of 275 rebills 270 are missing, where I come from that's approx 95% shave on rebills. jasonandalex says it's NATS fault, so what will sponsors that use NATS do?

    ... pay up, or stay invisible ??
  • Alex
    So Fucking Banned (YEA!!)
    • Jun 2004
    • 10963

    #2
    Nats is unshavable NOOB go home.


    But in all seriousness. Shaving is when the sponsor purposely doesnt count joins/rebills.

    This was a NAtS issue
    Care about me?
    Who?
    Me!
    Who?

    Comment

    • Relish XXX
      Confirmed User
      • Dec 2004
      • 4904

      #3
      I bet most wont.

      Comment

      • After Shock Media
        It's coming look busy
        • Mar 2001
        • 35299

        #4
        Should this not be sponsors who were using Nats + ACH through electracash?

        [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

        Comment

        • StuartD
          Sofa King Band
          • Jul 2002
          • 29903

          #5
          Not all sponsors that have NATS use the same processors
          This is me on facebook
          This is me on twitter

          Comment

          • triumph
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2002
            • 3433

            #6
            good question.

            Comment

            • GotGauge
              Confirmed User
              • Nov 2001
              • 3072

              #7
              Originally posted by Alex
              Nats is unshavable NOOB go home.


              But in all seriousness. Shaving is when the sponsor purposely doesnt count joins/rebills.

              This was a NAtS issue
              From what I read, it was the Billing company changing the postback codes..


              ICQ 22264474
              [email protected]

              Comment

              • Shooting_Manic
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Jan 2005
                • 1740

                #8
                That sounds about right GotGauge. This all seems to weird.
                Last edited by Shooting_Manic; 03-30-2005, 02:42 PM.
                SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                Comment

                • Veterans Day
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 8403

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Alex
                  Nats is unshavable NOOB go home.
                  Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated

                  Comment

                  • AaronM
                    GFY Royality ;)
                    • Oct 2001
                    • 46923

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Alex
                    Nats is unshavable NOOB go home.


                    HORSE SHIT!

                    And that's all that I have to publicly say about that.....BUT.....You can bet your ass that I just bookmarked this thread so I can point back to it at a later time to remind you of what you just said.

                    Comment

                    • Alex
                      So Fucking Banned (YEA!!)
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 10963

                      #11
                      Originally posted by AaronM
                      HORSE SHIT!

                      And that's all that I have to publicly say about that.....BUT.....You can bet your ass that I just bookmarked this thread so I can point back to it at a later time to remind you of what you just said.


                      Wait you thought i was serious?

                      I thought we all knew if anyone wants to shave they will.
                      Care about me?
                      Who?
                      Me!
                      Who?

                      Comment

                      • JSA Matt
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 5464

                        #12
                        I sensed a little sarcasm in his post, Aaron

                        I could be wrong though... and there are tons of ways to shave with NATS or any software for that matter

                        Comment

                        • andrej_NDC
                          Registered User
                          • May 2004
                          • 7760

                          #13
                          Originally posted by JSA Matt
                          I sensed a little sarcasm in his post, Aaron
                          me too

                          Comment

                          • Makingcoin
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 8919

                            #14
                            We don't use Electracash, but yes we would pay.

                            www.MAKINGCOIN.com

                            icq. 166-662-831
                            "Start making large coin!"


                            Daddy I Get Paid To Be A Whore - Coming Soon

                            Comment

                            • Matt_WildCash
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 1699

                              #15
                              Its the billing company problem and NATS was still working on it when J&A moved off NATS. Most NATS programs don't use electracash either cause there support and database is freaking terrible. One of the main reasons NATS was having issues I bet was cause Electracash has such terrbile support. I can't even email my sales people there or get any reply on tech support issues

                              Try the New XMovies.com and make more $$$ with your Traffic

                              Comment

                              • fris
                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                • Aug 2002
                                • 55700

                                #16
                                i just farted
                                Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

                                Comment

                                • KMR Stitch
                                  I am cool
                                  • Jul 2003
                                  • 14494

                                  #17
                                  See sig And Alex just showed a ratio of 2:2 Shave + 3/^2 -1 + 5 = Shave

                                  Comment

                                  • Platinumpimp
                                    Logos and such.
                                    • Jan 2004
                                    • 10214

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by fris
                                    i just farted
                                    And a few signups popped out?
                                    I design logo's.

                                    Comment

                                    • Tat2Jr
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Feb 2001
                                      • 4882

                                      #19
                                      Never have used Electracash (and won't after reading these threads, since everyone has reported problems with every back end), but of course we'd pay.

                                      I never bought into that whole "non-shavable" crap either. That's like me saying I'm not gonna get laid this year.... Chances are pretty damn good I won't, but I'd never say it couldn't happen.
                                      Last edited by Tat2Jr; 03-30-2005, 03:29 PM.
                                      NICHE MONEY >> Ass WorshipPantiesSolo TeenPantyhose
                                      Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!

                                      Comment

                                      • Methodcash Rick
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jul 2004
                                        • 1720

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by fünkmaster
                                        Electracash reports that out of 275 rebills 270 are missing, where I come from that's approx 95% shave on rebills. jasonandalex says it's NATS fault, so what will sponsors that use NATS do?

                                        ... pay up, or stay invisible ??
                                        If we used ElectraCash for our check processing, you can damn sure bet we'd be stepping up to the plate and doing the right thing by our affiliates, those who wouldn't deserve to be shut down...

                                        Comment

                                        • Kimmykim
                                          bitchslapping zebras!!!!!
                                          • Jun 2001
                                          • 16015

                                          #21
                                          Unless I'm mistaken, the first NATS clients to get an Electracash integration were JSA. When the issue was found, NATS asked JSA to use a different ACH processor while working to resolve the problem with Electracash. New clients coming on board who had Electracash accounts were also asked not to use them as their ACH processor until the situation was suitably resolved.

                                          So I don't think there are more than a couple at best, and it may be that JSA is the only case of this occurrence.

                                          Accusing other sponsors of stealing from their affiliates is a completely ridiculous thing to do.

                                          Attack if you like for my comments, I'm finally off to the airport, about 5 hours later than my flight.

                                          I'll see those of you in Phoenix who are coming, and if you'd like to speak to John or Charlie personally about the issue, let me know. If you don't see them around the show, I'll be happy to set up time for you to talk with them.

                                          Comment

                                          • PokerCams
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Mar 2005
                                            • 251

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by AaronM
                                            HORSE SHIT!

                                            And that's all that I have to publicly say about that.....BUT.....You can bet your ass that I just bookmarked this thread so I can point back to it at a later time to remind you of what you just said.
                                            ya - I was just thinking the same - nothing is totally safe from shaving - no matter how bullet proof they claim to be
                                            SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                                            Comment

                                            • Lensman
                                              GFY Chaperone
                                              • Jan 2001
                                              • 9846

                                              #23
                                              RealityCash does not use Electracash for checks, I'd glad to say.

                                              But I wonder about Aaron's statement, how can you deliberately and secretly shave with Nats? I don't know how, all I can think of is to change the join page to go thru other software, but affiliates can figure than one out in about one minute! I'll be the first one to say that Nats is not perfect, but it's not shavable and the code is not editable (too bad too, but there are some features we've been asking for that I would rather just have our guys add, but we can't).

                                              I think if people say that a certain package can deliberately and secretly shave, they should say how.
                                              Last edited by Lensman; 03-30-2005, 03:46 PM.

                                              Comment

                                              • V_RocKs
                                                Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                                                • Nov 2003
                                                • 32449

                                                #24
                                                The Electracash problem has been FIXED. Most sponsors don't use Electracash that use NATS.. you are trying to make a big issue out of a niche problem...

                                                You are a drama Queen and I do say that makes you a faggot.

                                                Comment

                                                • fünkmaster
                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                  • Nov 2004
                                                  • 791

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Lensman
                                                  RealityCash does not use Electracash for checks, I'd glad to say.

                                                  But I wonder about Aaron's statement, how can you deliberately and secretly shave with Nats? I don't know how, all I can think of is to change the join page to go thru other software, but affiliates can figure than one out in about one minute! I'll be the first one to say that Nats is not perfect, but it's not shavable and the code is not editable (too bad too, but there are some features we've been asking for that I would rather just have our guys add, but we can't).

                                                  I think if people say that a certain package can deliberately and secretly shave, they should say how.
                                                  ... you just drop the reseller ID or override it with you house ID before passing that data on to NATS, talk to my good old buddy greg lasrado and his american , ex IBILL, friend bob cox, they know all the dirty tricks.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • AaronM
                                                    GFY Royality ;)
                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                    • 46923

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by Lensman
                                                    RealityCash does not use Electracash for checks, I'd glad to say.

                                                    But I wonder about Aaron's statement, how can you deliberately and secretly shave with Nats? I don't know how, ......

                                                    I wonder how much money information like this might be worth privately?

                                                    Nah....Not my style.


                                                    Besides.....I was probably just talking out my ass again as usual. Pay no attention.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • DirtyDanza
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Aug 2002
                                                      • 8375

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Lensman
                                                      RealityCash does not use Electracash for checks, I'd glad to say.

                                                      But I wonder about Aaron's statement, how can you deliberately and secretly shave with Nats? I don't know how, all I can think of is to change the join page to go thru other software, but affiliates can figure than one out in about one minute! I'll be the first one to say that Nats is not perfect, but it's not shavable and the code is not editable (too bad too, but there are some features we've been asking for that I would rather just have our guys add, but we can't).

                                                      I think if people say that a certain package can deliberately and secretly shave, they should say how.
                                                      I agree we have some things we want to add as well but it makes it really hard when the code is tottally hidden... but none the less were really happy with nats
                                                      Danza Bucks is back!!!

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Lensman
                                                        GFY Chaperone
                                                        • Jan 2001
                                                        • 9846

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by fünkmaster
                                                        ... you just drop the reseller ID or override it with you house ID before passing that data on to NATS, talk to my good old buddy greg lasrado and his american , ex IBILL, friend bob cox, they know all the dirty tricks.
                                                        Affliates can see that. View source on the join page: <input type="hidden" name="nats" value="MTE3OjU6NQ">. Besides, an affiliate can simply pull out his own credit card and see if he gets credit for the join. Check joins may be delayed because of normal time-based fraud delays, but credit cards never are. So there are two ways affiliates can detect that in one minute.
                                                        Last edited by Lensman; 03-30-2005, 04:05 PM.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • AaronM
                                                          GFY Royality ;)
                                                          • Oct 2001
                                                          • 46923

                                                          #29
                                                          Nevermind

                                                          Comment

                                                          • fünkmaster
                                                            So Fucking Banned
                                                            • Nov 2004
                                                            • 791

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Lensman
                                                            Affliates can see that. View source on the join page: <input type="hidden" name="nats" value="MTE3OjU6NQ">
                                                            ... agreed, but then again that's what sponsors would call "a glitch".

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Methodcash Rick
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Jul 2004
                                                              • 1720

                                                              #31
                                                              There's a much easier way than described above..

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Lensman
                                                                GFY Chaperone
                                                                • Jan 2001
                                                                • 9846

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by fünkmaster
                                                                ... agreed, but then again that's what sponsors would call "a glitch".
                                                                OK, so we agree there is no way to secretly and deliberatly shave Nats.

                                                                What are they paying Kimmy? I want the same!

                                                                Comment

                                                                • JSA Matt
                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                  • Aug 2003
                                                                  • 5464

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by Lensman
                                                                  Affliates can see that. View source on the join page: <input type="hidden" name="nats" value="MTE3OjU6NQ">. Besides, an affiliate can simply pull out his own credit card and see if he gets credit for the join. Check joins may be delayed because of normal time-based fraud delays, but credit cards never are. So there are two ways affiliates can detect that in one minute.
                                                                  Simply changing the first letter in a NATS code to lowercase will result in a sale to the default NATS account

                                                                  Example: MTE3OjU6NQ to mTE3OjU6NQ (Or another example: MTE3OjU6NQ to MtE3OjU6NQ)

                                                                  Of course it's not fool proof, but it's one of many possibilities
                                                                  Last edited by JSA Matt; 03-30-2005, 04:12 PM.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • AaronM
                                                                    GFY Royality ;)
                                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                                    • 46923

                                                                    #34
                                                                    So I'm sitting here in Raven's living room....She is sitting in front of me telling me.....in not so many words.....To STFU.

                                                                    So, that's exactly what I am gonna do.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • AaronM
                                                                      GFY Royality ;)
                                                                      • Oct 2001
                                                                      • 46923

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by JSA Matt
                                                                      Simply changing the first letter in a NATS code to lowercase will result in a sale to the default NATS account

                                                                      Example: MTE3OjU6NQ to mTE3OjU6NQ (Or another example: MTE3OjU6NQ to MtE3OjU6NQ)

                                                                      Of course it's not fool proof, but it's one of many possibilities


                                                                      Gee....Who knew?

                                                                      Matt, let it go.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Lensman
                                                                        GFY Chaperone
                                                                        • Jan 2001
                                                                        • 9846

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by JSA Matt
                                                                        Simply changing the first letter in a NATS code to lowercase will result in a sale to the default NATS account

                                                                        Example: MTE3OjU6NQ to mTE3OjU6NQ (Or another example: MTE3OjU6NQ to MtE3OjU6NQ)

                                                                        Of course it's not fool proof, but it's one of many possibilities
                                                                        Same thing

                                                                        Originally posted by Lensman
                                                                        Affliates can see that. View source on the join page: <input type="hidden" name="nats" value="MTE3OjU6NQ">. Besides, an affiliate can simply pull out his own credit card and see if he gets credit for the join. Check joins may be delayed because of normal time-based fraud delays, but credit cards never are. So there are two ways affiliates can detect that in one minute.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • PokerCams
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Mar 2005
                                                                          • 251

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by Lensman
                                                                          Affliates can see that. View source on the join page: <input type="hidden" name="nats" value="MTE3OjU6NQ">. Besides, an affiliate can simply pull out his own credit card and see if he gets credit for the join. Check joins may be delayed because of normal time-based fraud delays, but credit cards never are. So there are two ways affiliates can detect that in one minute.
                                                                          yes - they can pull out their own cc and test it - but probably only 5% actually would do that
                                                                          SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • JSA Matt
                                                                            So Fucking Banned
                                                                            • Aug 2003
                                                                            • 5464

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by AaronM
                                                                            Gee....Who knew?

                                                                            Matt, let it go.
                                                                            Well I see a lot of truth in Lensman's post...

                                                                            "I think if people say that a certain package can deliberately and secretly shave, they should say how."

                                                                            It should be public knowledge and affiliates should be watching for stuff like this..

                                                                            I will not give any more example on the board though

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • PokerCams
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Mar 2005
                                                                              • 251

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by BB-Rick
                                                                              There's a much easier way than described above..
                                                                              and that is?
                                                                              SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • TurboAngel
                                                                                H.B.I.C.
                                                                                • Jun 2003
                                                                                • 30122

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by AaronM
                                                                                So I'm sitting here in Raven's living room....She is sitting in front of me telling me.....in not so many words.....To STFU.

                                                                                So, that's exactly what I am gonna do.
                                                                                I wish I was there!

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                  ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                                  • Jun 2004
                                                                                  • 28609

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by Lensman
                                                                                  I think if people say that a certain package can deliberately and secretly shave, they should say how.
                                                                                  Well i can tell you several ways , but NATS doesnt really have much to do with them.

                                                                                  Lets take the recent example of the realitycash FHG's that were being redirected to 10dollarcash sites.

                                                                                  Totally honest mistake , and i find no fault in realitycash in any way , but using the same method one could simply forward those 404's back to the originating program.

                                                                                  For example. lets say the galleries are for realitycash MILF site, and im sending traffic to the FHG's from my tgp.

                                                                                  So you have the FHG's on several servers to help balance the loads. All you have to do is remove that gallery from one of the servers for a certain amount of time each day, or if you were clever you would simply do what tgp cheaters do and track the ip of each affiliate and then make sure they never see the 404. Or rotate out the galleries.

                                                                                  The only way to find out would be to check 1000 fhg's source code for your NATS code ( that changes for each program ) every day.
                                                                                  hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • LeeNoga
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Jul 2001
                                                                                    • 3043

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by Platinumpimp
                                                                                    And a few signups popped out?
                                                                                    Yes, with lingering rebills!

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Methodcash Rick
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Jul 2004
                                                                                      • 1720

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      OK, say you run 3 different processors,

                                                                                      There is a cron job that runs nightly for each of those processors which polls the processors, and pulls in renewals, cancellations, CB, & credits..

                                                                                      Since ( for most ) NATS does not control the addition and deletion of the username and password, there would be no "real" need to run the cron job for say 1 of the 3 processors..

                                                                                      So if you don't run 1 of the three cronjobs that pulls rebills from the processors, you just shaved all the rebills from that procesor, and the affiliate would never know, as NATS doesn't show them WHO rebilled, and WHICH processor the rebills came from...

                                                                                      Now granted, NATS could probably easily catch a program that is doing something like this, and it's quite possible that they have something in the code to monitor that to keep it from happening...

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • xlogger
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Jul 2004
                                                                                        • 9507

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        I dont think NATS will like this thread very much.

                                                                                        ----------
                                                                                        XLOGGER [REFLECTED] [OH]

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Lensman
                                                                                          GFY Chaperone
                                                                                          • Jan 2001
                                                                                          • 9846

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                          Well i can tell you several ways , but NATS doesnt really have much to do with them.

                                                                                          Lets take the recent example of the realitycash FHG's that were being redirected to 10dollarcash sites.

                                                                                          Totally honest mistake , and i find no fault in realitycash in any way , but using the same method one could simply forward those 404's back to the originating program.

                                                                                          For example. lets say the galleries are for realitycash MILF site, and im sending traffic to the FHG's from my tgp.

                                                                                          So you have the FHG's on several servers to help balance the loads. All you have to do is remove that gallery from one of the servers for a certain amount of time each day, or if you were clever you would simply do what tgp cheaters do and track the ip of each affiliate and then make sure they never see the 404. Or rotate out the galleries.

                                                                                          The only way to find out would be to check 1000 fhg's source code for your NATS code ( that changes for each program ) every day.
                                                                                          That has nothing to do with Nats, that is a hosted gallery problem, and is detectable by affiliates.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                            ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                                            • Jun 2004
                                                                                            • 28609

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            In conclusion.

                                                                                            Is NATS shaveable? NO.

                                                                                            Can you use NATS and still shave? YES

                                                                                            Is there really much difference ? Not really.

                                                                                            Should people go with nats because they think it means they cant be shaved ? Not in my opinion.

                                                                                            Is NATS a great piece of software ? From everything i have heard it is, other than some minor glitches.
                                                                                            hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Lensman
                                                                                              GFY Chaperone
                                                                                              • Jan 2001
                                                                                              • 9846

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by BB-Rick
                                                                                              OK, say you run 3 different processors,

                                                                                              There is a cron job that runs nightly for each of those processors which polls the processors, and pulls in renewals, cancellations, CB, & credits..

                                                                                              Since ( for most ) NATS does not control the addition and deletion of the username and password, there would be no "real" need to run the cron job for say 1 of the 3 processors..

                                                                                              So if you don't run 1 of the three cronjobs that pulls rebills from the processors, you just shaved all the rebills from that procesor, and the affiliate would never know, as NATS doesn't show them WHO rebilled, and WHICH processor the rebills came from...

                                                                                              Now granted, NATS could probably easily catch a program that is doing something like this, and it's quite possible that they have something in the code to monitor that to keep it from happening...
                                                                                              I think Nats would catch that, and even if it didn't, it would only effect reshare programs, it would not allow a per-signup program like RealityCash to shave.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                                ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                                                • Jun 2004
                                                                                                • 28609

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by Lensman
                                                                                                That has nothing to do with Nats, that is a hosted gallery problem, and is detectable by affiliates.

                                                                                                Yes i agree it doesnt really have anything to do with NATS , other than the fact that it could be used with NATS. So the fact a sponsor uses NATS doesnt mean they dont shave , thats all i was trying to say.. Because NATS was sort of promoted in that manner i think its only fair to say..

                                                                                                And in my example above , it wont be detected by affiliates unless they check each page thousands of times a day .. ( thats not feasable )
                                                                                                hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • shermo

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Duke Dollars does not use Electracash. If we owed, it would be paid for sure. We paid out on IBill, so this would be no different.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • AaronM
                                                                                                    GFY Royality ;)
                                                                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                                                                    • 46923

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    See Sig!

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...