NATS v MPA my 2 Cents - GoFuckYourself.com

mensniche · 03-29-2005, 01:51 PM

Ok guys here are my

I have been around for about 3 years and in this time I have seen allot of things come and go, good companies fight back for there reputation and be better for it in the long run and some people/companies fall over at the first problem.

Below Is what I have seen in the cascading/backend billing/fulfillment software.

MPA
----

Oystein and Gary - Both very good professional people who have great business minds have got a very good foothold in the market, there company has had some bad press in the past but have come back from this and are now a VERY solid solution, never talk down or slander any other company. There solution is very solid and this is why we have stuck with them and are very happy with them over the last 2 years.

NATS
-----

Very unprofessional, met them at internet for the first time, did not want to sell us there solution and seem to be very unprofessional on the message boards, there software is very untested and new and therefore people I have spoke to believe they will run into problems which MPA have already been through... only time will tell if this company is as strong as MPA and will come through the "teething stage"

My conclusion is go with the longer standing more professional set-up, this is only what I have seen and this is all I can comment on, maybe we meet NATS on a bad day or maybe others have had a better response, either way I strongly recommend MPA for the long term solution and I will offer my past comments and suggestions to anyone.

MensNiche is here to help everyone and make some $$ on the way!

Good luck with any decisions you guys make and hopefully you remember my comments if it works out...

have a great day!

Jon2 · 03-29-2005, 01:55 PM

Well we at made in porn use NATS and we were one of the first customers...We are very happy with the software and will continue to use and support NATS...

To each his own...

Jon

xlogger · 03-29-2005, 01:56 PM

Good Read.

who · 03-29-2005, 01:56 PM

I agree.. to each his pwn. It's a bit like black or white chocolate. :D:D:D:D

Rich · 03-29-2005, 01:59 PM

Why anyone would invest in a series of sites and then go with pre packaged affiliate software is beyond me. Hire a good program and create your own.

People only make themselves look stupid and new when they say things like "we use NATS, we CAN'T shave".

Kimmykim · 03-29-2005, 02:01 PM

At the end of the day, anyone can shave if they try hard enough... doesn't matter who is handling the tracking or cutting the checks.

MPA, NATS and Executive Stats are all very good programs. Each has a different target market for the most part, and competition is one of the best things around. It makes each company work harder to get and keep clients and to give them the best possible product to use.

sandman! · 03-29-2005, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

Why anyone would invest in a series of sites and then go with pre packaged affiliate software is beyond me. Hire a good program and create your own.

People only make themselves look stupid and new when they say things like "we use NATS, we CAN'T shave".

There are alot of clueless webmasters who are like wow they use nats they cant shave i need to send traffic there.

Nader · 03-29-2005, 02:03 PM

I think this is getting way out of hand

modF · 03-29-2005, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

Why anyone would invest in a series of sites and then go with pre packaged affiliate software is beyond me. Hire a good program and create your own.

I'll give you one very good reason, time. I could write my own software, but I don't have the time or the desire to do so.

chupachups · 03-29-2005, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

Why anyone would invest in a series of sites and then go with pre packaged affiliate software is beyond me. Hire a good program and create your own.

Amen to that!

pornguy · 03-29-2005, 02:04 PM

And those clueless webmasters will loose in the end.

mensniche · 03-29-2005, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon

Well we at made in porn use NATS and we were one of the first customers...We are very happy with the software and will continue to use and support NATS...

To each his own...

Jon

Thanks for your comments... again this is just my point of view... and others may have found others

Thomas1007 · 03-30-2005, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

Why anyone would invest in a series of sites and then go with pre packaged affiliate software is beyond me. Hire a good program and create your own.

03-29-2005, 01:51 PM	#1
mensniche Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: UK Posts: 455	NATS v MPA my 2 Cents Ok guys here are my I have been around for about 3 years and in this time I have seen allot of things come and go, good companies fight back for there reputation and be better for it in the long run and some people/companies fall over at the first problem. Below Is what I have seen in the cascading/backend billing/fulfillment software. MPA ---- Oystein and Gary - Both very good professional people who have great business minds have got a very good foothold in the market, there company has had some bad press in the past but have come back from this and are now a VERY solid solution, never talk down or slander any other company. There solution is very solid and this is why we have stuck with them and are very happy with them over the last 2 years. NATS ----- Very unprofessional, met them at internet for the first time, did not want to sell us there solution and seem to be very unprofessional on the message boards, there software is very untested and new and therefore people I have spoke to believe they will run into problems which MPA have already been through... only time will tell if this company is as strong as MPA and will come through the "teething stage" My conclusion is go with the longer standing more professional set-up, this is only what I have seen and this is all I can comment on, maybe we meet NATS on a bad day or maybe others have had a better response, either way I strongly recommend MPA for the long term solution and I will offer my past comments and suggestions to anyone. MensNiche is here to help everyone and make some $$ on the way! Good luck with any decisions you guys make and hopefully you remember my comments if it works out... have a great day! __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.

03-29-2005, 01:56 PM	#3
xlogger Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: NY Posts: 9,507	Good Read. __________________ ---------- XLOGGER [REFLECTED] [OH]

03-29-2005, 02:04 PM	#11
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	And those clueless webmasters will loose in the end. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-29-2005, 01:55 PM	#2
Jon2 So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 2,875	Well we at made in porn use NATS and we were one of the first customers...We are very happy with the software and will continue to use and support NATS... To each his own... Jon

03-29-2005, 01:56 PM	#4
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	I agree.. to each his pwn. It's a bit like black or white chocolate. :D:D:D:D

03-29-2005, 01:59 PM	#5
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	Why anyone would invest in a series of sites and then go with pre packaged affiliate software is beyond me. Hire a good program and create your own. People only make themselves look stupid and new when they say things like "we use NATS, we CAN'T shave".

03-29-2005, 02:01 PM	#6
Kimmykim bitchslapping zebras!!!!! Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: In a shack by the beach Posts: 16,015	At the end of the day, anyone can shave if they try hard enough... doesn't matter who is handling the tracking or cutting the checks. MPA, NATS and Executive Stats are all very good programs. Each has a different target market for the most part, and competition is one of the best things around. It makes each company work harder to get and keep clients and to give them the best possible product to use.

03-29-2005, 02:03 PM	#8
Nader Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 5,086	I think this is getting way out of hand