GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why Can't Iran Have a Nuclear Weapon? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=427821)

woj 02-06-2005 07:52 PM

100 reasons why Iran can't have nuclear weapons...

bigang04 02-06-2005 07:58 PM

Thats Hot!

BigAng
http://curemyproblem.com

69pornlinks 02-06-2005 07:58 PM

because they say so....http://www.asbandeiras.hpg.ig.com.br/03asia/israel.JPG


:)

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-06-2005 08:08 PM

Fuck the nukes.
Fuck the oil.

America wants the women.

beergood 02-06-2005 08:17 PM

Because we said they can't have them. Thats why

FTVGirls 02-06-2005 08:18 PM

Hey Assneck, chee gofti? Harfet kharabeh.

Googooly 02-06-2005 08:19 PM

The only thing about persia is the Fucking shity Regim. They DONT let people have freedom, there is no freedom of speech. They can even get killed or jaild for life for just something simple wich is no crim in any other countries. Even with all those people still try to have as much fun as they can. I hope that regim fall so people in iran can have freedom!
so to end this:
Persian people are VERY NICE & COOL!
Persian Goverment/Regim is FUCKING SHIT, I HOPE THEY ALL DIE IN THE WORSE WAY!!

p.s If you can be botherd read the History of persia and YOU will love it!!

p.s.s Persian People Rules! ^_^

Googooly 02-06-2005 08:22 PM

OMG they are hot, I think I need to come to where you live mate!!

corvette 02-06-2005 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
I have a persian girls fetish now.

same here, got it a minute ago

goBigtime 02-06-2005 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaliboy2g
Good job dumbshit. Keep playing the race card.
Have you ever heard of crazy or unsafe.

Crazy or unsafe to who?

When has Iran been an agressor?

I've seen a fair load of "crazy" and "unsafe" over the past few years & it sure the fuck wasn't coming from Iran.

sonofsam 02-06-2005 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goBigtime
Crazy or unsafe to who?

When has Iran been an agressor?

I've seen a fair load of "crazy" and "unsafe" over the past few years & it sure the fuck wasn't coming from Iran.

exactly....

dcortez 02-06-2005 11:55 PM

In the Iran-Contra Affair, United States President Ronald Reagan's administration secretly sold arms to Iran, which was engaged in a bloody war with its neighbor Iraq from 1980 to 1988, and diverted the proceeds to the Contra rebels fighting to overthrow the leftist and allegedly democratically-elected Sandinista government of Nicaragua.

Those sales thus had a dual goal: appeasing Iran, which had influence with militant groups that held several American hostages in Lebanon and supported bombings in Western European countries, and funding a guerrilla war aimed at aborting Nicaraguan independence from US hegemony.

Both transactions were contrary to acts of Congress, which prohibited the funding of the Contras and the sale of weapons to Iran. In addition, both activities violated UN sanctions.

I guess the love affair (with Iran) is officially over now.

The usa also supported Iraq before it became an 'official' enemy.

Why arm these nations if you're going to go to war with them afterwards? Arms dealers make fortunes (at the expense of taxpayers and civillian lives) from these fair weather friend foreign policies.

It sure is a good thing that the us executive has no ties to any arms dealers or one might get suspicious...

-Dino

Lykos 02-07-2005 02:14 AM

Persian girls are very beautifull!
And i think that non of countries in world shouldn't have nuck wepons...

DWB 02-07-2005 02:16 AM

I would fuck EVERY girl in this thread, mask or not, with no rubber. These brauds are HOT HOT HOT!!! I fell in love 3 times already.

Praise Allah !!!!!

nico-t 02-07-2005 05:47 AM

well i dont really dig the persian girls... they look to much like turkish girls to me and around here the turkish girls yell and act like guys, at least the ones who have been 'westerned'... give me the white and the asian hotties and im fine :)

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googooly
p.s If you can be botherd read the History of persia and YOU will love it!!

p.s.s Persian People Rules! ^_^

I've only read the Greek's version of Persian history. That's quite limiting. Are you aware of any good English translations of ancient Persian accounts?

Nathan 02-07-2005 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
So ...

The US occupied Iraq's capital city in 21 days and has occupied the entire country for nearly two years with less than 2000 casualties. That's pretty historic. Iraq fought Iran to a standoff for ten whole years. Some of you think Iran/US would be a fight?

How is it difficult to fight an army that did not really want to fight and on top of that was under blockade for 10+ years?? And on top of that were bomb to the stoneage in most parts 10 years ago also.

Seriously, there is nothing historic about that.

And yes, Iran/US _WILL_ be much much more of a fight if the US is actually stupid enough to invade.

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcortez
Why arm these nations if you're going to go to war with them afterwards?

Why did Athens fight Sparta after their alliance against the Persians? Why did the Italians switch sides in World War I? Why did the USSR and USA stare each other down in the Cold War after fighting together in World War II?

What did Thucydides say? "Honor, fear and interest". Has human nature changed?

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan
How is it difficult to fight an army that did not really want to fight and on top of that was under blockade for 10+ years?? And on top of that were bomb to the stoneage in most parts 10 years ago also.

Seriously, there is nothing historic about that.

And yes, Iran/US _WILL_ be much much more of a fight if the US is actually stupid enough to invade.

Name one other military in history that travelled as far in 21 days as the US military did. What about the planning and the logistics that made that possible? It's absolutely historic. It's up there with the World War II German invasion of Yugoslavia.

You're right. The US did bomb Iraq into the stone age 10 years ago. That ground war lasted 3 days. Remember the claims of the pundits that the US couldn't fight a war in the desert against battle-hardened troops?

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 06:24 AM

Would Iran even put their air force in their air? Can they fight a war against an opponent with high altitude planes beaming signals back to M1A1's as to the location of every ground vehicle in the field? Basically an XBox shootout for US tank commanders.

kenny 02-07-2005 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan
And yes, Iran/US _WILL_ be much much more of a fight if the US is actually stupid enough to invade.


I think it would be even less off a fight. It would be a different type of war.

They wouldn't be establishing a new government they would be setting back Iran's infrastructure to the point where they comply.

The first thing to go would be Iran's communications through US air surperiority. After that taking out key military defense and strategic supply/infrastructure targets.

They wouldn't be using marines for police officers like they are doing in Iraq.

About the only thing Iran would be able to do is attack Iraq as a indirect attempt to set back the US.

kenny 02-07-2005 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
Would Iran even put their air force in their air? Can they fight a war against an opponent with high altitude planes beaming signals back to M1A1's as to the location of every ground vehicle in the field? Basically an XBox shootout for US tank commanders.


The US would gain air surperiority in a matter of days.

You can't hit what you can't see.

Drake 02-07-2005 06:41 AM

So that's what Persian girls look like. Hot.

kenny 02-07-2005 06:41 AM

The US has $2 billion dollar stealth bombers that can carry as many laser guided weapons as 75 of the jets used in Iraq.

They didn't even have to use it during the Iraq war because there was no need to risk such a plane.

They also have conventional bombs several times as potent as the one used in Iraq.. again there was no need to use them.


This is only a couple examples across a array of technological surperior aspects that are worth mentioning.

With that I will add that I don't think it would ever come down to a war with Iran. Diplomacy is still in its infancy in regards to the situation with them.

Rhino22 02-07-2005 10:39 AM

hHly moly christy! This thread is hot

beergood 02-07-2005 10:42 AM

You assfucks need to shut it about the US being not able to handle Iran like a redheaded stepchild. They wouldn't stand a chance.

Persius 02-07-2005 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beergood
You assfucks need to shut it about the US being not able to handle Iran like a redheaded stepchild. They wouldn't stand a chance.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

clubchics 02-07-2005 04:44 PM

because the US hates competition

sonofsam 02-07-2005 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clubchics
because the US hates competition

cha-ching

theking 02-07-2005 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
Name one other military in history that travelled as far in 21 days as the US military did. What about the planning and the logistics that made that possible? It's absolutely historic. It's up there with the World War II German invasion of Yugoslavia.

You're right. The US did bomb Iraq into the stone age 10 years ago. That ground war lasted 3 days. Remember the claims of the pundits that the US couldn't fight a war in the desert against battle-hardened troops?

You are correct on all points...NATHAN is not.

theking 02-07-2005 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
Why did Athens fight Sparta after their alliance against the Persians? Why did the Italians switch sides in World War I? Why did the USSR and USA stare each other down in the Cold War after fighting together in World War II?

What did Thucydides say? "Honor, fear and interest". Has human nature changed?

You are correct...changing alliances is nothing new.

theking 02-07-2005 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny
I think it would be even less off a fight. It would be a different type of war.

They wouldn't be establishing a new government they would be setting back Iran's infrastructure to the point where they comply.

The first thing to go would be Iran's communications through US air surperiority. After that taking out key military defense and strategic supply/infrastructure targets.

They wouldn't be using marines for police officers like they are doing in Iraq.

About the only thing Iran would be able to do is attack Iraq as a indirect attempt to set back the US.

You are correct...NATHAN is not.

theking 02-07-2005 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny
The US would gain air surperiority in a matter of days.

You can't hit what you can't see.

You are correct...no contest.

theking 02-07-2005 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beergood
You assfucks need to shut it about the US being not able to handle Iran like a redheaded stepchild. They wouldn't stand a chance.

You are correct...not contest.

theking 02-07-2005 06:16 PM

In response to the thread title...have you not heard of non-proliferation...which many nations of the world have signed the treaty?

Sami 02-07-2005 06:17 PM

akhavi..... oona kheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeli kosan :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123