Do you have the rights from Playboy to use the bernola twins images on your site?

Why do you like whoring your name out so much? =))

BTW, I never liked Ron Levi, but I paid $50k for high rollers software that made me millions.

Brad,

Why did god bless me with such good looks?

LOL that reminded me about the whole "bad list" of email addresses Brad Shaw bough from KB long time ago, and he kept bitching about it on and on and on..lol (it was even posted here)

It has nothing to do with webmaster support!

Okay...So you sell the source...

How would you know if a sponsor was cheating?

At this point I feel better trusing NATS programs as they don't sell the source...So how can someone modify it to shave?

You say you would kill a license of a shaver...But if they can completely lock you out...How would you know they were shaving?

Isn't the point of all these new admin programs is to prevent cheating on the programs from webmasters and give some confidence to the webmasters using the sponsors? As we all know these days every fucken sponsor will rip ya in a heartbeat if they think they can...

So I've decided at this point to only use NATS sponsors...Tell me why I should use sponsors who use your software? As I don't feel as comfortable knowing they can modify the code...

Jon

Exactly what I was thinking when I see such claims being made.

IMO NATS is still over rated, and the "no shaving" feature is just a marketing ploy to heighten their existence and heighten such software.

I still believe in trust and strong relationships Vs fancy 3rd party software. :2 cents:

I am just trying to understand...As I am a programmer...How software companies can back up their claims on the webmaster side of things...If they are "Locked" out of the system once they buy the software...

Jon

We have checks and balances in place to watch for affiliates abusing the software (shaving). I will not go into specifics.

99% of the big pps programs use their own code, it is almost impossible to run a large program with the constraints of compiled code. If you really think NATS is shave proof and you only want to send your traffic there, I am not going to argue with your short sidedness.

The average webmaster really does not understand shaving. It is an easy excuse for a shitty sales day. I am not saying people do not shave, look at Perfection Cash, they got caught red handed.

Okay..My short sidedness? I'm fully listening to everything you have to say...You provide at a higher cost the full source code...Which enables them to do whatever they want...From a programmers side of view...What capabilities does your "checks and balances" have when someone can modify anything in the scripts?

I am not really getting a solid answer on this...I would like to be able to trust sponsors using your system...But so far your not providing me with the hard standing that I can...So I will have to rely on using sponsors that have straight biller stats?

So your software is mainly just to provide affiliate programs with fraud protection...Nothing to protect webmasters from fraud? I figured with all these new fancy stats programs you would maybe look out for the industry as well?

Jon

We are upgrading to it. My program has gone nuts and the database and structure of my software is having more issues based on our growth. So I chose to use Executive Stats rather than continually upgrading my current software.

I must own the source code of my software, I feel I would be negligent not physically owning it.

If it sucks, you will hear about it.

Im hoping to be live with it next week.