Canadians should worry more about their own government than America's - GoFuckYourself.com

12clicks · 02-23-2005, 12:40 PM

This is so comical:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...da_missiles_dc
"""Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin decided not to sign on to the U.S. missile defense network despite urging from Washington because the political risks were too great, a senior official said Wednesday."""

political risks?

"oops, sorry Dean Martin, this missle will fall short of the US. Duck!"

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 12:42 PM

I predict this thread will descend into stupid name calling

Manowar · 02-23-2005, 12:47 PM

i'll pick up the future game modification domains now

coldwar2game.com
operation-nuke-korea.com
Destroy-iran-game.com

BVF · 02-23-2005, 12:52 PM

If you want to beat 12 clicks in an argument, just keep putting

after every fucking sentence.

Adult Site Traffic · 02-23-2005, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF

If you want to beat 12 clicks in an argument, just keep putting

after every fucking sentence.

That's about the intelligence level it all boils down to

Adult Site Traffic · 02-23-2005, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK

I predict this thread will descend into stupid name calling

Who you calling a stoopid head, you stoopid rag head arab stoopid head noobie democrat 3rd world Canadian.

ronaldo · 02-23-2005, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

political risks?

By political risks, I'm pretty sure they're referring to HIS and his parties political future in Canada...not the "Risks" associated with siding with the U.S.

Pipecrew · 02-23-2005, 01:05 PM

I'am sure 12clicks will be the first one attempting to run across into Canada if anything ever happens.

Cassie · 02-23-2005, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

This is so comical:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...da_missiles_dc
"""Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin decided not to sign on to the U.S. missile defense network despite urging from Washington because the political risks were too great, a senior official said Wednesday."""

political risks?

"oops, sorry Dean Martin, this missle will fall short of the US. Duck!"

interesting

Odie · 02-23-2005, 01:06 PM

you had to start something today didn't you Ron??:P

12clicks · 02-23-2005, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Odie

you had to start something today didn't you Ron??:P

I'm bored.

Notice how quickly internet trash like adult site trafic and bfv take the bait.

rambler · 02-23-2005, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Canadians should worry more about their own government than America's

Yah you're right. You are pretty comical

Our government has only delivered 8 balanced budgets in a row again positioning Canada as the BEST debt-reduction performer among the world's rich G-7 nations, ironicaly while being accused of spending money like drunken sailors.

Bush has projected another deficit budget($390 billion) following a revenue-to-spending shortfall of $427 Billion(3.5% of US GDP) for the current fiscal year.

We already participate in a N American ballistic defence program with the US (NORAD). By "political risk" I'm pretty sure he's refering to Canadian politics not American. But anyways, thanks for caring about what our government has to say.(maybe you should pay more attention to your own gov.)

12clicks · 02-23-2005, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

By political risks, I'm pretty sure they're referring to HIS and his parties political future in Canada...not the "Risks" associated with siding with the U.S.

Thats exactly what they are referring to. That makes it worse yet.

sherie · 02-23-2005, 01:18 PM

LOL bored I take it?

12clicks · 02-23-2005, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rambler

Yah you're right. You are pretty comical

Our government has only delivered 8 balanced budgets in a row again positioning Canada as the BEST debt-reduction performer among the world's rich G-7 nations, ironicaly while being accused of spending money like drunken sailors.

Bush has projected another deficit budget($390 billion) following a revenue-to-spending shortfall of $427 Billion(3.5% of US GDP) for the current fiscal year.

We already participate in a N American ballistic defence program with the US (NORAD). By "political risk" I'm pretty sure he's refering to Canadian politics not American. But anyways, thanks for caring about what our government has to say.(maybe you should pay more attention to your own gov.)

its easy to run a balanced budget when you tax the shit out of your people.

Adult Site Traffic · 02-23-2005, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I'm bored.

Notice how quickly internet trash like adult site trafic and bfv take the bait.

12clicks · 02-23-2005, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sherie

LOL bored I take it?

Odie's trying to lure me away from this with cybersex.
little does she know, I'm gay.

ronaldo · 02-23-2005, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

its easy to run a balanced budget when you tax the shit out of your people.

sherie · 02-23-2005, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Odie's trying to lure me away from this with cybersex.
little does she know, I'm gay.

I thought that was common knowledge in the circle...she's hasn't been getting reliable info ;)))

Odie · 02-23-2005, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Odie's trying to lure me away from this with cybersex.
little does she know, I'm gay.

A-HEM *clears throat* I beg your pardon?? YOU started it!!! I'm trying to convert you didn't you know that Ron??

12clicks · 02-23-2005, 01:35 PM

so, ok. I'm stripped naked with 3 burly men standing around me. continue.

12clicks · 02-23-2005, 01:36 PM

shit, disregard that last message everyone.

damn icq..........

Odie · 02-23-2005, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

so, ok. I'm stripped naked with 3 burly men standing around me. continue.

and one of them is bending you over and the other is giving you the reacharound..lol

pornguy · 02-23-2005, 01:38 PM

they dont need to sing anything. Do you think that the US will let anything bad happen to them?? Hell no. If we did, then we would not have any place to go on vacation or have them to laugh at on our beaches.

Thrawn$ · 02-23-2005, 01:39 PM

martin is over, Stephen harper is the next prime minister and he's a pro bush christian biatch

Rich · 02-23-2005, 01:41 PM

Imagine that, a government in a democracy listening to the will of the people. How strange.

BVF · 02-23-2005, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I'm bored.

Notice how quickly internet trash like adult site trafic and bfv take the bait.

Bait about what? I'm not Canadian and I didn't enter into your argument about politics.....

So just posting how to beat you by saying anything idiotic and then putting a

behind it is taking the bait?

I laugh.....He He

Odie · 02-23-2005, 01:47 PM

ahhh! he's gone for the day..so much for drama..I have to put my popcorn away now

Rui · 02-23-2005, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF

Bait about what? I'm not Canadian and I didn't enter into your argument about politics.....

So just posting how to beat you by saying anything idiotic and then putting a

behind it is taking the bait?

I laugh.....He He

don't waste your time man

Basic_man · 02-23-2005, 01:49 PM

12click, you are such a dumbass! You probably voted for bush..

xxxdesign-net · 02-23-2005, 02:00 PM

Thats the shitty thing about a minority government... Shitty parties like NPD, Bloc and the conservatives can dictate to Martin what to do or they'll threaten to launch a new election...

THere's nothing wrong with approving the missile defense.. it doesnt cost us anything... and we may one day take advantage of it...

ronaldo · 02-23-2005, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

Thats the shitty thing about a minority government... Shitty parties like NPD, Bloc and the conservatives can dictate to Martin what to do or they'll threaten to launch a new election...

THere's nothing wrong with approving the missile defense.. it doesnt cost us anything... and we may one day take advantage of it...

Please keep your entirely rational, albeit minority opinion to yourself.

There's no place for that on GFY.

Rich · 02-23-2005, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

Thats the shitty thing about a minority government... Shitty parties like NPD, Bloc and the conservatives can dictate to Martin what to do or they'll threaten to launch a new election...

THere's nothing wrong with approving the missile defense.. it doesnt cost us anything... and we may one day take advantage of it...

Actually there are many, almost countless downsides, and it would have cost us billions. Good thing our government pays closer attention than you do.

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

THere's nothing wrong with approving the missile defense

1. It doesn't work

2. It will create a new global arms race and lead to the weaponization of space

Rich · 02-23-2005, 02:13 PM

Carolyn Parrish has a pretty decent resource regarding SDI on her website, for the misinformed children who still buy the CNN line that this is a realistic, functional, defensive system that won't cost Canada a penny.

http://www.carolynparrish.parl.gc.ca/news/Ballistic%20Missile%20Defence%20(BMD).html

xxxdesign-net · 02-23-2005, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK

1. It doesn't work

2. It will create a new global arms race and lead to the weaponization of space

It doesnt work...? So...? It doesnt cost us anything... If it works 1 time out of 3... thats good enough to me...

Having a defense system will create a new global arms race..? WHere did you get that?? From NDP's Jack Layton ? LOL ... Logically weak... Let get rid of Norad then.. lets not protect our borders then.. lets get rid of the army then... Hey.. there's nothing wrong with "DEFENSIVE" weapons ....

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 02:16 PM

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?cha...4483414B7F0000

This is a good article from Scientific American

xxxdesign-net · 02-23-2005, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

Actually there are many, almost countless downsides, and it would have cost us billions. Good thing our government pays closer attention than you do.

Hey.. find me a reliable article where it says that it would cost us something... The US are only looking for a moral support... I think they have said it enough times when Bush came to Canada...

Rich · 02-23-2005, 02:18 PM

Grow up dude, seriously. Learn to read before you talk. The complete plan for SDI calls for offensive nuclear weapons in space, if you don't understand on your own why that would start an arms race, well, I don't know what to say.

Rinaldo · 02-23-2005, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Odie's trying to lure me away from this with cybersex.
little does she know, I'm gay.

rofl LMAO that's fucking perfect !

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

Having a defense system will create a new global arms race..? WHere did you get that?? From NDP's Jack Layton ? LOL ... Logically weak...

China and Russia have both already said they are developing new missiles to counter the missile defence system (even though the current missile system couldn't even destroy existing missiles).

It will create a new global arms race and lead to the weaponization of space

xxxdesign-net · 02-23-2005, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK

China and Russia have both already said they are developing new missiles to counter the missile defence system (even though the current missile system couldn't even destroy existing missiles).

First.. link? Second... so? How are those missiles dangerous to us...?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK

It will create a new global arms race and lead to the weaponization of space

ONe, weaponization of the space will or will not happen independently of those DEFENSE shield missiles.. please... Its also something which the "world" could declare illigal... THis is not done yet

Second... for the global arms race, your exemple with Russia and China seems weak...

Rich · 02-23-2005, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

Hey.. find me a reliable article where it says that it would cost us something... The US are only looking for a moral support... I think they have said it enough times when Bush came to Canada...

What did old George say he wanted from us? Just "moral support"? Well if he said that, it must be true. He must not want to place missles and troops in Canada, and have us pay if we want to be protected ourselves. I mean, if Bush said it, you know it's 100% true. He'd never bend the truth to get what he wants.

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

First.. link? Second... so? How are those missiles dangerous to us...?

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0104/p09s02-coop.html

If you're questioning why those missiles are dangerous to you, then why build a missile defence shield at all?

It sounds like you haven't read much about this topic.

Rich · 02-23-2005, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

First.. link? Second... so? How are those missiles dangerous to us...?

ONe, weaponization of the space will or will not happen independently of those DEFENSE shield missiles.. please... Its also something which the "world" could declare illigal... THis is not done yet

Second... for the global arms race, your exemple with Russia and China seems weak...

Is this guy kidding?

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

for the global arms race, your exemple with Russia and China seems weak...

ummm....in the topic of global arms races, you think using China and Russia as examples are weak?

Do you remember this little thing called the "Cold War"?

Rich · 02-23-2005, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

First.. link? Second... so? How are those missiles dangerous to us...?

ONe, weaponization of the space will or will not happen independently of those DEFENSE shield missiles.. please... Its also something which the "world" could declare illigal... THis is not done yet

Second... for the global arms race, your exemple with Russia and China seems weak...

Seriously, how old are you? These comments blow my mind.

You realize that the "world" doesn't open up and make laws, right? Countries have to set rules themselves, which they do by the way of treaties. There was an anti-ballistic missile treaty, which was as close to the "world making it illegal" as possible. Bush has withdrawn from this treaty to go ahead with SDI, and Canada would have to do the same to be a part of it.

BRISK · 02-23-2005, 02:36 PM

By the way, if using Russia and China as examples in the global arms race is weak, what countries should I use? Fiji? Sweden? Uruguay? New Zealand?

Rich · 02-23-2005, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK

ummm....in the topic of global arms races, you think using China and Russia as examples are weak?

Do you remember this little thing called the "Cold War"?

That's the one that really blew my mind. If not China and Russia, who?

I honestly think this guy has a small child's understanding of the world, I'm going to stop wasting my time.

Thrawn$ · 02-23-2005, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

Is this guy kidding?

nahh
i think he's just a

02-23-2005, 12:40 PM	#1
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,789	Canadians should worry more about their own government than America's This is so comical: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...da_missiles_dc """Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin decided not to sign on to the U.S. missile defense network despite urging from Washington because the political risks were too great, a senior official said Wednesday.""" political risks? "oops, sorry Dean Martin, this missle will fall short of the US. Duck!" __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

02-23-2005, 12:42 PM	#2
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	I predict this thread will descend into stupid name calling __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded. Last edited by BRISK; 02-23-2005 at 12:45 PM..

02-23-2005, 12:52 PM	#4
BVF Black Vagina Finder Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Midwest Posts: 13,975	If you want to beat 12 clicks in an argument, just keep putting after every fucking sentence. __________________ Black Pussy Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!

02-23-2005, 01:06 PM	#10
Odie Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: The WATER BABY! Posts: 7,040	you had to start something today didn't you Ron??:P __________________ Odie [email protected] Are you Mobile???? MMACanada ICQ # 166208354 See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

02-23-2005, 01:18 PM	#14
sherie Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 7,020	LOL bored I take it? __________________ AIM sherierocks ICQ 127-296-286 Skype traffichor

02-23-2005, 12:47 PM	#3
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	i'll pick up the future game modification domains now coldwar2game.com operation-nuke-korea.com Destroy-iran-game.com

02-23-2005, 01:05 PM	#8
Pipecrew Master of Gfy.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 14,887	I'am sure 12clicks will be the first one attempting to run across into Canada if anything ever happens.

02-23-2005, 01:35 PM	#21
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,789	so, ok. I'm stripped naked with 3 burly men standing around me. continue. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

02-23-2005, 01:36 PM	#22
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,789	shit, disregard that last message everyone. damn icq.......... __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

02-23-2005, 01:38 PM	#24
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	they dont need to sing anything. Do you think that the US will let anything bad happen to them?? Hell no. If we did, then we would not have any place to go on vacation or have them to laugh at on our beaches. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

02-23-2005, 01:39 PM	#25
Thrawn$ Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Mtl Posts: 4,596	martin is over, Stephen harper is the next prime minister and he's a pro bush christian biatch __________________ Tracking 202 \| Start Tracking PPC Campaigns Like A Pro

02-23-2005, 01:41 PM	#26
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	Imagine that, a government in a democracy listening to the will of the people. How strange.

02-23-2005, 01:47 PM	#28
Odie Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: The WATER BABY! Posts: 7,040	ahhh! he's gone for the day..so much for drama..I have to put my popcorn away now __________________ Odie [email protected] Are you Mobile???? MMACanada ICQ # 166208354 See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

02-23-2005, 01:49 PM	#30
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	12click, you are such a dumbass! You probably voted for bush.. __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

02-23-2005, 02:00 PM	#31
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	Thats the shitty thing about a minority government... Shitty parties like NPD, Bloc and the conservatives can dictate to Martin what to do or they'll threaten to launch a new election... THere's nothing wrong with approving the missile defense.. it doesnt cost us anything... and we may one day take advantage of it...

02-23-2005, 02:13 PM	#35
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	Carolyn Parrish has a pretty decent resource regarding SDI on her website, for the misinformed children who still buy the CNN line that this is a realistic, functional, defensive system that won't cost Canada a penny. http://www.carolynparrish.parl.gc.ca/news/Ballistic%20Missile%20Defence%20(BMD).html

02-23-2005, 02:16 PM	#37
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?cha...4483414B7F0000 This is a good article from Scientific American __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

02-23-2005, 02:18 PM	#39
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	Grow up dude, seriously. Learn to read before you talk. The complete plan for SDI calls for offensive nuclear weapons in space, if you don't understand on your own why that would start an arms race, well, I don't know what to say.

02-23-2005, 02:36 PM	#48
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	By the way, if using Russia and China as examples in the global arms race is weak, what countries should I use? Fiji? Sweden? Uruguay? New Zealand? __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.