![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 643
|
![]() Court Upholds Bestiality Sentence
Jan 29, 2005 8:06 am US/Eastern LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) The videotapes do not lie, the Nebraska Supreme Court said Friday in upholding an exotic dancer's conviction and sentence for performing sex acts with a dog. The court unanimously rejected the appeal of Romona Anglemyer, a 32-year-old woman who had worked at the now defunct Mataya's Babydolls club. She argued that videotapes confiscated by police at the club showing several people, including Anglemyer, performing sex acts with animals should not have been entered into evidence at her trial. But the high court said the content of the tapes, together with information seized by police during the investigation, warranted their admittance and basis for the conviction. Anglemyer did not contest that the activity shown on the videotapes constituted indecency with an animal, a misdemeanor. What she had argued was that the tapes should not have been admitted without the testimony of a witness who actually saw the events depicted and could testify to the tapes' accuracy. Even without an eyewitness, photographic evidence can stand on its own to justify its admission at trial, the high court said in rejecting her argument. The tape in question had a date stamp and the hotel room in which it was taken was identified by police, the court said. Additionally, there was no evidence to raise doubts about the tape's validity, the court said. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: L A
Posts: 1,631
|
dog gone wrong
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |