Paysite Owners please answer.. - GoFuckYourself.com

SNOW · 12-02-2001, 01:01 PM

I have a simple question for you.Do the majority of paysites use BSD or Redhate Linux 7.2 for operating systems.. I'm told that redhat linux is the way to go..

Can you give me any input on this please?

Thanks Steve

Amputate Your Head · 12-02-2001, 01:02 PM

Apache.

daNky · 12-02-2001, 01:03 PM

personally i would say go with freebsd, cause redhat is junk!

Dirty F · 12-02-2001, 01:10 PM

Windows Millenium

SNOW · 12-02-2001, 02:10 PM

So is bsd a more common system? From what i hear redhat has more features and add ons..??

Osholio · 12-02-2001, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SNOW:
So is bsd a more common system? From what i hear redhat has more features and add ons..??

Redhat's easier to setup, and supports more hardware. FreeBSD is incredibly stable (on hardware it likes) and bloody fast. However, the new VM in more recent Linux kernels has evened things up in the speed department.

I still think FreeBSD still has the edge, though.

------------------
ClickCash - Better than 1:99 and $50 for signing up
Lightspeed Cash - Converts like crazy

-=HUNGRYMAN=- · 12-02-2001, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss:
Windows Millenium

Aren't we funny today ....LOL

Hooper · 12-02-2001, 02:26 PM

Snow... that is kind of a funny question....

It really depends upon what you need... BSD is probably the most stable OS you'll find, but speed wise i tend to find it's not quite as fast as the newest hottest linux kernel.

However... the other drawback of bsd systems is that they use ELF compilers, so some sw packages simply can't be installed... and others are a royal pain in the ass (e.g. mysql... hint.. use --with-low-memory no matter how much memory you have on freebsd)

Just MHO there... shit.. i still know of some big programs that are using NT systems though... so i don't think there is a "best" for everybody.

SNOW · 12-02-2001, 02:29 PM

Well i have a new server with BSD and my sys admin guy wants to use redhat 7.2..So i really want some opinions on what do do..I was hoping i can see what other people are using..

Thanks for your reply

Steve

jc · 12-02-2001, 02:57 PM

Solaris x86. seriously.

rollin · 12-02-2001, 03:01 PM

snow,
redhat is a real nice operating system as long as your admin knows how to tune it up, and make it nice and secure.
back in the day i could push 200 gigs of traffic a day on a 200mhz with 512mb ram running redhat linux

my admin was great.

SNOW · 12-02-2001, 03:04 PM

Thanks rollin..My admin guy is pushing for redhat,but now the server has to be completely refreshed..Thats why i'm asking for opinions..

cyberpunk · 12-02-2001, 03:25 PM

Solaris on sun boxes.... haven;t tried it for x86 but may give it a try

------------------
got EVIL?.... get EVIL! Make $$ from traffic you didn't even know you had plus earn a bonus on all refered webmasters

over 4000 new images released, for the rest of the month buy one CD get one FREE!

Get PAID on FREE joins and a 50$ signup bonus

jc · 12-02-2001, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cyberpunk:
Solaris on sun boxes.... haven;t tried it for x86 but may give it a try

The shit is hardcore. Better than these little toy os's like Linux and *BSD.

rollin · 12-02-2001, 03:35 PM

snow,
pick an os that you can maintain easily as well...
like starting / stopping apache, commands like that. (easy stuff)
because, your admin will not always be around, and you don't want to pull your hair out because you don't know how to restart apache or some BS like that hehe..

jc · 12-02-2001, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rollin:
snow,
pick an os that you can maintain easily as well...
like starting / stopping apache, commands like that. (easy stuff)
because, your admin will not always be around, and you don't want to pull your hair out because you don't know how to restart apache or some BS like that hehe..

umm. restarting apache is the same, no matter which OS you use.
/[path to apache]/bin/apachectl restart

[This message has been edited by jc (edited 12-02-2001).]

[Labret] · 12-02-2001, 04:17 PM

Unless you are doing the admin shit yourself, your will never notice a difference. Only the tech geeks will compare linux distributions.

Its all linux. If your setting it up yourself, the easiest install I ever had was Suse, then redhat, then bsd.

kmanrox · 12-02-2001, 04:32 PM

bsd is the most secure, and apache for webserver (of course)

------------------
K-MaN
icq 1337988

NicheBucks 50/50
RawPussy TGP
Secret Galleries TGP
Trade Traffic For All Sites at BuiltonPorn

wiZd0m · 12-02-2001, 04:51 PM

How come OpenBSD did not even get mentionned?

It's been 4 years since a remote hole in the default install was found!

[Labret], you might want to give a Try to Mandrake 8+ it's a very cool desktop dist.

Last thing, what ever os you choose, have your admin install a FS with journaling, this is a must nowadays for HAS boxens.

------------------
wiZd0m

Thunder Free Adult Hosting - Fastest servers in the industry

Fortune Pussy Adult Links - The best in adult links

shunga · 12-02-2001, 05:39 PM

Go with whatever your admin people are most comfortable with, the system they can get the most out of. They should be competent enough to make the right choice, and if they're not, then you chose the wrong people.

oscer · 12-02-2001, 08:27 PM

BSD is a more Reliable and Configurable OS

I use BSD on all Server i use For hosting and all my sites Not to mention my Custom apache Config

------------------
Stynk Adult Freehost
FuckHost Freehosting
Quik host Quality Affordable hosting Starting at .80 Per Gig
ICQ 138476871

Brad Mitchell · 12-02-2001, 09:42 PM

I'm sure everyone is going to hollar at me... But I very successfully use Windows 2000 Server. Great performance, great reliability.

Brad
SinEmpire.com

tha_timinator · 12-02-2001, 09:44 PM

security, reliability, speed -> BSD still kicks all the others' ass

we use FreeBSD on our complete server park and never made a better decision.

------------------

sXonic - premium webhosting
"Kicking major ass!"

[This message has been edited by tha_timinator (edited 12-02-2001).]

[This message has been edited by tha_timinator (edited 12-02-2001).]

Jizzman · 12-02-2001, 10:43 PM

apache

------------------
Careful with that axe, Eugene.

MrBrian · 12-03-2001, 12:27 AM

dos

how come you always ask for help. but, never help anyone out.

SNOW · 12-03-2001, 03:08 AM

I wont forget your anal dildo next time brian sorry.. Will buy you a bigger one for the show..Just dont walk funny and hang with the out of the closet people..

Phiber · 12-03-2001, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SNOW:
Well i have a new server with BSD and my sys admin guy wants to use redhat 7.2..So i really want some opinions on what do do..I was hoping i can see what other people are using..

Thanks for your reply

Steve

Well, if your admin wants to run RH then it's most likely bc he knows RH better than BSD. And thus can give you better service on a RH machine.

just a thought

------------------
IT TAKES 40 MUSCELS TO BITCHSLAP AN ADMIN

Make up to 75% recurring!
Sweetblondie.com

SNOW · 12-03-2001, 04:05 AM

Thank you everyone for all your comments.. There is BSD on it now,But my admin guy prefers Redhat linux 7.2 so i guess we have to change it all..

Thanks again

12-02-2001, 01:01 PM	#1
SNOW Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,963	Paysite Owners please answer.. I have a simple question for you.Do the majority of paysites use BSD or Redhate Linux 7.2 for operating systems.. I'm told that redhat linux is the way to go.. Can you give me any input on this please? Thanks Steve

12-02-2001, 01:02 PM	#2
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	Apache.

12-02-2001, 01:03 PM	#3
daNky Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Dunbar, WV USA Posts: 11	personally i would say go with freebsd, cause redhat is junk!

12-02-2001, 01:10 PM	#4
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Windows Millenium

12-02-2001, 02:10 PM	#5
SNOW Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,963	So is bsd a more common system? From what i hear redhat has more features and add ons..??

12-02-2001, 02:26 PM	#8
Hooper Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: A Free America Posts: 2,210	Snow... that is kind of a funny question.... It really depends upon what you need... BSD is probably the most stable OS you'll find, but speed wise i tend to find it's not quite as fast as the newest hottest linux kernel. However... the other drawback of bsd systems is that they use ELF compilers, so some sw packages simply can't be installed... and others are a royal pain in the ass (e.g. mysql... hint.. use --with-low-memory no matter how much memory you have on freebsd) Just MHO there... shit.. i still know of some big programs that are using NT systems though... so i don't think there is a "best" for everybody.

12-02-2001, 02:29 PM	#9
SNOW Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,963	Well i have a new server with BSD and my sys admin guy wants to use redhat 7.2..So i really want some opinions on what do do..I was hoping i can see what other people are using.. Thanks for your reply Steve

12-02-2001, 02:57 PM	#10
jc Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Bay Area, CA, US Posts: 4	Solaris x86. seriously.

12-02-2001, 03:01 PM	#11
rollin Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 436	snow, redhat is a real nice operating system as long as your admin knows how to tune it up, and make it nice and secure. back in the day i could push 200 gigs of traffic a day on a 200mhz with 512mb ram running redhat linux my admin was great.

12-02-2001, 03:04 PM	#12
SNOW Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,963	Thanks rollin..My admin guy is pushing for redhat,but now the server has to be completely refreshed..Thats why i'm asking for opinions..

12-02-2001, 03:25 PM	#13
cyberpunk Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,377	Solaris on sun boxes.... haven;t tried it for x86 but may give it a try ------------------ got EVIL?.... get EVIL! Make $$ from traffic you didn't even know you had plus earn a bonus on all refered webmasters over 4000 new images released, for the rest of the month buy one CD get one FREE! Get PAID on FREE joins and a 50$ signup bonus

12-02-2001, 03:35 PM	#15
rollin Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 436	snow, pick an os that you can maintain easily as well... like starting / stopping apache, commands like that. (easy stuff) because, your admin will not always be around, and you don't want to pull your hair out because you don't know how to restart apache or some BS like that hehe..

12-02-2001, 04:17 PM	#17
[Labret] Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: Са́нкт-Петербу́рг Posts: 10,945	Unless you are doing the admin shit yourself, your will never notice a difference. Only the tech geeks will compare linux distributions. Its all linux. If your setting it up yourself, the easiest install I ever had was Suse, then redhat, then bsd.

12-02-2001, 04:32 PM	#18
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	bsd is the most secure, and apache for webserver (of course) ------------------ K-MaN icq 1337988 NicheBucks 50/50 RawPussy TGP Secret Galleries TGP Trade Traffic For All Sites at BuiltonPorn

12-02-2001, 04:51 PM	#19
wiZd0m Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,526	How come OpenBSD did not even get mentionned? It's been 4 years since a remote hole in the default install was found! [Labret], you might want to give a Try to Mandrake 8+ it's a very cool desktop dist. Last thing, what ever os you choose, have your admin install a FS with journaling, this is a must nowadays for HAS boxens. ------------------ wiZd0m Thunder Free Adult Hosting - Fastest servers in the industry Fortune Pussy Adult Links - The best in adult links

12-02-2001, 05:39 PM	#20
shunga Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Loveland Posts: 994	Go with whatever your admin people are most comfortable with, the system they can get the most out of. They should be competent enough to make the right choice, and if they're not, then you chose the wrong people.

12-02-2001, 08:27 PM	#21
oscer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Baltimore Posts: 2,834	BSD is a more Reliable and Configurable OS I use BSD on all Server i use For hosting and all my sites Not to mention my Custom apache Config ------------------ Stynk Adult Freehost FuckHost Freehosting Quik host Quality Affordable hosting Starting at .80 Per Gig ICQ 138476871

12-02-2001, 09:42 PM	#22
Brad Mitchell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Southfield, MI Posts: 9,812	I'm sure everyone is going to hollar at me... But I very successfully use Windows 2000 Server. Great performance, great reliability. Brad SinEmpire.com

12-02-2001, 09:44 PM	#23
tha_timinator Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands Posts: 590	security, reliability, speed -> BSD still kicks all the others' ass we use FreeBSD on our complete server park and never made a better decision. ------------------ sXonic - premium webhosting "Kicking major ass!" [This message has been edited by tha_timinator (edited 12-02-2001).] [This message has been edited by tha_timinator (edited 12-02-2001).]

12-02-2001, 10:43 PM	#24
Jizzman Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Canada Posts: 379	apache ------------------ Careful with that axe, Eugene.

12-03-2001, 12:27 AM	#25
MrBrian Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2001 Posts: 1,215	dos how come you always ask for help. but, never help anyone out.

12-03-2001, 03:08 AM	#26
SNOW Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,963	I wont forget your anal dildo next time brian sorry.. Will buy you a bigger one for the show..Just dont walk funny and hang with the out of the closet people..

12-03-2001, 04:05 AM	#28
SNOW Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,963	Thank you everyone for all your comments.. There is BSD on it now,But my admin guy prefers Redhat linux 7.2 so i guess we have to change it all.. Thanks again