Do u feel better about Iraq now? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

BRISK · 01-31-2005, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne

Isn't the US the most benevolent country in the world?

On a per-capita basis, I doubt it.

Damian_Maxcash · 01-31-2005, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK

On a per-capita basis, I doubt it.

On a per state basis I doubt it......!!

Stop reading your own press, Im not anti US or EVEN anti Bush.... but sometimes you have to read between the lines

directfiesta · 01-31-2005, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by project_naughty

You're an idiot, I'll give you that.

Dead civilians = about 8000-12000, mostly killed by the "insurgents" (Islamists and Socialists funded in the most part by Iran and Syria).

..
You actually WANT democracy to fail in Iraq, because you are a village idiot.

Alert !!!! Parrot at work !!!!

So please post a link or article backing up your claim ( propaganda ) that " civilians mostly killed by insurgents" ....
If you can't, then you are the idiot of the world.... and stop the weak name calling

Quote:

29/01/2005 - 14:10:51

More Iraqi civilians may have been killed by coalition forces and their allies than by insurgents, according to Iraqi government figures.

The figures, which have been compiled by Iraq?s Ministry of Health, will be disclosed on the BBC?s Panorama programme tomorrow.

They show coalition troops and Iraqi security forces were responsible for 60% of Iraqi civilian deaths in conflict-related violence in a six month period.

A total of 2,041 civilians were killed and a further 8,542 are believed to have been wounded by them between July 2004 and January 2005.

This compares with 1,233 killed and 4,115 wounded by insurgents.

The data comes from conflict-related civilian deaths and injuries recorded by Iraqi public hospitals.
It does not include the deaths of insurgents where they are known.

http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/stor...76&p=y3xx87z7z

DomBuyer · 01-31-2005, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by project_naughty

Dead civilians = about 8000-12000, mostly killed by the "insurgents" (Islamists and Socialists funded in the most part by Iran and Syria).

Utter nonsense.

A famous study by Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore found that more than 100,000 civilians have been killed and "They attributed many of those deaths to attacks by coalition forces mostly airstrikes and most of those killed were women and children. The risk of violent death was 58 times higher than before the war, the researchers reported.
.
"The fact that more than half of the deaths caused by the occupation forces were women and children is a cause for concern," the authors wrote.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/10/28/news/toll.html

Luc · 01-31-2005, 07:16 AM

The election was a total waste of fucking time.

Even CNN admitted that most of the voters didn't know who they were
voting for because they had to protect the names of the officials so they
don't get assasinated.

Ok, so you go in the voting booth and vote for.. whoever the fuck... What's
the point of that?

Than again, who cares right? All the elected officials will be Bush's puppets
and it doesn't matter who the people voted for, as long as they feel like
they've made a difference (which they haven't).

Peace

directfiesta · 01-31-2005, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by project_naughty

You're an idiot, I'll give you that.

A direct effect of the Iraq War was that Colonel Gadaffi of Libya shat his pants and decided to "play ball".

You actually WANT democracy to fail in Iraq, because you are a village idiot.

One word in Lybia's case : OIL !!!!!! ( with the US, it is always OIL ! )

Quote:

US oil companies have been awarded most of the contracts on offer at the first open licence auction in Libya.

European oil and gas companies were not awarded any of the licences to explore 127,000 sq km (51,000 sq miles).

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4219623.stm

Next time you start blabbing your mouth, check your facts: you will look less of an idiot, as you are so fast to call people.

project_naughty · 01-31-2005, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Alert !!!! Parrot at work !!!!

So please post a link or article backing up your claim ( propaganda ) that " civilians mostly killed by insurgents" ....
If you can't, then you are the idiot of the world.... and stop the weak name calling

Ok fucko.

This site is run by moonbats like yourself and therefore shows a pessimistic view of the numbers http://www.iraqbodycount.net/

project_naughty · 01-31-2005, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DomBuyer

Utter nonsense.

A famous study by Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore found that more than 100,000 civilians have been killed and "They attributed many of those deaths to attacks by coalition forces mostly airstrikes and most of those killed were women and children. The risk of violent death was 58 times higher than before the war, the researchers reported.
.
"The fact that more than half of the deaths caused by the occupation forces were women and children is a cause for concern," the authors wrote.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/10/28/news/toll.html

Your intelligence pails into significance when compared with that of your rival, Taboo.

That report was simply intended as a nail into George Bush's re-election coffin. It didn't work, because only a minority of idiots believed it. You included.

Like I said above, the moonbats' over-inflated estimations are currently 15563 so that figure of 100,000 would simply be wishful thinking from someone who does not want the Iraqis to enjoy democracy.

FunForOne · 01-31-2005, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by project_naughty

Your intelligence pails into significance when compared with that of your rival, Taboo.

That report was simply intended as a nail into George Bush's re-election coffin. It didn't work, because only a minority of idiots believed it. You included.

Like I said above, the moonbats' over-inflated estimations are currently 15563 so that figure of 100,000 would simply be wishful thinking from someone who does not want the Iraqis to enjoy democracy.

Your right, its wishful thinking from a political party that will publically pray for peace in a region and privately giggle when a US soldier is reported dead. Their hopes are to install masive social programs that keep a barrier between the classes, making them a "social elite" class.

Journalists are traditionally liberals because they believe themselves to be highly educated people who attain socially elite status through their education. At least the ones who understand why they are liberal. Most have been brainwashed by older journalistic liberals in college.

When You have money, the next thing you want is power and respect.

directfiesta · 01-31-2005, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by project_naughty

Ok fucko.

This site is run by moonbats like yourself and therefore shows a pessimistic view of the numbers http://www.iraqbodycount.net/

weak ...

Nothing to repeat, parrot ????

Turn on FoxNews, maybe they will implant a few sentences for you ...

ADL Colin · 01-31-2005, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

One word in Lybia's case : OIL !!!!!! ( with the US, it is always OIL ! )

Huh? Haiti, Grenada, Lebanon, Vietnam, Korea, Bosnia, Somalia, Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador.

What does the word "always" mean to you?

Odin88 · 01-31-2005, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK

On a per-capita basis, I doubt it.

You'd be correct, Canada is.

Boobies · 01-31-2005, 06:31 PM

NO,no,no
Saddam still alive...

http://www.highendcreatives.com

theking · 01-31-2005, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin

Huh? Haiti, Grenada, Lebanon, Vietnam, Korea, Bosnia, Somalia, Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador.

What does the word "always" mean to you?

Actually you left out a few...Columbia is one but there are others.

wargames · 02-01-2005, 02:13 AM

Iraq is a God-forsaken country.

BRISK · 02-01-2005, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Odin88

You'd be correct, Canada is.

Canada ranks high, but I don't think it would be the most benevolent country in the world either.

If I had to guess, I'd probably say a European country might take that title

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/eco_eco_aid_don_cap

Although, I don't think it should be considered a contest. Any benevolent act is good and should be appreciated.

ADL Colin · 02-01-2005, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Actually you left out a few...Columbia is one but there are others.

The first ten that came to mind.

baddog · 02-01-2005, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PenisFace

Hahaha, no.

why not?

01-31-2005, 06:31 PM	#63
Boobies Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 135	NO,no,no Saddam still alive... http://www.highendcreatives.com Last edited by Boobies; 01-31-2005 at 06:32 PM..

02-01-2005, 02:13 AM	#65
wargames Kliris Join Date: May 2003 Location: ca Posts: 10,423	Iraq is a God-forsaken country. __________________ ICQ 212-115-582 Email Steve at Vas Media Group .com

01-31-2005, 07:16 AM	#55
Luc Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Houston Posts: 1,130	The election was a total waste of fucking time. Even CNN admitted that most of the voters didn't know who they were voting for because they had to protect the names of the officials so they don't get assasinated. Ok, so you go in the voting booth and vote for.. whoever the fuck... What's the point of that? Than again, who cares right? All the elected officials will be Bush's puppets and it doesn't matter who the people voted for, as long as they feel like they've made a difference (which they haven't). Peace