Why JasonandAlex.com is leaving NATS.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Strife
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2001
    • 4534

    #51
    Wow..now I'm starting to wonder if that's the same reason why rebills have been shitty with some of my sponsors using NATS.
    Buy & Sell Ads on The Most Sexy Advertising Network on the Planet

    Comment

    • Nader
      Confirmed User
      • Dec 2003
      • 5086

      #52
      Where all your data dumps added properly?

      Comment

      • undermyspell
        Confirmed User
        • Sep 2002
        • 875

        #53
        Originally posted by Keyser Soze
        Some people always see the glass as half empty look at the bright side it counted 2% of the signups correctly.
        I knew I was missing the silver lining

        Comment

        • Drake
          Hello world!
          • Mar 2003
          • 12508

          #54
          Hope both parties can resolve this

          Comment

          • ssp
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2005
            • 7990

            #55
            Originally posted by Keyser Soze
            Some people always see the glass as half empty look at the bright side it counted 2% of the signups correctly.

            Comment

            • shuki
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2004
              • 3070

              #56
              So does either team have an idea of what is causing the problem?

              Correct me if I am wrong but it doesn't sound like J&A are saying that Nats is doing this intentionally. It looks like they wanted this corrected and have been having a hard time getting what they want done.

              Time will tell.
              Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

              Comment

              • iBanker
                Confirmed User
                • Dec 2004
                • 2758

                #57
                Originally posted by NichePay_Nader
                Where all your data dumps added properly?
                This major problem was presented to them. Never fixed, although they claimed full intergration with EC.
                www.JasonandAlex.com
                Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

                Comment

                • bigdog
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2001
                  • 6964

                  #58
                  Nats was the best on market at a certain time. but executivestats looks pretty good considering you can get the full source and add what you want when needed.

                  Comment

                  • axelcat
                    Adult Locals
                    • Jun 2002
                    • 25450

                    #59
                    Lots of people here getting sig spots

                    Comment

                    • shuki
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 3070

                      #60
                      Originally posted by iBanker
                      This major problem was presented to them. Never fixed, although they claimed full intergration with EC.
                      This is what I thought.....did they ignore the request or just have problems getting it done?
                      Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                      Comment

                      • Yo Adrian
                        Confirmed User
                        • Apr 2002
                        • 6326

                        #61
                        Originally posted by Keyser Soze
                        Some people always see the glass as half empty look at the bright side it counted 2% of the signups correctly.


                        Dude that's just wrong
                        Adult SEO Partners - Full service Adult SEO Agency serving some of the biggest names in the industry.

                        Comment

                        • AaronM
                          GFY Royality ;)
                          • Oct 2001
                          • 46923

                          #62
                          Originally posted by EvilFubAr
                          Id stick with a program that is trusted and already knows how to pay their webmasters... having problems paying your webmasters whatever the excuse (NATS) may be is pathetic.

                          Pathetic is whee somebody interjects their 2 cents without paying attention to all the facts which have been posted.

                          Comment

                          • SmokeyTheBear
                            ►SouthOfHeaven
                            • Jun 2004
                            • 28609

                            #63
                            Originally posted by shuki
                            So does either team have an idea of what is causing the problem?

                            Correct me if I am wrong but it doesn't sound like J&A are saying that Nats is doing this intentionally. It looks like they wanted this corrected and have been having a hard time getting what they want done.

                            Time will tell.

                            Your not wrong.

                            But you cant let affiliates use software you know is stealing their money. Not only is it unethical but as he already pointed out , it creates TWICE the work having to hand verify each affiliates rebills.
                            hatisblack at yahoo.com

                            Comment

                            • undermyspell
                              Confirmed User
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 875

                              #64
                              Originally posted by EvilFubAr
                              Well, if you cant come up with your own stats program this is what you get.

                              It amazes me to see affiliates using a sponsor program that cant manage their own system internally with their own software.
                              why spend thousands of dollars creating your own program when there is supposed to be a superior product on the market already? That's like building your own car from the ground up when you can go buy a Lamborghini.

                              Comment

                              • iBanker
                                Confirmed User
                                • Dec 2004
                                • 2758

                                #65
                                Originally posted by shuki
                                This is what I thought.....did they ignore the request or just have problems getting it done?
                                Legally speaking, I can only speak fact, and that I cannot answer without talking to our attorney.
                                www.JasonandAlex.com
                                Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

                                Comment

                                • kmanrox
                                  aka K-Man
                                  • Oct 2001
                                  • 29295

                                  #66
                                  If you think that any program is shaveproof, you have absolutely no grasp of how programming works. NATS doesn't even have to have control over it, you can implement a shaving feature on your server before nats even gets involved I'm told.
                                  Crypto HODLr
                                  Crypto mining
                                  Angel investor

                                  Comment

                                  • Trax
                                    [----------------------]
                                    • Aug 2001
                                    • 14486

                                    #67
                                    John is a nice guy and so far I've only heard good things about NATS
                                    The only feature I would add for sure is a FORCE to show first page uniques and raws with all programs, including realitycash.
                                    Just being shown 2nd page uniques doesn't give it for me. That's the only critic i can give to the nats crew... and this is a positive meant one :D

                                    Comment

                                    • shuki
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Aug 2004
                                      • 3070

                                      #68
                                      Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                      Your not wrong.

                                      But you cant let affiliates use software you know is stealing their money. Not only is it unethical but as he already pointed out , it creates TWICE the work having to hand verify each affiliates rebills.
                                      I agree.

                                      I am looking for a solution for the exact point you make...to automate and take away hand work.

                                      It looks like they were finally made aware of the problem and looked for it to be fixed. That is what I don't understand. Why won't nats fix the problem if it hurts affils?
                                      Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                                      Comment

                                      • SmokeyTheBear
                                        ►SouthOfHeaven
                                        • Jun 2004
                                        • 28609

                                        #69
                                        Originally posted by Hedonistic
                                        If you think that any program is shaveproof, you have absolutely no grasp of how programming works. NATS doesn't even have to have control over it, you can implement a shaving feature on your server before nats even gets involved I'm told.

                                        yes this is true. Without being on the sponsors servers theres no way to tell.

                                        RealityCash for example was "missing" data on one of its servers for FHG's , as a result when surfers clicked the fhg's they were sent to adult.com's 10dollarcash program and the hits werent tracked at all with NATS. Zero ZIp NADA . you never made a cent nor a click. Isolated small example , but this could be done on purpose in a rotational method so as not to be caught, and nobody would ever know.
                                        hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                        Comment

                                        • whatif_3
                                          Registered User
                                          • Jul 2004
                                          • 459

                                          #70
                                          amazing that this all could have been avoided if NATS had used a little tact in the previous JSA thread and avoided trying to save face by suggesting that NATS kicked JSA out...you put your big balls on the table, your going to risk them gettting cut off

                                          Comment

                                          • SmokeyTheBear
                                            ►SouthOfHeaven
                                            • Jun 2004
                                            • 28609

                                            #71
                                            Originally posted by Trax
                                            John is a nice guy and so far I've only heard good things about NATS
                                            The only feature I would add for sure is a FORCE to show first page uniques and raws with all programs, including realitycash.
                                            Just being shown 2nd page uniques doesn't give it for me. That's the only critic i can give to the nats crew... and this is a positive meant one :D
                                            im pretty sure OCCASH is using NATS and showing RAW first page hits. Or at least UNIQUE first page hits.

                                            Infact when realitycash first started they were showing First page hits , then they changed it.
                                            hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                            Comment

                                            • shuki
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Aug 2004
                                              • 3070

                                              #72
                                              Originally posted by Trax
                                              John is a nice guy and so far I've only heard good things about NATS
                                              The only feature I would add for sure is a FORCE to show first page uniques and raws with all programs, including realitycash.
                                              Just being shown 2nd page uniques doesn't give it for me. That's the only critic i can give to the nats crew... and this is a positive meant one :D
                                              Are you able to custom add features like this as a Nats client? Will they code this at your expense? Sounds like a small faeture that would help and I want to make my future affils happy.
                                              Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                                              Comment

                                              • SKULL
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Jun 2003
                                                • 1953

                                                #73
                                                This aways sucks... for us the the sponsored ones
                                                www.traffic-trades.com

                                                Comment

                                                • shuki
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Aug 2004
                                                  • 3070

                                                  #74
                                                  Originally posted by iBanker
                                                  Legally speaking, I can only speak fact, and that I cannot answer without talking to our attorney.
                                                  I understand
                                                  Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Kimmykim
                                                    bitchslapping zebras!!!!!
                                                    • Jun 2001
                                                    • 16015

                                                    #75
                                                    As always, there are many sides to every story.

                                                    It's nice to see Chris laying out his side here, and I certainly hope he has given considerable thought to his posts before posting, and is absolutely positive that his information is correct.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Michael O
                                                      More Cowbell
                                                      • Jul 2001
                                                      • 10607

                                                      #76
                                                      Any program can shave if they want to just like smokey said there are tons of ways to do it.
                                                      Truth Teller

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Alex From San Diego
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • May 2001
                                                        • 1642

                                                        #77
                                                        We are not accusing NATS of intentionally shaving so lets get that clear.
                                                        We are simply stating back to original statement that tracking issues were an issue for us among a few other things. There was not a fix for this so we had to switch to another check processor. I have nothing bad either to say about the other check processor, we just wanted to use EC as our primary for check processing.

                                                        If a company says they support a specific biller then they should honor that and not just have it up on their site and when you are live find out they really don't. It sucks to have to make a business decision based on software restrictions.
                                                        We are what we repeatedly do.-Aristotle

                                                        Comment

                                                        • shuki
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Aug 2004
                                                          • 3070

                                                          #78
                                                          Again from my point of view it sounds like neither firm was or is interested in hurting affiliates. What it looks like is that there is a glitch in the software that needs to be worked out. The question is why is it happening?
                                                          Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                                                          Comment

                                                          • iBanker
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Dec 2004
                                                            • 2758

                                                            #79
                                                            Originally posted by Kimmykim
                                                            As always, there are many sides to every story.

                                                            It's nice to see Chris laying out his side here, and I certainly hope he has given considerable thought to his posts before posting, and is absolutely positive that his information is correct.
                                                            It is perfect. Prove me wrong. You can't.
                                                            www.JasonandAlex.com
                                                            Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

                                                            Comment

                                                            • SmokeyTheBear
                                                              ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                              • Jun 2004
                                                              • 28609

                                                              #80
                                                              SPACASH has a quite nice setup for stats, very detailed..

                                                              Broken down country by country , by raw first page , second page , join page etc evrything you need.
                                                              hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                              Comment

                                                              • devilspost
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Feb 2004
                                                                • 3980

                                                                #81
                                                                Looks like there is money to be made in porn, just not as a affiliate code monkey.

                                                                Brothels and Escorts Worldwide.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • shuki
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Aug 2004
                                                                  • 3070

                                                                  #82
                                                                  Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                                  SPACASH has a quite nice setup for stats, very detailed..

                                                                  Broken down country by country , by raw first page , second page , join page etc evrything you need.
                                                                  Is this a custom solution?
                                                                  Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Yo Adrian
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Apr 2002
                                                                    • 6326

                                                                    #83
                                                                    Originally posted by Kimmykim
                                                                    As always, there are many sides to every story.

                                                                    It's nice to see Chris laying out his side here, and I certainly hope he has given considerable thought to his posts before posting, and is absolutely positive that his information is correct.
                                                                    I seriously doubt Chris / J&A would just impulsively post this information. There is a reason for it, these guys are solid.
                                                                    Adult SEO Partners - Full service Adult SEO Agency serving some of the biggest names in the industry.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • baddog
                                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                                      • Apr 2001
                                                                      • 107089

                                                                      #84
                                                                      Well, to be honest I have just recently started promoting programs that use NATS, and I love the system (especially the campaign tracking), but I never understood how it could be "shave proof"

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • shuki
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Aug 2004
                                                                        • 3070

                                                                        #85
                                                                        Well I am going out to the pool to do some work.

                                                                        I will be back to check on the threads progress. Some very informative stuff in here.
                                                                        Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Shap
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • May 2001
                                                                          • 8313

                                                                          #86
                                                                          I may be wrong but Nats has been around roughly the same amount of time that MPA2 was when problems starting going public with them. Right? I'm no expert but that makes perfect sense. MPA2 was the ultimate program. Everybody loved it. Then after 6 to 10 months bugs start happening and everybody goes fuckin nuts. Now nats has been around for about that time and I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more and more Nats problems pop up.


                                                                          Here are a few of the problems.
                                                                          #1 if you want to shave you are going to shave. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a complete noob. If a program wants to shave they'll dish out the bucks and make damn sure they are shaving. You can blame MPA2 all you want for including that feature. Yes I agree it was wrong to make it SO easy to shave. But think about this, if they included it is because there was a DEMAND for it. They made a bad business decision to include it however webmasters are making an even worse business decision by DEMANDING and USING shave functions.

                                                                          #2 The more features an affiliate software program has the more problems you are looking at. I'm a stats freak. In an ideal world I'd be able to get every stat I could possibly imagine. Unfortunately that doesn't work well in our industry. Sure it's nice to know all your stats and log and track every single thing. However that puts a huge load on your server and greatly increases your chances for disaster. The majority of issues that have come up with other affiliate software programs have been server issues, database issues, mysql issues, corrupt data issues. All the issues seemed to have one thing in common the program was trying to do too much. That is why we decided to use a program that basically tracks only what i need. Hits and Sales and I keep my password management 100% seperate from our affiliate program.

                                                                          #3 If a program like Nats and Mpa2 is popular and sells well then the company gets bogged down on orders and can't dedicate enough time to you and your problems. I spoke with Oystein about this. They didn't expect the growth they had and as a result they quickly wound up understaffed. That is a tough position to be in. That is why it isn't always best to go with the most popular affiliate software. It's important to go with a company that:
                                                                          - provides a solid software that will do the job.
                                                                          - has the man power to do custom work for you and take care of your custom needs in a timely manner.
                                                                          - has the man power to take care of all your problems in a timely manner.

                                                                          You have to remember these programs are built to be sold to the masses. Personally I always have custom requests for my programs. Any company that can't respond to that won't get my business.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                            ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                            • Jun 2004
                                                                            • 28609

                                                                            #87
                                                                            Originally posted by Alex From San Diego
                                                                            We are not accusing NATS of intentionally shaving so lets get that clear.
                                                                            We are simply stating back to original statement that tracking issues were an issue for us among a few other things. There was not a fix for this so we had to switch to another check processor. I have nothing bad either to say about the other check processor, we just wanted to use EC as our primary for check processing.

                                                                            If a company says they support a specific biller then they should honor that and not just have it up on their site and when you are live find out they really don't. It sucks to have to make a business decision based on software restrictions.

                                                                            I dont think anyone is insinuating NATS is doing anything intentionally or that they would help anyone do anything like this.

                                                                            The problem is if your affiliates arent getting paid , they will move on to more lucrative sponsors.

                                                                            Unless a sponsor is on the ball they arent going to notice , because glitches like this mean the sponsor gets MORE money and the affiliates LESS, so everything appears better until your affiliate base starts leaving for better ratio's.

                                                                            If the problem isn't addressed what else can you do really but switch software.
                                                                            hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • flashfreak
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Jun 2002
                                                                              • 4396

                                                                              #88
                                                                              interresting..
                                                                              SEO Mogul | ICQ: 163671223

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Major (Tom)
                                                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                                                • Nov 2003
                                                                                • 32492

                                                                                #89
                                                                                I had a similar problem too, but it was with wts bank. Actually nats wasnt reporting that they were cancelled or bounced checks so I paid out on about 270 checks. This seems like something as simple as a post back error. Shaving? no.. Its just a miscomunication of the back ends. That can actually be retro imported pretty easially. im almost certain of that. In all honesty, this is something that you should have caught sooner and mentioned it to nathan. I caught my postback problem within a few days and it was fixed in a few minutes.
                                                                                Duke

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                  ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                                  • Jun 2004
                                                                                  • 28609

                                                                                  #90
                                                                                  Originally posted by shap
                                                                                  I may be wrong but Nats has been around roughly the same amount of time that MPA2 was when problems starting going public with them. Right? I'm no expert but that makes perfect sense. MPA2 was the ultimate program. Everybody loved it. Then after 6 to 10 months bugs start happening and everybody goes fuckin nuts. Now nats has been around for about that time and I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more and more Nats problems pop up.


                                                                                  Here are a few of the problems.
                                                                                  #1 if you want to shave you are going to shave. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a complete noob. If a program wants to shave they'll dish out the bucks and make damn sure they are shaving. You can blame MPA2 all you want for including that feature. Yes I agree it was wrong to make it SO easy to shave. But think about this, if they included it is because there was a DEMAND for it. They made a bad business decision to include it however webmasters are making an even worse business decision by DEMANDING and USING shave functions.

                                                                                  #2 The more features an affiliate software program has the more problems you are looking at. I'm a stats freak. In an ideal world I'd be able to get every stat I could possibly imagine. Unfortunately that doesn't work well in our industry. Sure it's nice to know all your stats and log and track every single thing. However that puts a huge load on your server and greatly increases your chances for disaster. The majority of issues that have come up with other affiliate software programs have been server issues, database issues, mysql issues, corrupt data issues. All the issues seemed to have one thing in common the program was trying to do too much. That is why we decided to use a program that basically tracks only what i need. Hits and Sales and I keep my password management 100% seperate from our affiliate program.

                                                                                  #3 If a program like Nats and Mpa2 is popular and sells well then the company gets bogged down on orders and can't dedicate enough time to you and your problems. I spoke with Oystein about this. They didn't expect the growth they had and as a result they quickly wound up understaffed. That is a tough position to be in. That is why it isn't always best to go with the most popular affiliate software. It's important to go with a company that:
                                                                                  - provides a solid software that will do the job.
                                                                                  - has the man power to do custom work for you and take care of your custom needs in a timely manner.
                                                                                  - has the man power to take care of all your problems in a timely manner.

                                                                                  You have to remember these programs are built to be sold to the masses. Personally I always have custom requests for my programs. Any company that can't respond to that won't get my business.
                                                                                  I hate to quote such a long speil , but i couldnt pick any one part to comment on , it was all good

                                                                                  great post
                                                                                  hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • shuki
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Aug 2004
                                                                                    • 3070

                                                                                    #91
                                                                                    Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                    I dont think anyone is insinuating NATS is doing anything intentionally or that they would help anyone do anything like this.

                                                                                    The problem is if your affiliates arent getting paid , they will move on to more lucrative sponsors.

                                                                                    Unless a sponsor is on the ball they arent going to notice , because glitches like this mean the sponsor gets MORE money and the affiliates LESS, so everything appears better until your affiliate base starts leaving for better ratio's.

                                                                                    If the problem isn't addressed what else can you do really but switch software.
                                                                                    Very good point
                                                                                    Looking to buy established paysites contact me [email protected]

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • iBanker
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Dec 2004
                                                                                      • 2758

                                                                                      #92
                                                                                      Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
                                                                                      I had a similar problem too, but it was with wts bank. Actually nats wasnt reporting that they were cancelled or bounced checks so I paid out on about 270 checks. This seems like something as simple as a post back error. Shaving? no.. Its just a miscomunication of the back ends. That can actually be retro imported pretty easially. im almost certain of that. In all honesty, this is something that you should have caught sooner and mentioned it to nathan. I caught my postback problem within a few days and it was fixed in a few minutes.
                                                                                      Duke
                                                                                      It was mentioned MONTHS ago and still wasn't fixed. Did someone from NATS have you say that?
                                                                                      www.JasonandAlex.com
                                                                                      Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Kimmykim
                                                                                        bitchslapping zebras!!!!!
                                                                                        • Jun 2001
                                                                                        • 16015

                                                                                        #93
                                                                                        Originally posted by iBanker
                                                                                        It is perfect. Prove me wrong. You can't.
                                                                                        Chris, I can do many things, and nothing is ever perfect.

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Jon2
                                                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                                                          • Aug 2001
                                                                                          • 2875

                                                                                          #94
                                                                                          I need my sig space in this thread...

                                                                                          I need 2 cents

                                                                                          Jon

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Trax
                                                                                            [----------------------]
                                                                                            • Aug 2001
                                                                                            • 14486

                                                                                            #95
                                                                                            Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                            im pretty sure OCCASH is using NATS and showing RAW first page hits. Or at least UNIQUE first page hits.

                                                                                            Infact when realitycash first started they were showing First page hits , then they changed it.
                                                                                            yes... i kwno
                                                                                            to me it seems as if programs can choose how to display the numbers...
                                                                                            I would prefer them being forced to show first page hits and 2nd page.
                                                                                            They can display the conversion rates how they want to (even based on 2nd page hits).
                                                                                            I just wanna see first page raw and unique for myself...
                                                                                            thats what I meant

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Triple 6
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Feb 2002
                                                                                              • 5394

                                                                                              #96
                                                                                              drama drama drama
                                                                                              SIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Alex From San Diego
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • May 2001
                                                                                                • 1642

                                                                                                #97
                                                                                                Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
                                                                                                I had a similar problem too, but it was with wts bank. Actually nats wasnt reporting that they were cancelled or bounced checks so I paid out on about 270 checks. This seems like something as simple as a post back error. Shaving? no.. Its just a miscomunication of the back ends. That can actually be retro imported pretty easially. im almost certain of that. In all honesty, this is something that you should have caught sooner and mentioned it to nathan. I caught my postback problem within a few days and it was fixed in a few minutes.
                                                                                                Duke
                                                                                                What makes you think we didn't point it out? We would be ignorant to have not pointed it out.
                                                                                                We are what we repeatedly do.-Aristotle

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • Theo
                                                                                                  HAL 9000
                                                                                                  • May 2001
                                                                                                  • 34515

                                                                                                  #98
                                                                                                  Not having to do with nats, but just ask yourself how many program owners besides Alex and Jason would spend the time to manually credit these sales. I can tell you very few.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • wdsguy
                                                                                                    Ryde or Die
                                                                                                    • Dec 2002
                                                                                                    • 19568

                                                                                                    #99
                                                                                                    Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                                                                    yes this is true. Without being on the sponsors servers theres no way to tell.

                                                                                                    RealityCash for example was "missing" data on one of its servers for FHG's , as a result when surfers clicked the fhg's they were sent to adult.com's 10dollarcash program and the hits werent tracked at all with NATS. Zero ZIp NADA . you never made a cent nor a click. Isolated small example , but this could be done on purpose in a rotational method so as not to be caught, and nobody would ever know.

                                                                                                    It was a pure Rsync problem. Wasn't done on purpose.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • xlogger
                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                      • Jul 2004
                                                                                                      • 9507

                                                                                                      #100
                                                                                                      100 errors..

                                                                                                      ----------
                                                                                                      XLOGGER [REFLECTED] [OH]

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...