![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Sick Fuck
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
|
next generations of email not spam friendly
Sadly, but needed, email traffic is gonna be 'reversed'. I.e. as you know the "remove me from list" today, a built in software on ISP mailservers will send back a reply where the sender has to confirm manually with a generated code in a small image (add me to your safelist). You already see this on website forms today. That means you have to have a valid email and use the same email to send again to get through the filters. The users can choose to use the filter or not, and instead of blocking senders, he can choose which emails to be on safelist. When signing up for emails on internet, he can provide a unique ID which the mailer can use (which will somehow be possible to integrate in scripts). This will helps him identify the sender, and remove the sender whenever he wants.
You can experience confirm kinda emails already, but this is far more advanced. Further, mass emailing will be filtered away, if you not registering on central databases. It will be the choice of the ISPs if they gonna use the databases or not. wow ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,966
|
Hum.. But opt-in will still be possible
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Sick Fuck
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,891
|
This will never fly. Nobody wants to do that extra step. Those form validation codes all over the place are a pain as it is.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 5,247
|
I dunno, spam watch seems to work okay. You only have to confirm once.
__________________
ICQ: 91139591 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Sick Fuck
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,227
|
if theres money to be made, it will be hacked.
__________________
if you need more than 3 clicks to get to a join page, something is wrong ;) p.s. i still bring the sales whores here. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: █◄►█
Posts: 3,558
|
Quote:
This would reduce work productivity, I dont see major companies supporting this, unlike can-spam. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |