No matter how revenue a girl like that could bring in. I have standards. There is no way i would promote a site that targets pedos. Fuck that!

I would not use the words little, or young, pre teen. I personally think the design needs work as well.

You say she is well over 18. yet she is 19. what exactly is "way over" to you?

picture quality is VERY low. The girl truly isn't anything special, except that perhaps she is 18 going on 13. She doesn't have that "look" that would make her most men's fantasy.

The site design blows chunks... paintshop, I assume?

Alex

You people are weird, she looks 25 to me.

Bull fucking shit she looks 25............





SHE LOOKS FUCKING 15 or 16 @ MOST! She is underage and I have reported the site to proper authorities.

Don't change a thing. It's not playboy quality but you are
after the old perverts not the college pukes.

Test it out and see how it goes.

I used to do about 50K per month in print ads some years
ago for non adult and the worst looking ads pulled the best.
My partner and I have had many fights over the ads because
he always wanted full color and pretty ads that fucking
sucked for sales !

Was that ugly design done by the ugly model? Or maybe you are trying to make the design as ugly as she is?

Your catering to pedos which makes you just as sick as someone who makes a pedo site. Whether the content is legal or not.

Agreed: Your walking on dangerous ground if you try to make the content/girls look under 18 ... that's wrong, period.

Thank God for laws.

People like you are exactly the reason that we have legislation. Intelligent people do not plod through life on the basis of "looks" and general "feelings in the air". There are defined parameters that we all must abide by. The law states that models must be over 18 the law does not say, "Unless they 'look' younger then they have to be 25." If you go to a bar to order a drink and you "look" too young to legally consume alcohol what happens? The bartender asks for proof of legal age and once you provide that proof you are treated accordingly. Would it be fair to deny people things like drinks, or jobs or the ability to vote based on how old they "look"? Hell no.

A lot of you guys are saying that I should not publish this site because the model "looks too young". That attitude shows abject ignorance.

I point to sites like http://www.littleapril.com/ as an example. Does this girl "look" old enough to pose naked? Who am I to question the law?

Legal is legal and spouting off that something should be one way or another based on look and feel is asinine.

she looks young.. ;/

woah quality of images is shit, girl looks 12 too.

terrible design

50

damn she looks way fucking young

Back to that "look" deal... jeeze you people blow my mind.

please blow up your computer

She's awful, even if she's 18. And of course design is the crappiest, in 1996 it could be ok.
Seems like this guy is just laughing at GFY :1orglaugh

I remember making a boat load of cash in '96 so that is very encouraging.

I am laughing at the narrow-minded people who base their moral judgement on "looks and feelings".

The site will be live on Monday and we are planning a full ad campaign. I will keep you posted on conversion rates and gross sales.

brrr. not bad