So I guess that peice of Evidences' going to fuck Jacko up eh? - GoFuckYourself.com

Head · 03-28-2005, 09:52 AM

They have his and a boys fingerprints on a skin book.

candyflip · 03-28-2005, 10:00 AM

When I was 15, you could have probably dusted my father's stack of mags and found both of our finger prints as well.

I don't see how this evidence proves anything.

escorpio · 03-28-2005, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

When I was 15, you could have probably dusted my father's stack of mags and found both of our finger prints as well.

I don't see how this evidence proves anything.

I agree. Every time I hear this I remember a friend's father that had a big stack of Playboys he thought he had hidden in the garage that every kid in the neighborhood looked at.

Johny Traffic · 03-28-2005, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

When I was 15, you could have probably dusted my father's stack of mags and found both of our finger prints as well.

I don't see how this evidence proves anything.

Jacko isnt the boys father.

LeeNoga · 03-28-2005, 10:08 AM

The conviction has to be "beyond reasonable doubt", and there will always be a small percentage of doubt, look at Blake, I believe he killed his wife or was part of the conspiracy but he walked and so will Jacko.

Screaming · 03-28-2005, 10:09 AM

that whole thing is fucked up

candyflip · 03-28-2005, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johny Traffic

Jacko isnt the boys father.

Then we can take it a step further.

When I was that age and perhaps even a bit younger, I also knew where most of my friend's parents hid their porn as well.

The parents never gave it to us, showed us where it was or anything of that nature. BUT we sure had our hands all over it anytime we had the chance.

This evidence still doesn't prove anything.

Pipeline Q · 03-28-2005, 10:12 AM

Some stations who have it out against Jackson are leaving the bit of info out that authorities gave the kid the porn mag to look at during the grand jury hearings BEFORE it was fingerprinted. A huge blunder that throws this evidence out the window.

nojob · 03-28-2005, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pipeline Q

Some stations who have it out against Jackson are leaving the bit of info out that authorities gave the kid the porn mag to look at during the grand jury hearings BEFORE it was fingerprinted. A huge blunder that throws this evidence out the window.

that is very true, I think he will be ok.

03-28-2005, 09:52 AM	#1
Head Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Starship Enterprise Posts: 8,278	So I guess that peice of Evidences' going to fuck Jacko up eh? They have his and a boys fingerprints on a skin book. __________________

03-28-2005, 10:00 AM	#2
candyflip Carpe Visio Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New York Posts: 43,064	When I was 15, you could have probably dusted my father's stack of mags and found both of our finger prints as well. I don't see how this evidence proves anything. __________________ Spend you some brain. Email Me

03-28-2005, 10:09 AM	#6
Screaming I can change this!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18,972	that whole thing is fucked up __________________

03-28-2005, 10:08 AM	#5
LeeNoga Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Egg & Sperm Mutation Posts: 3,043	The conviction has to be "beyond reasonable doubt", and there will always be a small percentage of doubt, look at Blake, I believe he killed his wife or was part of the conspiracy but he walked and so will Jacko.

03-28-2005, 10:12 AM	#8
Pipeline Q Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 3,891	Some stations who have it out against Jackson are leaving the bit of info out that authorities gave the kid the porn mag to look at during the grand jury hearings BEFORE it was fingerprinted. A huge blunder that throws this evidence out the window.