What fuckin' evidence did they plant? Name it. I am very well read on this subject. What evidence exactly are you referring to? Who did it, what was the timeline when they had the chance to do so, and what evidence?

Well the bloody glove may have been real, but the way it was found sure wasn't. The socks that were "found" in OJ's upstairts bedroom? Funny how he killed the bitch with so much blood spuritng everywhere and only a couple of small drops got on the BOTTOM of his socks. Also the fact he took his shoes of before he got inot the house yet this blood on the BOTTOM of his socks left NONE on the bottom floor or the stairs or the hallyway to the bedroom or the bedroom itself all which had WHITE CARPETING on it. Hmmmm. Amazing.

He is not any worse than any other successful defense attorney.

I believe unsuccessful defense attorneys either go out of business or go to work for the DA's office.

oh man.. Nancy Grace who was on Larry King is pathetic.. lol .. What a bad actress...

So you are basically towing Cochrane's line. You are saying Fuhrman planted the glove after he found it at the murder scene I take it. Let me ask you. How soon do you think or know Fuhrman arrived at the murder scene when he 'collected this evidence and moved it to the Rockingham location' according to you?

How am I supposed to know. I wasn't part of a racist conpsiracy. Oh are you saying Fuhrman wasn't racist? Anyways noticved you did have an answer to the bloody socks that mysteriously left no blood or dna ANYWHERE but the socks themselves. Thomas Jefferson said it was better to let 100 guilty men go free than to have ONE innocent man convicted. The minute we accept the DA and cops making shit up to to "win" we are fucked. Anyways I though this was about JUSTICE not WINS?

about the socks, the blood spatter patterns on his socks are consistent with other crime scenes of similar natures, as he was wearing Bruno Magli shoes.....oh btw, they did have his FOOTPRINTS in blood of HIS shoes at the crime scene........he later denied ever owning a pair of bruno magli's, until photographs of him wearing them were discovered.

expert after expert has gone on to say that there is NO problem with the blood on the socks.

Now as to my point...........Fuhrman arrived on the crime scene only after more than 50 cops had been logged in as being there and turning up and finding evidence. He wasn't even there long before he was one of the cops that went over to Rockingham, OJ's house. So you are telling me we have a cop LATE on the scene, who has no clue what the other cops have found already and what that evidence may entail (who it may implicate etc), and yet, this cop, being at the original scene hardly at all, finds this bloody glove, hides out WITHOUT ANYONE ELSE NOTICING IT, including the cops that went with him to Rockingham, and decides to frame OJ not even knowing that perhaps all the other evidence collected at Nicole's residence may point directly to someone else, and that he may spend the rest of his life in jail as he would clearly be found it that he was trying to plant evidence to implicate an innocent man? Gimme a break. And thats just for starters, Gator. That is only the beginning of how the frame up conspiracy stories fall apart.

Well he WASN'T wear the bloody shoes in his house so that must mean he TOOK THEM OFF. So now he's wearing socks with BLOOD on the BOTTOM of them. He walk accross WHITE carpet and UP THE STAIRS and DOWN THE HALLWAY and INTO THE BEDROOM and NO blood AT ALL is found ANYWHERE but on the socks. Yeah ok.

Agreed. Cochran was a snake oil salesman, a charlatan, a fool. In steering the OJ trial towards issues of racism, he may have violated attorney ethics.

RIP Johnny

amen.

he was a king of sleeze. here's to him rotting.

Geez you people act like racism doesn't exist, man did his job and if you disagree with his ethics it's quite in poor taste to call him names on the day of his death......learn some respect......

Did I miss something?