If you start 5+ threads in an hour, you should be banned for 24 hours.

[Juggernaut]

If you start 5+ threads in an hour, you should be banned for 24 hours.

What do you think?

[crockett]

I totally agree, also if your user name is less than 1 month old you should be limited to starting 5 topics a day.

GFY can be a good place to screw off but some of these trolls push the limits a bit too far.

[pornJester]

100 posts to have thread starting privileges would be nice.

[Steen2]

I agree!

[mkx]

It's true that the threads here are 95% bs but I really don't mind filtering through it. Reading a couple bs threads a day keeps me laughing.

Also, if this forum was 95% non-bs / informational, I may have a nervous breakdown

[Jace]

Originally posted by raulph
It's true that the threads here are 95% bs but I really don't mind filtering through it. Reading a couple bs threads a day keeps me laughing.

Also, if this forum was 95% non-bs / informational, I may have a nervous breakdown

yup

[Doctor Dre]

Fucking right . Cannot agree more

[Bob Saget]

I disagree, die you newbie!

[steve90]

good idea but it will porbly never happen

[Basic_man]

Yeah, The Creator should be already banned !

[The Creator]

I DON'T AGREE FUCKTARDS

CAN'T YOU READ SELECTIVELY OR ARE YOU STILL IN 1ST GRADE?

WHAT THE FUCK YOUR IQ MUST BE IN THE NEGATIVE RANGE...

EAT MY HUMONGOUS COCK

I KEEP THE SITE ALIVE!

[WickedVenus]

I agree! This guy the way he types and the wording he is using (the creator) Sounds like Boobmaster. But at least boobmaster knows how to put his links in his thread il give him credit for that much!

[Juggernaut]

Originally posted by Basic_man
Yeah, The Creator should be already banned !

So far it's

The Creator
webmaster x


Who else?

[Jer]

I agree. Five threads in an hour is way more than enought.

[Manowar]

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
Fucking right . Cannot agree more

[Vitasoy]

Nice idea, I second this.

[Pete]

Ummm, no I disagree.

[Nysus]

All good ideas to increase QUALITY but GFY doesn't make money from quality, they make it from Quantity.

Matt

[Bob Saget]

mm


What do you think now?

[pornguy]

Originally posted by raulph
It's true that the threads here are 95% bs but I really don't mind filtering through it. Reading a couple bs threads a day keeps me laughing.

Also, if this forum was 95% non-bs / informational, I may have a nervous breakdown

I totally agree.
Let the people post whatever they want. If you don't want to read it, just don't click it!

[webmaster x]

Originally posted by pornJester
100 posts to have thread starting privileges would be nice.

that'a a cool suggestion. hot babe thread would have won.

[BV]

maybe even 5+ replies to different threads, lol

[mkx]

Originally posted by pornJester
100 posts to have thread starting privileges would be nice.

Then they will just fill useful threads with garbage for an hour or two until they reach 100 posts. Why let them get the hang of posting useless posts? I don't think it will work. Plus, forums make money on traffic. If most posts here had useful information, 95% of the traffic may disappear. Just my

[Jer]

Originally posted by Nysus
All good ideas to increase QUALITY but GFY doesn't make money from quality, they make it from Quantity.

Matt

3 out of 5 threads started in an hour would be useless anyway... no one serious starts more than 5 fucking threads in an hour. This wouldn't stop trolls to start threads, but they would have to wait to waste more storage space.

[Nysus]

Originally posted by Jer
3 out of 5 threads started in an hour would be useless anyway... no one serious starts more than 5 fucking threads in an hour. This wouldn't stop trolls to start threads, but they would have to wait to waste more storage space.

Yes, and it would let people find quality posts sooner / more often - which in the long run would keep people coming back more often.

Matt