Lie Detector or Jury ? Time For A Revolution!!! - GoFuckYourself.com

mahoney · 11-10-2004, 12:57 AM

Lie Detector or Jury ?

Don't you think the lie detector has less of an error margin then a jury ? Look at Oj ?

Imagine the utopia no more courts, no more juries no more scott Peterson, Michael jackson Oj, martha Stewart etc etc,

It makes me sick when I think of the tax dollars spent on this BS

Society really needs to focus on the perfection of the lie detector and start shutting down these Jonny Cockeran Type defense attorneys

If you were innocent the first thing you would do is take a lie detector test. It's so retarded that it's not looked upon as valid evidence

am i wrong ? AM I WRONG ?

xNetworx · 11-10-2004, 01:28 AM

Then how would rich criminals get away with shit?... it will never happen

reynold · 11-10-2004, 09:15 AM

you can't trust lie detectors they could be rigged

Doctor Dre · 11-10-2004, 09:15 AM

Thing is that thoses things aren't 100 % accurate and can be cheated if you know how to control your pulse

loverboy · 11-10-2004, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
Thing is that thoses things aren't 100 % accurate and can be cheated if you know how to control your pulse

so true

dcortez · 11-10-2004, 10:04 AM

Well, ummm... I have only one thing to say about technology and authority:

Voting machines and Nov/2/2004

mahoney · 11-10-2004, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by reynold
you can't trust lie detectors they could be rigged

Yeah but that's why I'm saying we should focus on the technology
to perfect it. I also think we should have porfessional jurors instead of the jack ass in front of you in traffic. We pay them $50,000 a year and if they are ever caught being corrupt we give them life in prison.

MattO · 11-10-2004, 12:31 PM

Lie detectors are bullshit pseudoscience

SmokeyTheBear · 11-10-2004, 12:34 PM

You dont even need to control your pulse..

Heres a little method that i have seen with my own eyes..

Put a thumbtack in your shoe..

everyone has a diff pulse etc so the examiner has to ask base questions to get an example of what yours looks like by comparing known lies to known truths.

Just step on the tack hard for truth and half as hard for a lie..

It will fool them everytime

SmokeyTheBear · 11-10-2004, 12:35 PM

Jailhouse lor is that you can do it with your sphincter

mahoney · 11-10-2004, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
Lie detectors are bullshit pseudoscience

Well the jury system blows a lie detector would have less of an error margin then a jury. GUARANTEED 100% The oj trial would have never happened because you would have just asked OJ one question. "Did you kill Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman" Yes or No Done move on ......next Millions of Dollars saved

Nader · 11-10-2004, 12:50 PM

Lie dectectors i think would be better than a bunch of morons in a room with stupid evidence!

TheLegacy · 11-10-2004, 12:50 PM

this would be a good time to shut up

TheLegacy · 11-10-2004, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mahoney
Lie Detector or Jury ?

Don't you think the lie detector has less of an error margin then a jury ? Look at Oj ?

Imagine the utopia no more courts, no more juries no more scott Peterson, Michael jackson Oj, martha Stewart etc etc,

It makes me sick when I think of the tax dollars spent on this BS

Society really needs to focus on the perfection of the lie detector and start shutting down these Jonny Cockeran Type defense attorneys

If you were innocent the first thing you would do is take a lie detector test. It's so retarded that it's not looked upon as valid evidence

am i wrong ? AM I WRONG ?

okay,, I'll speak up now.. lie detectors are not 100%, now be willing to take sodium pentathol and be asked questions and you have something.

right now the only people I would love to see take that test is IBill

jmk · 11-10-2004, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dcortez
Well, ummm... I have only one thing to say about technology and authority:

Voting machines and Nov/2/2004

LOL

mookienow · 11-10-2004, 01:12 PM

Lie dectectors are easily fooled.

11-10-2004, 12:57 AM	#1
mahoney Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Las Vegas Nv Posts: 5,318	Lie Detector or Jury ? Time For A Revolution!!! Lie Detector or Jury ? Don't you think the lie detector has less of an error margin then a jury ? Look at Oj ? Imagine the utopia no more courts, no more juries no more scott Peterson, Michael jackson Oj, martha Stewart etc etc, It makes me sick when I think of the tax dollars spent on this BS Society really needs to focus on the perfection of the lie detector and start shutting down these Jonny Cockeran Type defense attorneys If you were innocent the first thing you would do is take a lie detector test. It's so retarded that it's not looked upon as valid evidence am i wrong ? AM I WRONG ? __________________ Vegassexparty.com Last edited by mahoney; 11-10-2004 at 12:59 AM..

11-10-2004, 12:34 PM	#9
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	You dont even need to control your pulse.. Heres a little method that i have seen with my own eyes.. Put a thumbtack in your shoe.. everyone has a diff pulse etc so the examiner has to ask base questions to get an example of what yours looks like by comparing known lies to known truths. Just step on the tack hard for truth and half as hard for a lie.. It will fool them everytime __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

11-10-2004, 12:35 PM	#10
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	Jailhouse lor is that you can do it with your sphincter __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

11-10-2004, 12:50 PM	#13
TheLegacy SEO Connoisseur Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Brantford, Ontario Posts: 17,111	this would be a good time to shut up __________________ SEO Connoisseur Microsoft Teams: Robert Warren SEO Telegram: @TheLegacy54 RobertWarrenSEO.com

11-10-2004, 01:28 AM	#2
xNetworx So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Whore Island Posts: 14,445	Then how would rich criminals get away with shit?... it will never happen

11-10-2004, 09:15 AM	#3
reynold Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Global Traveler Posts: 51,271	you can't trust lie detectors they could be rigged

11-10-2004, 10:04 AM	#6
dcortez DINO CORTEZ™ Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Vancouver Island Posts: 2,145	Well, ummm... I have only one thing to say about technology and authority: Voting machines and Nov/2/2004

11-10-2004, 12:31 PM	#8
MattO The O is for Oohhh Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AUSTIN TEJAS Posts: 10,861	Lie detectors are bullshit pseudoscience

11-10-2004, 12:50 PM	#12
Nader Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 5,086	Lie dectectors i think would be better than a bunch of morons in a room with stupid evidence!

11-10-2004, 01:12 PM	#16
mookienow Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sunny Sunny Seattle Posts: 987	Lie dectectors are easily fooled.