GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why can't Iran have nukes? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=442890)

Icon 03-11-2005 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukeboxfrank
I had some nasty things to say to the USA haters but I am tried and it really would be a waste of time. All I can say is it must suck to be you. I hope things get better for you so you could move on with your lives.
50 fucking fires.......0.00 hate....

I don't hate you...In fact....I may love you....... :winkwink:

why don't we hook up some time and start some fires? We could burn down people's porches....In fact we could even go to Toronto and burn some stuff there...togethor....
I love you man....just can't handle the Current administration...but YOU, I couldn't hate you man.

jukeboxfrank 03-11-2005 07:12 PM
lol Ok man I got some extra Gas.

directfiesta 03-11-2005 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukeboxfrank
lol Ok man I got some extra Gas.
LOL...

I'll bring the matches :winkwink:

Icon 03-11-2005 07:15 PM
anyone remember that song? 'If you love3 somebody then set them on fire'?
Dead Milkmen, early 90's?

you guys are tops! :1orglaugh

sonofsam 03-11-2005 07:18 PM
hold on, if theres gonna be stuff to do with fire and toronto.... count me in ! :)

pornguy 03-11-2005 07:18 PM
Because they will leave them out in the sand and they will get all dirty.
Why do you think??

Rochard 03-11-2005 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
The only country that CAN'T have nukes is the USA. Many other countries have a nuclear weapon (including all-hated "empire of evil" Russia) but they were too wise to not use it. The only country that has used nukes on people (the innocent people I'd say, because Hiroshima wasn't a military object) was the USA. IMHO the USA + nuclear weapon is the same as monkey with a grenade... nobody knows when a stupid animal blast it.
I was waiting for this.

At the time during WWII the first nuclear weapons were just a larger bomb. During WWII, the US and England firebombed entire cities off of the map, doing much more damage in the process. At the time, it was common for both sides to wipe out entire cities. Germany, for example, blindly launched rockets into London - and didn't give a damn what they hit.

Oh, let Iran have it's nukes. Let them blow one up in NYC, Washing DC, Vegas..... And watch the US turn every fucking Muslim country into a huge glass parking lot. I'd bet my life that if a nuke ever went off on US soil, the US will fire nukes into any country that may or may not have nukes that we aren't friendly with.

directfiesta 03-11-2005 07:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RocHard
I was waiting for this.

At the time during WWII the first nuclear weapons were just a larger bomb. During WWII, the US and England firebombed entire cities off of the map, doing much more damage in the process. At the time, it was common for both sides to wipe out entire cities. Germany, for example, blindly launched rockets into London - and didn't give a damn what they hit. .
True,,, Many many deaths and city wiped out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RocHard
Oh, let Iran have it's nukes. Let them blow one up in NYC, Washing DC, Vegas..... And watch the US turn every fucking Muslim country into a huge glass parking lot. I'd bet my life that if a nuke ever went off on US soil, the US will fire nukes into any country that may or may not have nukes that we aren't friendly with.
:warning

Why is it always " them" attacking only the " US" ... Up to know,. I feel it has been the other way around ....

WarChild 03-11-2005 07:44 PM
Iran can't have nukes because the USA says so, period. Like it or not, the big kid on the block still makes the playground rules. That's life.

Icon 03-11-2005 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
Iran can't have nukes because the USA says so, period. Like it or not, the big kid on the block still makes the playground rules. That's life.
A.k.A. Thug? Play nice...be civilised.

WarChild 03-11-2005 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon
A.k.A. Thug? Play nice...be civilised.
Human nature is not yet civil. It's a wonderful ideal, but it's not reality.

The meek may indeed one day inherit the earth, but not this day.

jukeboxfrank 03-11-2005 08:33 PM
Well the only thing that has stopped the stupid 20 yr cycle of world wars ( or large
wars) has been the nukes....A weapon so terrible that a frontal attack is unheard of.
But now we have people that don't care if they live of die as long as they kill you.
Maybe it is time for all to give up the bomb....At least we go back to killing only a small
group of people at a time.

Hawkeye 03-11-2005 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
WTF does a country like Iran need nukes for?
Hopefully they will destroy Israel.

just a punk 03-12-2005 04:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RocHard
I was waiting for this.

At the time during WWII the first nuclear weapons were just a larger bomb. During WWII, the US and England firebombed entire cities off of the map, doing much more damage in the process. At the time, it was common for both sides to wipe out entire cities. Germany, for example, blindly launched rockets into London - and didn't give a damn what they hit.

Oh, let Iran have it's nukes. Let them blow one up in NYC, Washing DC, Vegas..... And watch the US turn every fucking Muslim country into a huge glass parking lot. I'd bet my life that if a nuke ever went off on US soil, the US will fire nukes into any country that may or may not have nukes that we aren't friendly with.
Is that justifies that the USA did? Hell NO! As I already said above, a stupid monkey must be keept away from grenades. :2 cents:

Theo 03-12-2005 04:50 AM
I wish nobody had nuclear weapons.

xclusive 03-12-2005 04:59 AM
they are the biggest supporters of terrorism that's enough for me

just a punk 03-12-2005 05:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xclusive
they are the biggest supporters of terrorism that's enough for me
Do you mean USA? As far as I know, Osama is a former CIA agent. Yes, you are right, the USA have supported Osama in 80's, they are support Chechen terrorists now.

webcrawler 03-12-2005 06:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RocHard
I was waiting for this.

At the time during WWII the first nuclear weapons were just a larger bomb. During WWII, the US and England firebombed entire cities off of the map, doing much more damage in the process. At the time, it was common for both sides to wipe out entire cities. Germany, for example, blindly launched rockets into London - and didn't give a damn what they hit.

Oh, let Iran have it's nukes. Let them blow one up in NYC, Washing DC, Vegas..... And watch the US turn every fucking Muslim country into a huge glass parking lot. I'd bet my life that if a nuke ever went off on US soil, the US will fire nukes into any country that may or may not have nukes that we aren't friendly with.
I agree. Imagine if a terrorist like Bin Laden has access to nuclear weapons.
Anyone seen "SUM OF ALL FEARS"?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:46 AM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123