Our designer just gave me the finished design files for this site. I think its great. What do you say?
ReneePerez.com
ReneePerez.com
-
Cookie Cutter looks like its from 1999 -
let's party like it's 19991Comment
-
not a fan... not a fan at all...
Comment
-
Any other haters? I like it.Comment
-
Originally posted by ContentProducer
Why post it on gfy asking for opinions if you are going to call anyone who doesnt like it a hater?
Learn to take some constructive criticism and you may do better in this industry
Just my 2 centsComment
-
She is cute, but it does look like a lot of other sites out there, no personality
I want what every other man wants, I just want it more.Comment
-
I don't think he would mind some constructive criticism...yet you never offered any. How constructive is this..."Cookie Cutter looks like its from 1999"? That's not fucking constructive criticism asswipe! Constructive criticism is telling him how he could improve it - make it better - make it more appealing. If you don't like being called a hater...then keep you fucking mouth shut. Any questions hater?Originally posted by JulianSosa
Comment
-
Exactly what I was thinking. It makes no sense to design solo a girl like a rip off site. I couldn't blow up any images and the airbrushing is ridiculous. Keep it simple like nikki and tiffany. Too much makeup on these girls ages them four or five years.Originally posted by JulianSosa
Sig FreeComment
-
have your designer drop the bevelsComment
-
OK all I'll say about the haters is. How many fuckign design can you come up with. everyhting "Looks like 1999" or "Looks cookie cutter" sorry there are only so many ways you and design something. I mean what can one add to a new site that I have not seen before. Somebody please show me. Also is the "new" addition a benefit to the surfer? Last time I checked surfers cared about the CONTENT of a site not how pretty or cool it looks.Comment
-
bevels are the work of baelzebub!!
A little busy and over the top IMHO, but what the fuck do I know.Comment
-
The site looks really nice, though I do agree that there are tons of sites with this same general look.
I personally feel it's a mistake to make a site that is basically a few tour pages, and that one would do better to give some sample content that doesn't detract from actual signups. For example, maybe a dozen thumbnails in skimpy clothing, with blowups, but leaving the really hardcore stuff in the members area. Entise the viewer into signing up for the site. Also, I'd suggest more info on exactly what they get with a membership - total pictures, amount of fresh content uploaded weekly, video, etc.
icq 169177917Comment
-
looks average, but its not badComment
-
i like it...Comment
-
looks really average and overdone to me.no sigComment
-
looks great, may not be that original but it's still a well designed site.Comment
-
Don't ask for opinions if you don't want to hear the truth, shitstain.Originally posted by ContentProducer
The site sucks. The girl is generic. The design is way fucking outdated. Deal with it, n00b.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeanCaptureI don't think he would mind some constructive criticism...yet you never offered any. How constructive is this..."Cookie Cutter looks like its from 1999"? That's not fucking constructive criticism asswipe! Constructive criticism is telling him how he could improve it - make it better - make it more appealing. If you don't like being called a hater...then keep you fucking mouth shut. Any questions hater?
OK rock on "Player"
Comment
Comment