The speed with which the jury convicted him means that the verdict must be guilty. This isn't a jury angry about racial issues, and he obviously did it.
Most people would be surprised to learn that people who commit murder are usually convicted on circumstantial evidence, usually much thinner than in this case.
Looks like things won't be working out for Scott afterall, but he may go free while on apeal and skip the country yet.
Originally posted by DonovanPhillips I don't think there is enough concrete evidence to convict him. For the integrity of our legal system I think he must be found not guilty.
Innocent until proven guilty.
I don't think guilt has been proven.
41 reasons for the police to think he did it....
80 miles away from there house, he goes fishing, and the same bay they find his wife and there un born baby right by where he was fishing? hmmm
If he gets off, he will be killed very quickly, and that is what he really deserves, our legal system sucks dick....
Bring a high profile lawyer on, and get off like OJ....
a) Who goes fishing in the Bay. (It's fucking dirty water)
b) Who goes fishing on Christmas in the bay?
c) Who's dead wife turns up in the same body of water in which the innocent husband went fishing?
I think it was probably an accident... He was beating the shit out of her and "accidentally" threw her ass down the stairs and killed her.. then he decided to cover it up.
Guilty - Life in Prison.
Jupiter Hosting, Inc.
Vice President, Business Development
kc (AT) jupiterhosting.com
i personally think the guy is guilty as hell but i but i have a nasty feeling it will end up with a hung jury proving one more time that our judicial system needs an enema
Originally posted by MikeHawk 80 miles away from there house, he goes fishing, and the same bay they find his wife and there un born baby right by where he was fishing? hmmm
That is the easiest argument to refute. The bodies weren't found for months after the entire world knew where he went fishing. It would be easy to plant a body in that area if a person was trying to frame him.
And why in the world would he tell police where he went fishing if he took his wife there to dump her body? I know I'd personally want them as far away from the site as possible.
Do I think he's guilty? He probably is... but I don't think "beyond a reasonable doubt" has been accomplished. I have some pretty reasonable doubts.
Comment