Fiddy Cent

troops and missile on the Canadian land..? Oh the horror!! Why do you think might happen from that.. concretely..?

Second.. if they ask us for money... We CAN say no you know..

btw.. here's a good article on the subject..
http://www.canoe.com/CNEWS/Canada/20...237884-cp.html

Without a partnership on the BMD ... we might just lose NORAD...

:2 cents:

Course it will! :winkwink:

It's a banal thread started by a retard donkey - but that means some disrespect to donkeys :-)

I think he wants you to use countries like Haiti and Qatar..they have a stronger hold in the arms race lol...

:1orglaugh

lol.. do I really need to explain what I meant by "world" ?? REally? Should I have used a word like Convention to make it clearer for you?

Oh.. and Treaties can be modified and renogotiated to fit the times...

The ABM Treaty was signed in 1972 ...

India. Pakistan. North Korea. Japan (don't laugh, they have the technology, and if the nationalist sentiment grows it could be bad news), Israel (What? The zionists biting the hand that feeds? Don't rule it out.), Germany, France...

Basically, if someone has a missile, there's a possibility it'll be used. It's currently unthinkable that, say, Japan would get uppity... but then it was unthinkable that men could fly, that women could vote, or that a little guy with 1 ball and a funny stache could use an economic downturn and a country's nationalism to brainwash the population into genocide and empire.

For the record, I think 'missile shields' in their current incarnation are retarded, for the basic reason that they just plain ol' DON'T WORK. The 'patriot' missile system is a perfect example, with reportedly less than 1-in-5 success rate (and possibly much lower), and that was only against a single re-entry vehicle that could be tracked from launch. This system they want to throw money at is something that can barely, if the weather is right and the stars are in the right alignment, take out single reentry, non-obscured, non-decoyed ballistic only weapons. Add ANY factor to countermeasure the system and it's rendered essentially useless. A factor like powered re-entry, or MIRVing warheads, or simply taking the fucking warhead in a briefcase or crate into the center of town and leaving it on top of a relatively tall building.

Systems MIGHT be developed to take out these things... imo, projectile vs. projectile will never amount to much more than a convient excuse to line the pockets of the mil contractors. Energy weapons vs. projectiles though, that's far more likely to be effective, and THAT'S where the weaponization of space comes in. Laser and particle accelerator platforms orbiting that can melt the fuckers mid-air. Of course, the problem with that kind of scenerio is that if you can melt a missile, you can melt a city... once that happens, control of the world is lost to those who's fingers are on the buttons, and those people are NOT going to be your favorite government du jour, it'll be the corporations. :2 cents:

Sorry I didn't decend into frivilous name-calling. I'll try to be more banal in the future. :thumbsup

Russia was the main threat then , the treaty was signed with them ... now the theat is other nations.. THe US doesnt have a treaty with other nation and shouldnt have their hands tied because of it..
ANd btw... Russia has missile defense system to protect Moscow ..

Heh. Nice. :thumbsup

hahaha, all the trolls took the bait. webby with his nothingness, Rich with his loud talk and no links. too typical :1orglaugh

you two must be related. You both either lie to make your point or are just unaware of the world around you.

http://www.japantoday.com/e/?content...at=8&id=328931


WASHINGTON ? The United States carried out a successful interceptor flight test for a sea-based ballistic missile defense system on Thursday, the U.S. Defense Department's Missile Defense Agency said.

It was the fifth successful interception in six tests for the Standard Missile 3 interceptor, the type which Japan plans to buy and install on its Aegis-system destroyers when it begins establishing its missile defense shield from the end of fiscal 2006. (Kyodo News)

he must have run out of cheaters today :1orglaugh

You mean like Americans flooding Canadian politicians with letters urging them not to allow same sex marriages in Canada?

Kindly don't mis-represent the results of one test and claim it has relevance to the other. AEGIS and similar short range systems have around for some time now, with 'variable' success.

I'd be curious to know if these 5-out-of-6 were actual KILLS, with shit blowing up, or just simulated intercepts or 'fly bys'... you'll pardon my skepticism, but these are the same guys who claimed that patriot missiles (which are basically the precursors to this system) took out 75% of incoming SCUDs from Iraq, when really they hit nothing but sky.. before falling to earth and doing damage themselves.

Additionally, these systems are only even somewhat effective against short range ballistics, and pretty useless against short range cruise missiles which are only marginally more difficult to manufacture. There's also a BIG difference between trying to catch an inbound ICBM essentially making a re-entry from the outer atmosphere barrelling downwards at several mach and a sub-sonic just-launched short range missile. There have been zero successful anti ICBM tests to date that I'm aware of.

let me know which of the following words you don't understand so I can explain them to you:
"successful" or "ballistic" or "missile defense system" :1orglaugh

I understood each quite clearly. Perhaps you should re-read my comment so you can undertand what's in there. I'll use smaller words for you next time, if it'll help. :upsidedow

comments are like assholes.
I'll await your links proving that patriot missiles "hit nothing but sky", that the test I quoted have anything to do with "AEGIS and similar short range systems " or that Aegis systems have "'variable' success" or that the test I posted had anything to do with "short range ballistics" or that cruise missiles "are only marginally more difficult to manufacture"

I'll wait. but this is usually the part of the show where you blow away or start explaining how the info is out there but you won't bother getting it. :1orglaugh

Same old shit...bla bla bla Canadians are inferior and Americans are superior pig shit....snore fest propaganda

I hear Canadians have small penises :helpme

shit, I've seen that!