they must be getting tired of tsorting through all the bullshit
Actually they claim its because relevancy is endangered by multiple ads coming up for the same exact domain. In reality they are fighting a 2 front battle, 1 against click fraud, and one against affiliate misconduct. They assume that this move will help both, I rather doubt it actually.
Nobody (well almost nobody) really knows how the new guidelines will look like, but I think landing pages will still be allowed, and if you're the only one who's advertising www.samplesite.com then you wouldn't have a problem too.
But if there are two Ads which link to www.samplesite.com for a keyphrase (worst case you and your sponsor) then someone will have to go, and I don't think that you can outbid your sponsor
Nobody (well almost nobody) really knows how the new guidelines will look like, but I think landing pages will still be allowed, and if you're the only one who's advertising www.samplesite.com then you wouldn't have a problem too.
But if there are two Ads which link to www.samplesite.com for a keyphrase (worst case you and your sponsor) then someone will have to go, and I don't think that you can outbid your sponsor
This is actually alot better then i expected. At one point it seemed that they were going to cut off affiliate bidding all together.
That is so obvious, even if google didnt force you to do it.
The funny thing about it is, all those "make millions at home" e-books about google adwords teach everyone to send straight to the link code. I would assume that 80% of affiliate bidders dont know any other way of sending traffic. Most likely have very little HTML knowledge if any.
This is actually alot better then i expected. At one point it seemed that they were going to cut off affiliate bidding all together.
I think that they're still going to cut off the affiliate, it would only have advantages for Google if they do so, less trademark troubles, better SE-Results and companies itself can spend more than affiliates. They only have to wait until the time is ready for it, but I'm pretty sure they'll make life harder and harder for Affiliates in the next few years.
I think that they're still going to cut off the affiliate, it would only have advantages for Google if they do so, less trademark troubles, better SE-Results and companies itself can spend more than affiliates. They only have to wait until the time is ready for it, but I'm pretty sure they'll make life harder and harder for Affiliates in the next few years.
How much can they do against feeders and FPA's thou. Its alot better to send traffic to a site that "sells" the product against sending it directly to the link code anyway. No offense to tour page designers, but those usually convert much better and carry more relevance. Would that still be considered affiliate bidding?
In a way it's good, i mean all those affiliate programs having a blast making their affiliates pay to send them traffic might actually have to fork money out of their own fat pockets instead.
In a way it's good, i mean all those affiliate programs having a blast making their affiliates pay to send them traffic might actually have to fork money out of their own fat pockets instead.
They are most likely going to cut off that as well. The main problem is that most of those ads are completely irrelevant.
Even if they cut the ebay affilitate crap like this with this new rule , you have a turn around to do EXACTLY the same thing legit after the new rule. No one is using it atm , because cost are high. But i can tell you, its the next way the big Ebay aff will use on Adwords if this new rule apply.
Comment