Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 12-23-2004, 03:24 PM   #1
Rhino22
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
I Pinged a popular host, and it shows 86.7 ms. Another host shows 36.7 ms. That means

I Pinged a bunch of sites hosted on a popular host, and it shows 86.7 ms. Another host shows 36.7 ms for the sites it hosts. Both of these hosts are comparable in prices, and supposedly have high quality NON-Cogent bandwidth. Does That means that the 36.7 ms host has better bandwidth? How much stock can I put into this?

This is the tool I used to ping these hosts:
http://www.alertsite.com/cgi-bin/tsite3.pl
Rhino22 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 03:42 PM   #2
Sami
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,047
try couple of diffrent places to ping from.
__________________

ServerProvider.com


ICQ#: 311-848-143
Sami is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 03:46 PM   #3
Chris
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: icq: 71462500 Skype: Jupzchris
Posts: 27,880
that is just from wherever that machine was located
they could be in the same state or something along those lines

i would not go with what there " ping " is lol
__________________
[email protected]
Chris is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 03:47 PM   #4
toddler
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,911
you need to go do some research on things like latency and the speed of light.
toddler is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 03:48 PM   #5
MrJackMeHoff
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LOLLIPOP ISLAND =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Posts: 4,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by JupZChris
that is just from wherever that machine was located
they could be in the same state or something along those lines

i would not go with what there " ping " is lol
Yeah ping has too much to do with distance and location.. Not a viable test.
__________________
MrJackMeHoff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 03:55 PM   #6
dubsix
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 363
I would be more concerned with troughput than ping... latency for web traffic isn't a real big deal, anything less than 120ms won't be noticeable to a user.
dubsix is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 03:58 PM   #7
Pornwolf
Drunk and Unruly
 
Pornwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 22,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by WireSix-Ryan
I would be more concerned with troughput than ping... latency for web traffic isn't a real big deal, anything less than 120ms won't be noticeable to a user.
Yup, what he said. Even Cogent is faster than Verio when you ping it from certain parts of the country.
__________________
I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

Webair, bitches.
Pornwolf is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 04:05 PM   #8
chodadog
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,736
You would have to ping from all the major cities around the US and compare averages to see which host has a better response time. But like someone already said, if it's under 120ms, the end user certainly won't notice any difference.
__________________
26 + 6 = 1
chodadog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 04:10 PM   #9
TheSwed
Confirmed User
 
TheSwed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden.
Posts: 3,483
If you want to know
http://www.traceroute.org/
TheSwed is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 04:53 PM   #10
Rhino22
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
ok, great guys, thank you very much for the help, this really claryfied some things for me.

So is there any online tools that I can use to find out which host is faster?
Rhino22 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 07:34 PM   #11
Rhino22
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
bump for the nightcrew
Rhino22 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 07:37 PM   #12
UniversalPassLorence
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Califonia
Posts: 3,721
It depends on the route at the time, also.
UniversalPassLorence is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 08:12 PM   #13
xclusive
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 35,218
Don't forget about packet loss...
__________________

I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


xclusive is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 08:22 PM   #14
Magg
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ICQ: 132497047
Posts: 4,467
Rhino -

Look, youre trying to target surfers right?

It seems as if you want the best host possible to support your traffic overall, so what you want is a host located in the CENTRAL USA.

Chicago, Dallas, Kansas, St. Louis

Those would be good places to start looking for a host. Otherwise youre going to keep getting mixed and unlikeable results. The host which pings or is faster to you, may be slow to everyone else.

Get something that you know will be good for the rest, find a host that is in the central of the US, as you seem to want to want the best available for your "SPECIFIC" purpose.

There is NO best for everyone, just a best for YOU.

Now, heres a list of providers I know in the central USA:

Reflected(CHI), ServerCentral(CHI), ThePlanet(DAL), CyberCon (STL), Xeolink(STL), and FoundryNAP (CHI).
Magg is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 09:39 PM   #15
Big Ray
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magg
Rhino -

Look, youre trying to target surfers right?

It seems as if you want the best host possible to support your traffic overall, so what you want is a host located in the CENTRAL USA.

Chicago, Dallas, Kansas, St. Louis

Those would be good places to start looking for a host. Otherwise youre going to keep getting mixed and unlikeable results. The host which pings or is faster to you, may be slow to everyone else.

Get something that you know will be good for the rest, find a host that is in the central of the US, as you seem to want to want the best available for your "SPECIFIC" purpose.

There is NO best for everyone, just a best for YOU.

Now, heres a list of providers I know in the central USA:

Reflected(CHI), ServerCentral(CHI), ThePlanet(DAL), CyberCon (STL), Xeolink(STL), and FoundryNAP (CHI).

That's one of the funniest posts I have ever read.
__________________

Five of the Top 10 Largest Programs Host with Jupiter. Find out why at http://www.jupiterhosting.com
Big Ray is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2004, 09:35 AM   #16
Rhino22
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Ray
That's one of the funniest posts I have ever read.
so is what he is saying off base?
Rhino22 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.