I Pinged a popular host, and it shows 86.7 ms. Another host shows 36.7 ms. That means

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rhino22
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2004
    • 2288

    #1

    I Pinged a popular host, and it shows 86.7 ms. Another host shows 36.7 ms. That means

    I Pinged a bunch of sites hosted on a popular host, and it shows 86.7 ms. Another host shows 36.7 ms for the sites it hosts. Both of these hosts are comparable in prices, and supposedly have high quality NON-Cogent bandwidth. Does That means that the 36.7 ms host has better bandwidth? How much stock can I put into this?

    This is the tool I used to ping these hosts:
    http://www.alertsite.com/cgi-bin/tsite3.pl
  • Sami
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2004
    • 2047

    #2
    try couple of diffrent places to ping from.

    ServerProvider.com


    ICQ#: 311-848-143

    Comment

    • Chris
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • May 2003
      • 27880

      #3
      that is just from wherever that machine was located
      they could be in the same state or something along those lines

      i would not go with what there " ping " is lol
      [email protected]

      Comment

      • toddler
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2002
        • 1911

        #4
        you need to go do some research on things like latency and the speed of light.
        http://www.flickr.com/photos/zoddler/

        Comment

        • MrJackMeHoff
          Confirmed User
          • Mar 2004
          • 4569

          #5
          Originally posted by JupZChris
          that is just from wherever that machine was located
          they could be in the same state or something along those lines

          i would not go with what there " ping " is lol
          Yeah ping has too much to do with distance and location.. Not a viable test.

          Comment

          • dubsix
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2004
            • 363

            #6
            I would be more concerned with troughput than ping... latency for web traffic isn't a real big deal, anything less than 120ms won't be noticeable to a user.

            Comment

            • Pornwolf
              Drunk and Unruly
              • Jan 2002
              • 22712

              #7
              Originally posted by WireSix-Ryan
              I would be more concerned with troughput than ping... latency for web traffic isn't a real big deal, anything less than 120ms won't be noticeable to a user.
              Yup, what he said. Even Cogent is faster than Verio when you ping it from certain parts of the country.
              I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

              Webair, bitches.

              Comment

              • chodadog
                Confirmed User
                • Apr 2002
                • 9736

                #8
                You would have to ping from all the major cities around the US and compare averages to see which host has a better response time. But like someone already said, if it's under 120ms, the end user certainly won't notice any difference.
                26 + 6 = 1

                Comment

                • TheSwed
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 3483

                  #9
                  If you want to know
                  http://www.traceroute.org/

                  Cheap Viagra and Cialis Erectionpills

                  Comment

                  • Rhino22
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 2288

                    #10
                    ok, great guys, thank you very much for the help, this really claryfied some things for me.

                    So is there any online tools that I can use to find out which host is faster?

                    Comment

                    • Rhino22
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 2288

                      #11
                      bump for the nightcrew

                      Comment

                      • UniversalPassLorence
                        Confirmed User
                        • Dec 2004
                        • 3721

                        #12
                        It depends on the route at the time, also.


                        $25.00 PPS for $1.00 Trial

                        Making Webmasters Money Since 1997

                        ICQ: 305090349

                        Comment

                        • xclusive
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 35218

                          #13
                          Don't forget about packet loss...

                          I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


                          Comment

                          • Magg
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2004
                            • 4467

                            #14
                            Rhino -

                            Look, youre trying to target surfers right?

                            It seems as if you want the best host possible to support your traffic overall, so what you want is a host located in the CENTRAL USA.

                            Chicago, Dallas, Kansas, St. Louis

                            Those would be good places to start looking for a host. Otherwise youre going to keep getting mixed and unlikeable results. The host which pings or is faster to you, may be slow to everyone else.

                            Get something that you know will be good for the rest, find a host that is in the central of the US, as you seem to want to want the best available for your "SPECIFIC" purpose.

                            There is NO best for everyone, just a best for YOU.

                            Now, heres a list of providers I know in the central USA:

                            Reflected(CHI), ServerCentral(CHI), ThePlanet(DAL), CyberCon (STL), Xeolink(STL), and FoundryNAP (CHI).

                            Comment

                            • Big Ray
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2003
                              • 464

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Magg
                              Rhino -

                              Look, youre trying to target surfers right?

                              It seems as if you want the best host possible to support your traffic overall, so what you want is a host located in the CENTRAL USA.

                              Chicago, Dallas, Kansas, St. Louis

                              Those would be good places to start looking for a host. Otherwise youre going to keep getting mixed and unlikeable results. The host which pings or is faster to you, may be slow to everyone else.

                              Get something that you know will be good for the rest, find a host that is in the central of the US, as you seem to want to want the best available for your "SPECIFIC" purpose.

                              There is NO best for everyone, just a best for YOU.

                              Now, heres a list of providers I know in the central USA:

                              Reflected(CHI), ServerCentral(CHI), ThePlanet(DAL), CyberCon (STL), Xeolink(STL), and FoundryNAP (CHI).

                              That's one of the funniest posts I have ever read.

                              Five of the Top 10 Largest Programs Host with Jupiter. Find out why at http://www.jupiterhosting.com

                              Comment

                              • Rhino22
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jan 2004
                                • 2288

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Big Ray
                                That's one of the funniest posts I have ever read.
                                so is what he is saying off base?

                                Comment

                                Working...