North Korea admits it has nuclear weapons! - GoFuckYourself.com

Joe Citizen · 02-10-2005, 12:38 AM

BREAKING NEWS

North Korea says it will not participate in six-party nuclear talks and claims for first time it has nuclear weapons. Details soon.

www.cnn.com

Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

AdultMovies.bz · 02-10-2005, 12:53 AM

I dont think he gives a shit, there's nowhere near as much oil in North Korea as there is in the middle east

A to the J · 02-10-2005, 01:21 AM

it won't get handled, he wants the oil

Jinx · 02-10-2005, 01:27 AM

Rui · 02-10-2005, 03:12 AM

He will forget about it and move to another oil-country, and forget yet another bitchslap from Kimmy lol...

ADL Colin · 02-10-2005, 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen

Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

How will any of the other five nations that were commited to a nuclear-free North Korea handle it?

How will China handle it? Surrounded by nuclear powers; Russia to the North, India and Pakistan to the west and North Korea - if they can be trusted, to the east.

Joe Citizen · 02-10-2005, 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

How will any of the other five nations that were commited to a nuclear-free North Korea handle it?

How will China handle it? Surrounded by nuclear powers; Russia to the North, India and Pakistan to the west and North Korea - if they can be trusted, to the east.

More nuclear weapons = more diplomacy.

If you outlaw weapons of mass destruction only outlaws will have weapons of mass destruction.

ahaha

ADL Colin · 02-10-2005, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen

More nuclear weapons = more diplomacy.

If you outlaw weapons of mass destruction only outlaws will have weapons of mass destruction.

ahaha

Funny. I'm asking these questions to see where you are coming from ...

So do you disagree with the United Nations, the world community and the IAEA? Do you think the United Nations/IAEA should attempt to enforce its agreements? Why do you ask what Bush will do when it is agreements with the international community that are being violated? Do you think the international community is powerless and lacks the will to enforce them? Do you think it would be better to disband those organizations as ineffective?

blazin · 02-10-2005, 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A to the J

it won't get handled, he wants the oil

I can't see it happening either. His sights are set on Iran.

Nicky · 02-10-2005, 03:54 AM

Oh man, what a long shot, who could have known North Korea had nukes??

Joe Citizen · 02-10-2005, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

Do you think the international community is powerless and lacks the will to enforce them?

Why can't countries withdraw from international agreements? Why is it okay for the USA to have weapons of mass destruction for the purposes of defence but not other nations?

I see these nuclear non-proliferation agreements as one sided agreements that only serve the interests of the west. I don't blame them from withdrawing. The USA has shown itself to be a bloodthirsty aggressor and I understand their defesive posturing. Nations are sovereign entities. Why shouldn't they be entitled to utilize nuclear power or develop nuclear weapons as a deterrant to being attacked?

ADL Colin · 02-10-2005, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen

Why can't countries withdraw from international agreements? Why is it okay for the USA to have weapons of mass destruction for the purposes of defence but not other nations?

I see these nuclear non-proliferation agreements as one sided agreements that only serve the interests of the west. I don't blame them from withdrawing. The USA has shown itself to be a bloodthirsty aggressor and I understand their defesive posturing. Nations are sovereign entities. Why shouldn't they be entitled to utilize nuclear power or develop nuclear weapons as a deterrant to being attacked?

I've never seen you use such an argument to defend the US, only to criticize it. You could very well use such a belief to defend US policy. Why in all the years of reading your posts have I not seen such a thing? If the US is a sovereign nation does it have a right to torture its political prisoners held on its own soil? Do you have any problem whatsoever with its refusal to not ratify the Kyoto protocol?

You criticize US policy on damned near everything. With a few years as evidence I don't think you've ever said "The US is a sovereign country. It can do what it wants". Let's see. Drug laws and enforcement, education, law-making, politics? When have you used this argument to defend the US?

Joe Citizen · 02-10-2005, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

With a few years as evidence I don't think you've ever said "The US is a sovereign country. It can do what it wants".

Where did I say that any sovereign nation can do what it wants? Please don't put words into my mouth.

I'm saying that I don't think that it's unreasonable for a country to develop nuclear power as an alternative power source or nuclear weapons as a deterrant to attack. Especially when countries like Israel and the USA are entitled to have them. And Iran and North Korea are certainly under threat from attack by the USA. I understand their position. They want some leverage and I hope they get it.

theking · 02-10-2005, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

I've never seen you use such an argument to defend the US, only to criticize it. You could very well use such a belief to defend US policy. Why in all the years of reading your posts have I not seen such a thing? If the US is a sovereign nation does it have a right to torture its political prisoners held on its own soil? Do you have any problem whatsoever with its refusal to not ratify the Kyoto protocol?

You criticize US policy on damned near everything. With a few years as evidence I don't think you've ever said "The US is a sovereign country. It can do what it wants". Let's see. Drug laws and enforcement, education, law-making, politics? When have you used this argument to defend the US?

His American wife committed suicide because of him. He has deeply rooted pychological issues.

ADL Colin · 02-10-2005, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen

I'm saying that I don't think that it's unreasonable for a country to develop nuclear power as an alternative power source or nuclear weapons as a deterrant to attack. Especially when countries like Israel and the USA are entitled to have them. And Iran and North Korea are certainly under threat from attack by the USA. I understand their position. They want some leverage and I hope they get it.

I think it is unreasonable, Joe. I am opposed to all nuclear weapons myself. I don't think the US should have them either. I don't see where the strategy of letting all nations have them in the supposed interest of "self-defense" is a step in the right direction. It's a MAD world. I think "mutual assured destruction" will only lead to "mutual assured destruction".

ADL Colin · 02-10-2005, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

His American wife committed suicide because of him. He has deeply rooted pychological issues.

?????????

Joe Citizen · 02-10-2005, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

I think it is unreasonable, Joe. I am opposed to all nuclear weapons myself. I don't think the US should have them either.

In theory, I agree with you. I think the world would be a better place without nuclear weapons too but I don't think it's ever going to happen.

The cat's been out of the bag a little too long now, don't you think?

evanmorgan · 02-10-2005, 05:06 AM

Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

doesnt make sense to me?
Evn

NoComments · 02-10-2005, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen

BREAKING NEWS

North Korea says it will not participate in six-party nuclear talks and claims for first time it has nuclear weapons. Details soon.

www.cnn.com

Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

I have nuclear weapons too.

http://cotac.com/serge/

Odin88 · 02-10-2005, 05:24 AM

Glad to see Stalin's spirit is still living on hey Joe? You must be pretty proud of your communist friends in North Korea.

AdultMovies.bz · 02-10-2005, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan

Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

doesnt make sense to me?
Evn

Why in hell would he steal oil for the profit of his country if he can just jack the price up and control oil deposits for decades to come?

spacemonk · 02-10-2005, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultMovies.bz

Why in hell would he steal oil for the profit of his country if he can just jack the price up and control oil deposits for decades to come?

Some people just dont get it

nojob · 02-10-2005, 08:55 AM

we all knew that they had them, they just wouldn't admit it . If they are going to use them, they will.. We can not stop them.

QuaWee · 02-10-2005, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultMovies.bz

I dont think he gives a shit, there's nowhere near as much oil in North Korea as there is in the middle east

so so true

serguei · 02-10-2005, 09:01 AM

I think this is true... Why not....

BRISK · 02-10-2005, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan

Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

doesnt make sense to me?
Evn

You don't just go there and "get oil"

Oil doesn't just fall out of the ground

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 09:09 AM

N Korea can't reach the US with nukes. The US will use diplomacy to economically subjugate N Korea long before they CAN reach the US.
If the world doesn't go along with it, it really won't matter. Korea is a time bomb that will blow before they can reach the US with a warhead. If the other 5 countries can't defuse the bomb, so be it, they'll learn a good lesson.

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 09:12 AM

oh, and its amusing to see how the uneducated among us thing that war for oil is a bad thing.
try living without if for a month. you'll be dead, geek.

ColBigBalls · 02-10-2005, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen

BREAKING NEWS

North Korea says it will not participate in six-party nuclear talks and claims for first time it has nuclear weapons. Details soon.

www.cnn.com

Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

you mean he would attack someone who can fight back..?

e-god · 02-10-2005, 09:16 AM

ColBigBalls · 02-10-2005, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

oh, and its amusing to see how the uneducated among us thing that war for oil is a bad thing.
try living without if for a month. you'll be dead, geek.

there are many other forms of energy

Mojiteaux · 02-10-2005, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColBigBalls

you mean he would attack someone who can fight back..?

I think the US soldiers in Iraq have expererienced very well that even the poorly equipped resistance can fight back hard.

ColBigBalls · 02-10-2005, 09:41 AM

you know what i ment.

The Sultan Of Smut · 02-10-2005, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan

Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

Because Iraq's oil has been taken off the market. Attacking the country had something to do with that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

If the other 5 countries can't defuse the bomb, so be it, they'll learn a good lesson.

Absolutely true. The only problem I have is Bush's arguement that Iraq was a "grave and growin threat" when it wasn't and that the DPRK is.

Manowar · 02-10-2005, 09:44 AM

Prince Charles to marry Camilla Parker Bowles ?

groark · 02-10-2005, 09:45 AM

I think that NC is now the first real enemy of the USA.. Bush is wetting his pants because he is scared to death

Fun is starting!

milambur · 02-10-2005, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

N Korea can't reach the US with nukes. The US will use diplomacy to economically subjugate N Korea long before they CAN reach the US.
If the world doesn't go along with it, it really won't matter. Korea is a time bomb that will blow before they can reach the US with a warhead. If the other 5 countries can't defuse the bomb, so be it, they'll learn a good lesson.

Yes they can reach the US with nukes, the missile they fired over Japan a couple of years ago could hit Alaska and Hawaii with a nuke and it's widely considered among security experts that they have developed a missile that can strike the US west coast.

Rich · 02-10-2005, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milambur

Yes they can reach the US with nukes, the missile they fired over Japan a couple of years ago could hit Alaska and Hawaii with a nuke and it's widely considered among security experts that they have developed a missile that can strike the US west coast.

shh, just let 12dicks talk tough and remain ignorant. He wouldn't be funny if he knew anything.

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColBigBalls

there are many other forms of energy

sure there are kid, just nothing that can run the whole country.

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

shh, just let 12dicks talk tough and remain ignorant. He wouldn't be funny if he knew anything.

oh look, the idiot came out to play.

nico-t · 02-10-2005, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by groark

I think that NC is now the first real enemy of the USA.. Bush is wetting his pants because he is scared to death

Fun is starting!

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

Absolutely true. The only problem I have is Bush's arguement that Iraq was a "grave and growin threat" when it wasn't and that the DPRK is.

wrong. what did Bush name as the axis of evil? Iraq, Iran, N. Korea was it?
looks like he actually knew something, eh?

Iraq was a threat and our military was already there. easy choice.

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milambur

Yes they can reach the US with nukes, the missile they fired over Japan a couple of years ago could hit Alaska and Hawaii with a nuke and it's widely considered among security experts that they have developed a missile that can strike the US west coast.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...ub=CTVNewsAt11
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3531956.stm
http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=10053

I see "if" "could" "might" but if the world had a backbone, they could be starved into submission in months.
It's all about the world having no backbone.
Best thing that could happen is for them to fire an untested missile at us and it miss.
kentucky fried korea

Rich · 02-10-2005, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

wrong. what did Bush name as the axis of evil? Iraq, Iran, N. Korea was it?
looks like he actually knew something, eh?

Iraq was a threat and our military was already there. easy choice.

Good lord you really need to stop watching television. Seriously, 2 weeks without it and your mind will start functioning properly.

Rich · 02-10-2005, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...ub=CTVNewsAt11
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3531956.stm
http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=10053

I see "if" "could" "might" but if the world had a backbone, they could be starved into submission in months.
It's all about the world having no backbone.
Best thing that could happen is for them to fire an untested missile at us and it miss.
kentucky fried korea

haha, proved yourself wrong with a quick google search, rough. Nice backpedal though. You should really be a politician in a redneck state with a very, very stupid population. Not an insult, you'd win.

The Sultan Of Smut · 02-10-2005, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

wrong. what did Bush name as the axis of evil? Iraq, Iran, N. Korea was it?
looks like he actually knew something, eh?

Iraq was a threat and our military was already there. easy choice.

You missed my point. But anyway out of the 3 in Bush's "Axis of Evil" (muhahaha) which one do you thing deserved attention first? Out of the 3 Iraq was the weakest. Is that why they were attacked? Iraq - at the height of their power - couldn't defeat Iran in the 70s and 80s with the active support of the United States. So what makes them this "grave and growing" danger which Bush referred to? Could you clarify why Iraq posed a danger more tangible than the one the DPRK represents?

Rich · 02-10-2005, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

You missed my point. But anyway out of the 3 in Bush's "Axis of Evil" (muhahaha) which one do you thing deserved attention first? Out of the 3 Iraq was the weakest. Is that why they were attacked? Iraq - at the height of their power - couldn't defeat Iran in the 70s and 80s with the active support of the United States. So what makes them this "grave and growing" danger which Bush referred to? Could you clarify why Iraq posed a danger more tangible than the one the DPRK represents?

You're giving 12clicks waaaay too much credit. I don't even think he knows who the original WWII axis was.

sweetME · 02-10-2005, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx

This is so scary, I hope we or our children never see this.

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 12:50 PM

don't take this the wrong way but you're confused.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

You missed my point.

no I didn't. you chose not to like my answer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

But anyway out of the 3 in Bush's "Axis of Evil" (muhahaha) which one do you thing deserved attention first? Out of the 3 Iraq was the weakest. Is that why they were attacked?

No, they were attacked because we were still at a state of war with them, they weren't living up to their surrender agreement and the people you are currently at war with are ALWAYS far more dangerous then the people you're not at war with.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

Iraq - at the height of their power - couldn't defeat Iran in the 70s and 80s with the active support of the United States.

look up the word active. they sold arms to iraq.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

So what makes them this "grave and growing" danger which Bush referred to? Could you clarify why Iraq posed a danger more tangible than the one the DPRK represents?

I just did. but to expand on it so that even the idiots like Bich can understand, Our military, allies, and oil supply were all in danger for an iraq who, although having surrendered, was not disarming or abiding by the surrender agreement.

12clicks · 02-10-2005, 12:55 PM

you gotta love the argument the rabble brings to the table to refute what I say

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

shh, just let 12dicks talk tough and remain ignorant. He wouldn't be funny if he knew anything

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

Good lord you really need to stop watching television. Seriously, 2 weeks without it and your mind will start functioning properly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

haha, proved yourself wrong with a quick google search, rough. Nice backpedal though. You should really be a politician in a redneck state with a very, very stupid population. Not an insult, you'd win.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich

You're giving 12clicks waaaay too much credit. I don't even think he knows who the original WWII axis was.

I often wonder how boring (but more intelligent) this board would be if the idiots had any self awareness.

02-10-2005, 12:38 AM	#1
Joe Citizen Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 4,552	North Korea admits it has nuclear weapons! BREAKING NEWS North Korea says it will not participate in six-party nuclear talks and claims for first time it has nuclear weapons. Details soon. www.cnn.com Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

02-10-2005, 12:53 AM	#2
AdultMovies.bz Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Your Mum's House Posts: 1,036	I dont think he gives a shit, there's nowhere near as much oil in North Korea as there is in the middle east __________________ $8.35 High-Usage Adult Hosting: 510GB Storage + 5010GB Bandwidth + SQL + SSL + Free Domain With Whois Privacy. Use this Coupon Code for extra 25GB Storage Space when you join: 25freegb

02-10-2005, 01:21 AM	#3
A to the J Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Indy Posts: 47	it won't get handled, he wants the oil __________________ "Life's a journey not a destination"

02-10-2005, 01:27 AM	#4
Jinx Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 636	__________________ ICQ: 360-63-200

02-10-2005, 03:54 AM	#10
Nicky Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 30,070	Oh man, what a long shot, who could have known North Korea had nukes?? __________________ gfynicky @ gmail.com

02-10-2005, 03:12 AM	#5
Rui web Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: On icq: 85-483-060 Posts: 9,533	He will forget about it and move to another oil-country, and forget yet another bitchslap from Kimmy lol...

02-10-2005, 05:06 AM	#18
evanmorgan Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 2,490	Wankstains answer this If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil..... doesnt make sense to me? Evn

02-10-2005, 05:24 AM	#20
Odin88 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: au Posts: 3,267	Glad to see Stalin's spirit is still living on hey Joe? You must be pretty proud of your communist friends in North Korea.

02-10-2005, 08:55 AM	#23
nojob The Original NoJob Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Jerzzey Posts: 3,682	we all knew that they had them, they just wouldn't admit it . If they are going to use them, they will.. We can not stop them.

02-10-2005, 09:01 AM	#25
serguei Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hungary Posts: 802	I think this is true... Why not.... __________________ RevshareCash.com FREE HOSTED GALLERIES! 55% Payout! Unique content - Defloration, underwater nudity & naked gymnasts!

02-10-2005, 09:09 AM	#27
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,790	N Korea can't reach the US with nukes. The US will use diplomacy to economically subjugate N Korea long before they CAN reach the US. If the world doesn't go along with it, it really won't matter. Korea is a time bomb that will blow before they can reach the US with a warhead. If the other 5 countries can't defuse the bomb, so be it, they'll learn a good lesson. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

02-10-2005, 09:12 AM	#28
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,790	oh, and its amusing to see how the uneducated among us thing that war for oil is a bad thing. try living without if for a month. you'll be dead, geek. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

02-10-2005, 09:16 AM	#30
e-god Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: BabeLand Posts: 1,736	__________________

02-10-2005, 09:41 AM	#33
ColBigBalls Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 1,733	you know what i ment.

02-10-2005, 09:44 AM	#35
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	Prince Charles to marry Camilla Parker Bowles ?

02-10-2005, 09:45 AM	#36
groark So Fucking Banned Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Germany Posts: 1,966	I think that NC is now the first real enemy of the USA.. Bush is wetting his pants because he is scared to death Fun is starting!