File Sharing Case Before Supreme Court

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Greg B
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jul 2001
    • 7014

    #1

    File Sharing Case Before Supreme Court

    Briefs filed at Supreme Court in file-sharing case
    Internet case pits artists against civil libertarians
    Tuesday, January 25, 2005 Posted: 4:39 PM EST (2139 GMT)


    WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former Bush administration Supreme Court lawyer Theodore Olson has lined up with Hollywood in a big stakes fight over Internet file sharing.

    Olson represented President Bush in the 2000 Bush v. Gore case at the high court and was solicitor general until last summer when he returned to private practice in Washington.

    Now he's at the Supreme Court again, this time on the side of artists including Jimmy Buffett, Sheryl Crow, the Dixie Chicks, the Eagles, Reba McEntire, Avril Lavigne and Kenny Rogers.

    About 20 briefs were filed this week at the court supporting recording companies and movie studios that are trying to stop online distribution of copyrighted works. Justices hear arguments March 29 in the case that will decide if file-sharing services are responsible when their customers illegally swap songs and movies.

    "The world is watching to see whether we really mean what we say when we promise protection to innovation and the creative process," Olson, who filed arguments on behalf of the Defenders of Property Rights, said Tuesday at a news conference.

    On the other side are civil libertarians and consumer groups who contend that a defeat for Grokster Ltd. and StreamCast Networks Inc. could force technology companies to delay or block innovative products that give consumers more control.

    The case is Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster, 04-480.
  • Manowar
    jellyfish  
    • Dec 2003
    • 71528

    #2
    This will be a very interesting case

    Comment

    • Greg B
      So Fucking Banned
      • Jul 2001
      • 7014

      #3
      Manowar, I agree.

      Yet I can see the forest for the trees in that the file sharing service can't be held responsible fully for what people share. It's like trying to blame the phone company because some asschew decided to use a phone to threaten somebody. All they're doing is providing a service/procedure. What the user does with it is his or her own responsibility. The service can put in a warning in their TOS not to share certain files and perhaps even put in some form of filter. Yet in the long run a service is a service.

      I'm quite sure the Supreme Court will see this and rule quickly.

      Comment

      • Manowar
        jellyfish  
        • Dec 2003
        • 71528

        #4
        Originally posted by Greg B
        Manowar, I agree.

        Yet I can see the forest for the trees in that the file sharing service can't be held responsible fully for what people share. It's like trying to blame the phone company because some asschew decided to use a phone to threaten somebody. All they're doing is providing a service/procedure. What the user does with it is his or her own responsibility. The service can put in a warning in their TOS not to share certain files and perhaps even put in some form of filter. Yet in the long run a service is a service.

        I'm quite sure the Supreme Court will see this and rule quickly.
        Hopefully, but I can see the broadcast company reps pushing the whole "you dont try and stop users sharing illegal files", "you need to implement methods to stop" argument.

        Hopefully the court will see sense

        Comment

        • Veterans Day
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2003
          • 8403

          #5
          your example of the phone is not credible whatsoever, the phone provides many legit legal purposes, name 1 legal purpose a file sharing service provides.
          Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated

          Comment

          • TheJimmy
            ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
            • Jan 2001
            • 10747

            #6
            Originally posted by Veterans Day
            your example of the phone is not credible whatsoever, the phone provides many legit legal purposes, name 1 legal purpose a file sharing service provides.
            1) if I were a musician maybe I'd like to share my mp3s to get some fan base and distribute over a number of p2p networks

            2) if I had written a lot of useful ebooks and wanted to get them out cheaply

            3) if I were a programmer and had written a very useful tool and wanted to give it away, but didn't feel like hosting the file for download on my server


            there's 3...enjoy
            Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.

            Comment

            • Der Schleicher
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2005
              • 1189

              #7
              Justice delyed is justice denied. who justice it is anyway?
              Teeny Teen Girls - One of the best free pictures and videos online.
              WEBMASTER - We offer free hosting and dream submitter sign up now!

              Comment

              • cherrylula
                lol
                • Jan 2002
                • 15969

                #8
                Originally posted by Veterans Day
                your example of the phone is not credible whatsoever, the phone provides many legit legal purposes, name 1 legal purpose a file sharing service provides.

                i know hundreds of bands that use file sharing programs to get their name out and it works very effectively.

                Comment

                • beemk
                  CLICK HERE
                  • Jan 2002
                  • 20829

                  #9
                  Originally posted by cherrylula
                  i know hundreds of bands that use file sharing programs to get their name out and it works very effectively.
                  what she said
                  I host with Vacares

                  Comment

                  • brand0n
                    been very busy
                    • Nov 2002
                    • 26983

                    #10
                    should be good. was a matter of time before another one hit the high courts
                    want to buy this spot for cheap? it is of course for sale. long term deals are always the best bet. brand0n/ at/ a o l dot commies.

                    Comment

                    • ztik
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2001
                      • 5196

                      #11
                      Originally posted by cherrylula
                      i know hundreds of bands that use file sharing programs to get their name out and it works very effectively.

                      There is hundreds and even thousands of amatuer techno dj's who put their music out on them
                      .

                      Comment

                      Working...