Is it your opinion that a muslim nation can beat the american military? (assuming the french army is not involved)

Predictable nonsensical rant made a dumb ass druggie. President Clinton may have had an "anti-terrorism apparatus"...and he may have even had some success if he would have used it...but he didn't. He did have opportunities but chose...for whatever his reasons not to take them...thus 9/11. BTW...President Bush is my country's President but he is not President by any choice of mine. Not the first election and not this last election...but of course you have been told this multiple times. I don't expect you to retain any information longer than a couple of hours..."this is your brain on drugs"...Danny boy.

maybe not one but 5?that worries me!!!!i know we kick ass.but do you realize how far the muslim sentiment reaches.

when you people get older and wiser, you will think a little different. The democrats targets young people searching for someone to believe. If they aren't strongwilled, they get them. Usually those people grow out of it, some dont, ie. hippies.

The Vietnamese did. The Chinese did it in Korea. Bush might have known something about that if he hadn't gone AWOL, the fucking coward.

What makes you think they have to beat us in a pitched battle? They're tearing our ass up from the inside out, inspiring brilliant policy like TIPS and the terror alert system, the proposed and current curtailing of our civil rights and the ability of the invididual to be protected from govt intrusion and surveillance. If they win it's not going to be on a battlefield, it'll be when our society is just as closed and ignorant as theirs.

NWO is what it is creating and that will be what effects everyone even the rednecks!!

Our technology and weapon systems give us the advantage. The only threat to face our country and our allies countries are fantatic muslems being supporting by countries with those weapons... ie. Iraq

the more you type, the more stupid you sound

how dare you talk about Bush POTSMOKER.Why don't we all just chug some pabst and kick the dog!oh ya and maybe run the country for the people!

Is that right? Well then why don't you tell me what the Republicans stand for.

Are they free trade or isolationist? Depends which Repub you ask.
Are they for states rights or increased federal power? See the Patriot Act for the real answer.
Are they strict constitutionalists or should the constitution be amended to stop hippie flag burners?

The Repubs have NO central philosophy. They have no overriding and clear goals. They'll say whatever they need to say to fold in any demographic they can, whether it be the racists, survivalists, religous fundamentalists or any other group that feels put down and ridiculed by them thar snooty collitch perfessors and other people that just think they know so much. The only common thread running thru all Republican constituencies is that they're base and vulgar people.

what has he said that is so stupid it's everything that is really HAPPENING?

sounds like you were describing Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.


30 years and two failures.

So, nothing to say to the 9 billion .... LOL

Still think I have inside sources with the US Gov.... or maybe a tinfoil hat ...

Want to see a copy of a report to Bush about Al-Quaeda.... in January 2001... He did fuck all ... Go find it... Maybe I will post it tomorrow ( 3 pages) so that you can wipe your smelly handicapped ass. :321GFY

Sharp retort Einstein.

I know you are, but what am I? Are you going to tell me I have cooties next?

yeah that balanced budget thing, peace in Ireland, the most prosperous and peaceful period in our ENTIRE NATIONAL HISTORY.

That Clinton, he sure was a fuckup.

the American people mean nothing to this adminstration!PERIOD! and thats what it's supposed to be all about!

That sounded like the transcripts of the pillow talk between Wild Bill and thong babe monica in the white house oval office.

"OH baby, Mr President, tell me how disgusting those republicans are. Ouch, the cigar hurts my pussy"

I can see you've exhausted your intellectual repertoire. I'll go play World of Warcraft now so you can masturbate thinking of your brilliant demolition of my ridiculous liberal ideas.

Your very apparent paranoia...Danny boy...probably stems from the illegal drugs that you use and probably other criminal activities you engage in. You should committ yourself to a clinic...but on second thought...I am satisfied that you would not benefit from treatment. Best to leave the slot open for someone that can be helped.

You are the definition of ignorance.

Ignorance - The condition of being ignorant; the want of knowledge in general, or in relation to a particular subject; the state of being uneducated or uninformed.

Digboy, you don't know me from adam. You post an article that claims that the left have no method of rebuttal and no outlet for liberal ideas that are not instantly squashed by the right. Instead of calling you a fag, or criticising your creativity, I went to a neutral source, pulled up actual facts and posted them. There are more anti-bush books than clinton ones. It is easier to find them. They sell better. This seems to be a disconnect between article's argument and the truth.

The end text of your linked article:
OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."
Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.
My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"
When those 38 people attack Clinton and his cock, who does the rebuttal?

My Answer was to post several dozen exhibit Bs with sales figures (amazon sales rank) easily found. How does this make me uncreative?

at least he wasn't at his ranch in texas

You really are not terribly bright...are you? The point was that your source of information is limited to the media...so when you and others make the claims that this or that is not reported in the American news media...it just is not true. You and the others use the American news media for most of your sources of news and provide links to same when it suits your agenda. When it does not suit your agenda then the collective you make the ridiculous claim that this or that was not reported and/or was not kept on the front page long enough to satisfy you...thus a cover up/brushing it under the table. You and others like you live to bash the US...and search and search for something that you think...ah ha...this surely will get those arrogant American assholes riled up...when most of what you and others post is either rehashed "news" or news from a less than credible resource. I have access to every major news outlet in the US as well as most of the world...although I do not read or watch outlets whose language I do not understand. I suspect the majority of Americans have this capability. Americans get the news and for the most part the unadulterated news...or have the ability to do so.

FYI...I think I am familiar with the report you are referring to and if I am correct...the President is the one that called for the report thus the title of the report.

Now go search some more...while giggling like a little school girl...girly man.

Sure Arnold, but you are wrong.

I am referring to a CIA Memo untitled : to Condi

see above post, there is 2 more pages.

What did he do? Nothing! True he dais he can't read more than a one page triple spaced memo....

Post it if you like but I probably have seen it before...and I am satisfied that it will not be of any import to me...even though I am satisfied that you will think that it is of import.

I suppose you have a point to make. Well make it.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Translation:

I suppose you have a point to make. Well make it. = I am a dumb fuck

No...a dumb fuck is one that posts a document that they apparently think is of import...but do not state what the point is that they are attempting to make by posting the document. I assume that I know what the point is...but then again...one should not make assumptions. BTW :321GFY girly man.

Don't be coy.

You know perfectly well it's a jpeg of the first page of the document you asked directfiesta to provide. In case you've forgotten:

"No al-Qaeda threat was turned over to the new administration."

---Condoleezza Rice March 22 in an op-ed piece for the Washington Post

would you like to see the pdfs of the whole document?

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB...47/clarke%20me
mo.pdf

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB...47/clarke%20at
tachment.pdf

I concur. there's too much lie and fabricated truth goin around anyway.

Its obvious to me Rich is one of the most intelligent people on this board. Why are you such a hateful fuck?

It is more than obvious to me that you and he think the same thing. I do not think he is intelligent...nor do I think that you are...if you believe Richy boy to be intelligent. It is possible that you think the ability to articulate and intelligence correlate and this is not necessarily true...as proven by Richy boy.

well said...
 

when the voters vote Republican they don't know what they are doing, but when they vote for a Democrat they have more credibility (intelligence and compassion)....

Sandy Berger the former Clinton Administration National Security Advisor, said he made a "mistake" and was just "sloppy" when an FBI investigation revealed that he had stolen Top Secret memos and documents from the National Archives relating to the events surrounding al-Qaida attacks on America during the 1990s and in the year 2000. Archive security notified the FBI when they discovered documents missing, and saw Berger stuffing papers into his pants, socks, and a leather briefcase





So, ultimately it comes down to whether you accept the Democrat's spin that Mr. Berger was just "sloppy" and "mistakenly" stuffed Top Secret documents relating to terrorism threats into his pants prior to the 9/11 Commission investigation, or whether you have at least a minimal grasp of the obvious. With that, you would have to conclude that Sandy Berger attempted to keep information about terrorism, and the previous administration's approach to it, from the American people and the 9/11 Commission.



I dont remember this being a big story, but it was in fact another felony from he clinton administration.

I cant understand how you can come to that assumption realizing that the democrats have been on wrong on foreign policy for at least 30 years in a row.

If your and Directfiesta's point is that The Secretary of State has been caught in a lie...

I have believed the new the Secretary of State to be a liar since shortly after 9/11...when she made the statement about no one ever thinking that a plane would be flown into a building.

Keep in mind that these documents are from the time period when the WTC attacks were being planned and set into motion.

hmmmmm..... wha???