Sexual activity at young ages. (12-13-14)

[Paraskass]

I would just like to let all you stupid fuckers who responded to Bdjuf's post saying girls are getting sluttier and sluttier because they are having sex at 14 or 13 are just plain retarded.

The only reason you think it's wrong is because society told you it was.

#1 a woman can be fertile at 13 or 14 even younger in some cases.

#2 saying it's getting worse is retarted considering women used to be married off to 40 year old men when they we're 12 and 13 in the 1700's and 1800's

you suck cocks

[wes]

i lost it when I was 15... but was fucking around when I was like 10.

[Paraskass]

Originally posted by wes
i lost it when I was 15... but was fucking around when I was like 10.

you fucking slut

1 at 10

255 at 20

[lil2rich4u2]

isnt wrong in a scientific way, its wrong in a SICK way

why would anyone want to fuck a 13yr old girl?

ok they might be READY to be fucked, but so are dogs

[AaronM]

I didn't even bother reading that other thread.

When I was 13 I wished I was not a virgin....Hell...I still wish I was not a virgin.

Anyway.......When I was 13, I was in the 8th grade. There's a reason that they taught sex-ed and we knew about condoms back then.

Your kids will be sexually active at that age. Get over it and learn how to be a good parent.

[Paraskass]

Originally posted by lil2rich4u2
isnt wrong in a scientific way, its wrong in a SICK way

why would anyone want to fuck a 13yr old girl?

ok they might be READY to be fucked, but so are dogs

why the fuck is it wrong for a 14 year old to fuck a 13 year old.

explain that to me?

[Paraskass]

Originally posted by AaronM
I didn't even bother reading that other thread.

When I was 13 I wished I was not a virgin....Hell...I still wish I was not a virgin.

Anyway.......When I was 13, I was in the 8th grade. There's a reason that they tought sex-ed and we knew about condoms back then.

Your kids will be sexually active at that age. Get over it and learn how to be a good parent.

exactly

I think the people acting surprised are the retards.

it's normal to be sexually active at a young age.

[mal]

i lost my virginity to a 15 year old girl when i was 12

[TheFrog]

its wrong, thats for sure

[boner 2.0]

Originally posted by Paraskass
you fucking slut

1 at 10

255 at 20

Those stats seems familiar

[flipGee]

Originally posted by Paraskass
I would just like to let all you stupid fuckers who responded to Bdjuf's post saying girls are getting sluttier and sluttier because they are having sex at 14 or 13 are just plain retarded.

The only reason you think it's wrong is because society told you it was.

#1 a woman can be fertile at 13 or 14 even younger in some cases.

#2 saying it's getting worse is retarted considering women used to be married off to 40 year old men when they we're 12 and 13 in the 1700's and 1800's

you suck cocks

[Paraskass]

Originally posted by TheFrog
its wrong, thats for sure

please explain to me why it is wrong for 2 13 year olds to be fucking?

[Kard63]

Paraskass's mom got knocked up with him when she was 13 and workin the corner so cut him some slack.

[Holly]

Originally posted by Paraskass
exactly

I think the people acting surprised are the retards.

it's normal to be sexually active at a young age.

It happens, yes, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's "normal". As a matter of fact, I'd even say it's not. There is a lot of emotional and contraceptive responsibility that goes along with having sex. Most 13-14 year olds aren't prepared for that, on either count. If you're not old enough to get a job and support a kid, then you're not old enough to be having sex, imo.

I was 13 or 14 when I got my first kiss at my best friend's birthday party. I'll never forget how shocked I was when he stuck his tongue in my mouth. I had NO clue that was coming.

[V_RocKs]

Well it is wrong because of societies inability to prepare a child for the rigors of preparing their own children. Back in the 1700's kids worked at about 10 years and up. So after 3 years of working a kid might have a sense of what to do with their money and how to take care of themselves. If dad died a 13 year old could assume his role and rear his siblings while holding down a steady job.

Kids today can't even get to school without some kind of proding. They can't take care of their pets properly so rearing a child is pretty much out of the question. They are protected from everything and taught to fear normal social situations like saying hello to someone you don't know out of respect. The current state of society isn't because of more killers and criminals being out there, it is because of people like George Bush who put fear into everyones hearts. Think about it. Why do you need George Bush and not John Kerry? Because Bush made you affraid that Vietnam would happen all over again if you changed presidents during a war. And now you know why we are in IRAQ.

[Paraskass]

Originally posted by V_RocKs
Well it is wrong because of societies inability to prepare a child for the rigors of preparing their own children. Back in the 1700's kids worked at about 10 years and up. So after 3 years of working a kid might have a sense of what to do with their money and how to take care of themselves. If dad died a 13 year old could assume his role and rear his siblings while holding down a steady job.

Kids today can't even get to school without some kind of proding. They can't take care of their pets properly so rearing a child is pretty much out of the question. They are protected from everything and taught to fear normal social situations like saying hello to someone you don't know out of respect. The current state of society isn't because of more killers and criminals being out there, it is because of people like George Bush who put fear into everyones hearts. Think about it. Why do you need George Bush and not John Kerry? Because Bush made you affraid that Vietnam would happen all over again if you changed presidents during a war. And now you know why we are in IRAQ.

BRAVO..

[rannor080]

try to do things like that in an early age.

[ArikaAmes]

You have to think....like I was a freshman in high school when I was 14 and even part of my sophmore year. If a HOT senior guy is in the picture....come on now!

I agree in Bdjufs thread...5 individuals is a lot at the age of 14, for a boy or girl, but to each their own, no one can judge him/her until they actually know him/her and what she/he has experienced.

[kowntafit]

I don't see the big deal.

[iFliPcEss]

Originally posted by wes
i lost it when I was 15... but was fucking around when I was like 10.

hu-wow i am speechless

[Libertine]

Originally posted by Holly
It happens, yes, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's "normal". As a matter of fact, I'd even say it's not. There is a lot of emotional and contraceptive responsibility that goes along with having sex. Most 13-14 year olds aren't prepared for that, on either count. If you're not old enough to get a job and support a kid, then you're not old enough to be having sex, imo.

I was 13 or 14 when I got my first kiss at my best friend's birthday party. I'll never forget how shocked I was when he stuck his tongue in my mouth. I had NO clue that was coming.

Actually, it is normal. A decade ago, 23% of 14 year olds and 30% of 15 year olds in the US had had sexual intercourse. [1] Since "normal" is typically defined by the behaviour of people, one must conclude that it is, in fact, normal. Whether it is wise or not is ofcourse a different matter.

I can't help but disagree with your statement that one should not have sex unless one is able to "get a job and support a kid". I'm 22, and like most of my friends I sure as hell am not ready to raise a kid yet. Does that mean I shouldn't be having sex? Or does it simply mean that I should be practicing safe sex?
The latter sounds like the more logical choice to me.

Now, what you seem to be arguing is that teens aren't able to handle the responsibility of contraception. But why not? With good education and guidance, it isn't exactly rocket science.

One has to be open to reality though... when I was 14 and had my first real girlfriend, my mother bought me my first pack of condoms, and in my teens I've dated and fucked many 13, 14 and 15 year old girls who, with their parents' knowledge, were on the pill. We never had any problems with pregnancies and stds and other icky stuff, because we knew what we should do and shouldn't do.
Kids aren't idiots. They just need the right information, and they'll be able to make the right choices. If parents deny reality though, and don't educate their kids, that's when shit goes wrong.

The country I live in is extremely open towards sex, yet has one of the lowest teen pregnancy rates in the world. Personally, I don't think that's a coincidence

[1] Alan Guttmacher Institute (1994). Sex and America's Teenagers. New York, NY: Alan Guttmacher Institute.

[Nicky]

I lost it when I was 15, girl was alos 15, cant be anything wrong with that......