Why is nofx posting picture of dead children?

[David!]

What the fuck is wrong with that piece of shit nofx?

[Juicy D. Links]

i missed it where is it?

[Kard63]

A while back he posted tons of dead jews in holocaust pics. I wish he were banned. I dont feel that way about anyone else.

[polish_aristocrat]

Originally posted by juicylinks
i missed it where is it?

he's the biggest troll here, he posted like 20 Holocaut pictures of death Jews in a thread few weeks ago, and now he starts this shit, i hope he either gets banned or dies

[polish_aristocrat]

Originally posted by juicylinks
i missed it where is it?

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...adid=392497&s=

see also the top of page 2 of that thread

[nofx]

so people can post pictures of dead soldiers, dead people, vids of cats being set on fire, and any other orgish/rotten.com type shit but people cannot post pictures of dead children? give me a fucking break. what makes them exempt?

this is the pic i posted btw, hardly graphic



you are such a whiny baby...

[Spunky]

I would complain to his sponsor if it bothers you that much

[iwantchixx]

Originally posted by nofx
so people can post pictures of dead soldiers, dead people, vids of cats being set on fire, and any other orgish/rotten.com type shit but people cannot post pictures of dead children? give me a fucking break. what makes them exempt?

this is the pic i posted btw, hardly graphic



you are such a whiny baby...

that's someone's child. do you always use someone else's heartache to get attention? You seriously need a beating in the worst kind of way.

[nofx]

Originally posted by iwantchixx
that's someone's child. do you always use someone else's heartache to get attention? You seriously need a beating in the worst kind of way.

your logic doesnt make any sense.

that dead soldier was someones child, maybe even had children/family of his/her own.
that cat that was set on fire, was at one point someones pet perhaps.
the people who have been decapitated in iraq are all important people to someone.

I didnt see you or anyone else lashing out at anyone who posted those.

[SmutGiant]

Originally posted by spunky
I would complain to his sponsor if it bothers you that much

Umm... that imo would be crossing the line. Sure Most of you people including myself don't agree with his statements but he's entitled to express his opinions, there is no reason whatsoever for a sponsor to withhold payments because he might have hurt people's feelings.

[iwantchixx]

Originally posted by nofx
your logic doesnt make any sense.

that dead soldier was someones child, maybe even had children/family of his/her own.
that cat that was set on fire, was at one point someones pet perhaps.
the people who have been decapitated in iraq are all important people to someone.

I didnt see you or anyone else lashing out at anyone who posted those.

you werent looking then. I did lash out about people who posted those. don't assume I was one who condoned those.

[candyflip]

Pictures of dead children have been posted here before.

I think KRL and FletchXXX had some the other day.

Does that change your opinion of them too? Or are you just another hypocrite?

[JayJay]

Originally posted by iwantchixx
you werent looking then. I did lash out about people who posted those. don't assume I was one who condoned those.

So did 80% Of GFY, Remember the Cat Burning Thread

[nofx]

Originally posted by iwantchixx
you werent looking then. I did lash out about people who posted those. don't assume I was one who condoned those.

well ok then, what makes a dead baby thread any different those those stated above?

[JayJay]

Originally posted by candyflip
Pictures of dead children have been posted here before.

I think KRL and FletchXXX had some the other day.

Does that change your opinion of them too? Or are you just another hypocrite?

It don't matter who the fuck it is...

If Lensman himself posted pics/threads like this he would get the same reaction

[iwantchixx]

Originally posted by nofx
well ok then, what makes a dead baby thread any different those those stated above?

did I say it was any different? you're just as tasteless as they were.

Stop trying to twist it man.

[polish_aristocrat]

Originally posted by candyflip
Pictures of dead children have been posted here before.

I think KRL and FletchXXX had some the other day.

Does that change your opinion of them too? Or are you just another hypocrite?

Posting dead children from Iraq, is done in order to make a point in a discussion about international politics etc, and not just for fun.

But you both apparently can't see the difference.

[nofx]

hey PussyMan, did you actually start this thread to have discussion about this or are you just not going say anything and do the "follow the leader" type thing ?

[candyflip]

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
Posting dead children from Iraq, is done in order to make a point in a discussion about international politics etc, and not just for fun.

But you both apparently can't see the difference.

Thanks Sir Judge His Holy Honor Almighty polish_aristocrat.

Since you have spoken. I will take this as GFY law.

Porn webmasters trying to tell someone else what they can and can't say. Fucking brilliant.

"I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it."

[candyflip]

Originally posted by nofx
hey PussyMan, did you actually start this thread to have discussion about this or are you just not going say anything and do the "follow the leader" type thing ?

People who act strictly on emotion aren't able to have discussions.

[David!]

Originally posted by candyflip
People who act strictly on emotion aren't able to have discussions.

You got something to say tonite?
You're not busy ripping some code from someone?

[nofx]

Originally posted by candyflip
People who act strictly on emotion aren't able to have discussions.

guess not, nor argue a valid point back as to why they are acting like they are.

[polish_aristocrat]

Originally posted by candyflip
Thanks Sir Judge His Holy Honor Almighty polish_aristocrat.

Since you have spoken. I will take this as GFY law.

Porn webmasters trying to tell someone else what they can and can't say. Fucking brilliant.

"I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it."

man, I am not pretending to be making GFY laws, I am talking anout common sense and what that guy did is really the lowest thing.

From what I remember, back in the old days, even AaronM got banned for posting something about someone else's young child.

There are simply some things you don't say or don't make jokes about..and if you do, then you either risk getting banned..or even if you don't get banned, you lose the whole respect and possible business from other webmasters posting here.

EOT from my side, I will see these threads back tommorow.

[candyflip]

Originally posted by PussyMan
You got something to say tonite?
You're not busy ripping some code from someone?

Is that the best you've got? Come on man.

Let go of your emotions. Let it all out.

[David!]

Originally posted by candyflip
Is that the best you've got? Come on man.

Let go of your emotions. Let it all out.

Who made you a GFY mentor?

[candyflip]

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
man, I am not pretending to be making GFY laws, I am talking anout common sense and what that guy did is really the lowest thing.

From what I remember, back in the old days, even AaronM got banned for posting something about someone else's young child.

There are simply some things you don't say or don't make jokes about..and if you do, then you either risk getting banned..or even if you don't get banned, you lose the whole respect and possible business from other webmasters posting here.

EOT from my side, I will see these threads back tommorow.

He's not making fun of anyone specifically.

It's not a direct attack. It was a question, yeah an insensitive one.

But he has every right to post that as you do to respond.

That is my point. I don't agree with that he said, but I do think he has every right to say it.

Sorry. Most Americans still believe in real free speech.

[candyflip]

Originally posted by PussyMan
Who made you a GFY mentor?

Just padding my post count. Thanks for making it easy tonight.

[CET]

Originally posted by nofx
so people can post pictures of dead soldiers, dead people, vids of cats being set on fire, and any other orgish/rotten.com type shit but people cannot post pictures of dead children? give me a fucking break. what makes them exempt?

this is the pic i posted btw, hardly graphic

[Pic removed due to a total lack of taste on the part of a troll]

you are such a whiny baby...

Death porn is not cool, ever. Death is part of life, but that doesn't mean we should get off on someone else's demise.

[CET]

Originally posted by nofx
your logic doesnt make any sense.

that dead soldier was someones child, maybe even had children/family of his/her own.
that cat that was set on fire, was at one point someones pet perhaps.
the people who have been decapitated in iraq are all important people to someone.

I didnt see you or anyone else lashing out at anyone who posted those.

1. You weren't paying attention.

2. Babies are completely innocent and have not had the opportunity to even live.

3. If you genuinely want to ask a philosophical question, you can do it without being an ass. You're looking for attention and you're getting it in abundance. However, I for one am going to stop feeding this troll. Say hello to the ignore list of most of GFY.

[CET]

Originally posted by candyflip
People who act strictly on emotion aren't able to have discussions.

I don't mind discussing this issue, but that thread wasn't about having a discussion, it was about getting attention. nofx used child death porn to facilitate being an attention whore.

[nofx]

Originally posted by CET
I don't mind discussing this issue, but that thread wasn't about having a discussion, it was about getting attention. nofx used child death porn to facilitate being an attention whore.

Please show me where I used CHILD DEATH PORN ?

[CET]

Originally posted by candyflip
That is my point. I don't agree with that he said, but I do think he has every right to say it.

Sorry. Most Americans still believe in real free speech.

He has no right to say it. This is a privately owned board. The owner may censor anyone he likes for whatever reason. Freedom of speech, as it is written in The Constitution, is a limitation on government. I agree with the concept of freedom of speech, but that does not exist when you are in a place at someone else's permission. If you are in my house and you say something that offends me, I have the right to throw you out if I so desire.

[johnpr0n]

Dont fucking post that shit here, i am here to do business and i dont need to see that fucking shit.

[CET]

Originally posted by nofx
Please show me where I used CHILD DEATH PORN ?

Death porn: The usage of pictures or movies of those that are dead or meeting their demise as a source of amusement.

You used death porn that involved a child, thereore you showed "child death porn". You did it for no other reason then to get attention. You're an attention whore of the lowest degree. I'm done talking to you now, and in the future.

[KMR Stitch]

Bunch of idiot liberals in this thread.

[nofx]

Originally posted by CET
Death porn: The usage of pictures or movies of those that are dead or meeting their demise as a source of amusement.

You used death porn that involved a child, thereore you showed "child death porn". You did it for no other reason then to get attention. You're an attention whore of the lowest degree. I'm done talking to you now, and in the future.

but the term 'child death porn' if taken out of context, could make people think I posted some dead child porn or something, but whatever cet.

did I do it for attention or did i post it knowing that if I did, it would cause drama and make gfy go crazy...? hrmmm...

glad I could get you all riled up over nothing, toodles, I will miss not talking to you. ;]