![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
|
I Pinged a popular host, and it shows 86.7 ms. Another host shows 36.7 ms. That means
I Pinged a bunch of sites hosted on a popular host, and it shows 86.7 ms. Another host shows 36.7 ms for the sites it hosts. Both of these hosts are comparable in prices, and supposedly have high quality NON-Cogent bandwidth. Does That means that the 36.7 ms host has better bandwidth? How much stock can I put into this?
This is the tool I used to ping these hosts: http://www.alertsite.com/cgi-bin/tsite3.pl |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,047
|
try couple of diffrent places to ping from.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: icq: 71462500 Skype: Jupzchris
Posts: 27,880
|
that is just from wherever that machine was located
they could be in the same state or something along those lines i would not go with what there " ping " is lol
__________________
[email protected] |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,911
|
you need to go do some research on things like latency and the speed of light.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zoddler/ |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LOLLIPOP ISLAND =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Posts: 4,569
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 363
|
I would be more concerned with troughput than ping... latency for web traffic isn't a real big deal, anything less than 120ms won't be noticeable to a user.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Drunk and Unruly
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 22,712
|
Quote:
__________________
I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade... Webair, bitches. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,736
|
You would have to ping from all the major cities around the US and compare averages to see which host has a better response time. But like someone already said, if it's under 120ms, the end user certainly won't notice any difference.
__________________
26 + 6 = 1 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden.
Posts: 3,483
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
|
ok, great guys, thank you very much for the help, this really claryfied some things for me.
So is there any online tools that I can use to find out which host is faster? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
|
bump for the nightcrew
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Califonia
Posts: 3,721
|
It depends on the route at the time, also.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 35,218
|
Don't forget about packet loss...
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ICQ: 132497047
Posts: 4,467
|
Rhino -
Look, youre trying to target surfers right? It seems as if you want the best host possible to support your traffic overall, so what you want is a host located in the CENTRAL USA. Chicago, Dallas, Kansas, St. Louis Those would be good places to start looking for a host. Otherwise youre going to keep getting mixed and unlikeable results. The host which pings or is faster to you, may be slow to everyone else. Get something that you know will be good for the rest, find a host that is in the central of the US, as you seem to want to want the best available for your "SPECIFIC" purpose. There is NO best for everyone, just a best for YOU. Now, heres a list of providers I know in the central USA: Reflected(CHI), ServerCentral(CHI), ThePlanet(DAL), CyberCon (STL), Xeolink(STL), and FoundryNAP (CHI). |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
That's one of the funniest posts I have ever read.
__________________
![]() ![]() Five of the Top 10 Largest Programs Host with Jupiter. Find out why at http://www.jupiterhosting.com |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |