Why Bush?s Agenda Is Immoral and an Abomination to God - GoFuckYourself.com

messiah1 · 01-20-2005, 08:04 PM

By Katherine Yurica

January 19, 2005

?He that hath an ear,
let him hear
what the spirit saith to the churches.?
Revelations 2:29

Daniel Belteshazzar (D.B.) served as an advisor in three administrations, though his service was extremely brief in his last governmental position where he was called upon to read the handwriting on the wall.

It was one of those inexplicable moments: The words had appeared suddenly upon the plaster of the wall opposite to where the head of state sat during his huge celebration party.

First a hand appeared, apparition-like, and then the hand wrote the words that stunned the great hall. The celebrating ceased. The leader?s face blanched. (It was almost like the inauguration balls for a U.S. president, where enormous funds are spent to reward the war lords and corporate ?lords? and ?ladies,? and the priests and religious leaders, who together form the power base of a Republican regime and make up the class of nobles who rule commerce and civilian behavior, and hence the nation.)

The inscription read, ?Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin,? which literally meant, ?numbered, numbered, weighed, divisions.?[1]

Our man, D.B. was called in to provide an intelligence analysis to the leader after his closest advisers, including the equivalent of the CIA and chief of intelligence, admitted their inability to fathom the meaning.

Then D.B. stepped up to the plate and told the head of state the following:

Mene, signifies that God has numbered your government and finished it.

Tekel, signifies that you are weighed in the balance and you are found wanting.

Peres, [singular form, same root as upharsin],[2] signifies that your government is divided and given to another.[3]

That night the leader?s government fell. A new head of state took the oath of office and instituted a new government.

George W. Bush, his administration, the Republican controlled congress as well as the Republican Party itself, and most of the churches in America (including evangelical, Southern Baptist, Pentecostal and Roman Catholic), stand indicted?not by men?not by this writer?but by the very Holy Scriptures the religious-right and Mr. Bush profess to uphold.

Weighed against the Bible, the Bush actions are not only morally corrupt?they are unchristian and unbiblical to the core.

In this essay, the Bush agenda is weighed on the scale of God?s standards and it is found wanting.

In the Beginning

In the year 2000, George W. Bush filed an entirely specious complaint requesting an injunction against ballots being counted in Florida in the presidential election. Five Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States issued an emergency order halting all counting of ballots as Mr. Bush?s lead perilously dropped to only 154 votes. The Court issued its order, having found Mr. Bush would suffer ?irreparable harm? if the counting proceeded. What was the ?irreparable harm?? Mr. Bush would have lost the election if all the votes were counted. Thus five Justices effectively handed Mr. Bush the presidency of the United States.

The American churches did not rise up as one, denouncing the wickedness of the arbitrary[4] court decision. Instead, the churches either remained silent or they applauded the decision. Comments from the pulpits of America rang out with, ?God intervened through the Supreme Court to take the election out of the hands of the majority to place God?s man?George W. Bush?in the White House!? It?s the first time I have heard God accused of being a conniver. (Amazingly the churches were blind to the blasphemous nature of their pronouncements.)

Yet the statement was met with ?Amens? and applause, which shows either the degree of ignorance or the moral degeneracy of the congregations or both!

The situation so closely resembles an event recorded in the Bible I was stunned by what I read. The churches need to recall an ancient ?election??the first of its kind in Israel?s history, which dramatically reveals God?s dedication to the concept of free-will as expressed in the people?s choice. Had God been inclined to set aside public opinion and the preference of the people for a king, Saul would not have been ?chosen by the people? to replace God?s man, Samuel.[5]

The significant thing about Samuel?s defeat is that it marked the end of a highly advanced if decentralized system of jurisprudence in Israel, where learned men sat as judges and interpreted and enunciated the laws of the nation. Samuel?s defeat marked a landmark change in Israel; it ended the rule of law, which was replaced by the spurious rule of men to the utter peril of the people.

As we shall see, the ascension of George W. Bush to the seat of power in America has brought its own challenge to the American system of jurisprudence.

Samuel?s disappointment was evident and God responded with words that are applicable to the churches today. Addressing Samuel, God said:

?They have not rejected you?they have rejected Me that I should not be King over them.? (1 Samuel 8:7 Amplified Version.)

Like the people living in Samuel?s time, this essay will reveal that the churches of America today have rejected the words of God in the Bible to follow and idolatrize sinners.

We must not forget that the people who chose Saul over Samuel paid a terrible price. It?s worth a review of the scriptures to read the warning Samuel delivered to the people. It makes one feel as if we are reliving a page in ancient history. God instructed Samuel to warn the people of exactly what would happen to them if they insisted on choosing the handsome, charming Saul[6] over God?s man. The biblical passage paraphrased says:

READ MORE?
http://yuricareport.com/Religion/The...yChurches.html

Shoehorn! · 01-20-2005, 08:08 PM

I doubt anyone on this board is going to read more than 3 words of that.

messiah1 · 01-20-2005, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn

I doubt anyone on this board is going to read more than 3 words of that.

But it's a good read, so i had to post it.

directfiesta · 01-20-2005, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn

I doubt anyone on this board is going to read more than 3 words of that.

LOL ....

swoop · 01-20-2005, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn

I doubt anyone on this board is going to read more than 3 words of that.

Wasn't even that many...

01-20-2005, 08:04 PM	#1
messiah1 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 549	Why Bush?s Agenda Is Immoral and an Abomination to God By Katherine Yurica January 19, 2005 ?He that hath an ear, let him hear what the spirit saith to the churches.? Revelations 2:29 Daniel Belteshazzar (D.B.) served as an advisor in three administrations, though his service was extremely brief in his last governmental position where he was called upon to read the handwriting on the wall. It was one of those inexplicable moments: The words had appeared suddenly upon the plaster of the wall opposite to where the head of state sat during his huge celebration party. First a hand appeared, apparition-like, and then the hand wrote the words that stunned the great hall. The celebrating ceased. The leader?s face blanched. (It was almost like the inauguration balls for a U.S. president, where enormous funds are spent to reward the war lords and corporate ?lords? and ?ladies,? and the priests and religious leaders, who together form the power base of a Republican regime and make up the class of nobles who rule commerce and civilian behavior, and hence the nation.) The inscription read, ?Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin,? which literally meant, ?numbered, numbered, weighed, divisions.?[1] Our man, D.B. was called in to provide an intelligence analysis to the leader after his closest advisers, including the equivalent of the CIA and chief of intelligence, admitted their inability to fathom the meaning. Then D.B. stepped up to the plate and told the head of state the following: Mene, signifies that God has numbered your government and finished it. Tekel, signifies that you are weighed in the balance and you are found wanting. Peres, [singular form, same root as upharsin],[2] signifies that your government is divided and given to another.[3] That night the leader?s government fell. A new head of state took the oath of office and instituted a new government. George W. Bush, his administration, the Republican controlled congress as well as the Republican Party itself, and most of the churches in America (including evangelical, Southern Baptist, Pentecostal and Roman Catholic), stand indicted?not by men?not by this writer?but by the very Holy Scriptures the religious-right and Mr. Bush profess to uphold. Weighed against the Bible, the Bush actions are not only morally corrupt?they are unchristian and unbiblical to the core. In this essay, the Bush agenda is weighed on the scale of God?s standards and it is found wanting. In the Beginning In the year 2000, George W. Bush filed an entirely specious complaint requesting an injunction against ballots being counted in Florida in the presidential election. Five Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States issued an emergency order halting all counting of ballots as Mr. Bush?s lead perilously dropped to only 154 votes. The Court issued its order, having found Mr. Bush would suffer ?irreparable harm? if the counting proceeded. What was the ?irreparable harm?? Mr. Bush would have lost the election if all the votes were counted. Thus five Justices effectively handed Mr. Bush the presidency of the United States. The American churches did not rise up as one, denouncing the wickedness of the arbitrary[4] court decision. Instead, the churches either remained silent or they applauded the decision. Comments from the pulpits of America rang out with, ?God intervened through the Supreme Court to take the election out of the hands of the majority to place God?s man?George W. Bush?in the White House!? It?s the first time I have heard God accused of being a conniver. (Amazingly the churches were blind to the blasphemous nature of their pronouncements.) Yet the statement was met with ?Amens? and applause, which shows either the degree of ignorance or the moral degeneracy of the congregations or both! The situation so closely resembles an event recorded in the Bible I was stunned by what I read. The churches need to recall an ancient ?election??the first of its kind in Israel?s history, which dramatically reveals God?s dedication to the concept of free-will as expressed in the people?s choice. Had God been inclined to set aside public opinion and the preference of the people for a king, Saul would not have been ?chosen by the people? to replace God?s man, Samuel.[5] The significant thing about Samuel?s defeat is that it marked the end of a highly advanced if decentralized system of jurisprudence in Israel, where learned men sat as judges and interpreted and enunciated the laws of the nation. Samuel?s defeat marked a landmark change in Israel; it ended the rule of law, which was replaced by the spurious rule of men to the utter peril of the people. As we shall see, the ascension of George W. Bush to the seat of power in America has brought its own challenge to the American system of jurisprudence. Samuel?s disappointment was evident and God responded with words that are applicable to the churches today. Addressing Samuel, God said: ?They have not rejected you?they have rejected Me that I should not be King over them.? (1 Samuel 8:7 Amplified Version.) Like the people living in Samuel?s time, this essay will reveal that the churches of America today have rejected the words of God in the Bible to follow and idolatrize sinners. We must not forget that the people who chose Saul over Samuel paid a terrible price. It?s worth a review of the scriptures to read the warning Samuel delivered to the people. It makes one feel as if we are reliving a page in ancient history. God instructed Samuel to warn the people of exactly what would happen to them if they insisted on choosing the handsome, charming Saul[6] over God?s man. The biblical passage paraphrased says: READ MORE? http://yuricareport.com/Religion/The...yChurches.html

01-20-2005, 08:08 PM	#2
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	I doubt anyone on this board is going to read more than 3 words of that. __________________