| trouserrat |
11-10-2004 03:09 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by charly
I've been looking at a lot of these review sites recwently and very disappointed in what I found.
They all review the number of images, videos, content and quality. Speed of download, layout, site navigation, prices, exclusive content, etc.
But few of them actually review the porno aspect of the site.
The number one reason a surfer hands over $30 a month to a paysite is to jerk off. To review a paysite and not include this element in the review make it mostly useless to the surfer. It's like a restaurant critic not telling us about the taste of the food or a film critic commenting on how interesting a movie is.
The surfer wants to know the following, will the site get his dick hard, will it rip him off. The rest is add on information.
Now if the excuse is "Porn is to wide a subject to grade" or "It will appeal to someone" think of a reviewer in another industry gfiving that excuse. "Someone will enjoy eating it so we will not comment on the taste"
Reviewers. Look at the suitability of the images to the niche, if you do not understand the niche, don't review it. Look to see how fuckable the models are, how much they look like they are enjoying themselves, how much it makes you think you could of joined in. In other words how hard it will make the surfers dick.
Do this and give the other info and surfers will return to read what you advise and will take your recommendations.
|
No, because the "porn aspect" you refer to is very subjective (as is how "fuckable" someone is) and should not be the main focus of a review. I may review a BBW site and think the girl is gross, so I definitely wouldn't say "this girl will make your dick hard". However, another guy might check that out and say, "wow, that chick's hot, I love 'em big!". Someone may find Meat Members stuff to be repulsive, other guys might get instant wood. I see plenty of reviews written where it's so obvious that the guy writing the review simply personally likes the girl (looks wise), so the review is good. Other times, it's clear he does not like the girl, so the review's bad. I've seen some reviews where they complain about softcore sites having no hardcore. That's like complaining a no-nude site has no nudity. Or a hardcore POV porn site has no glamour photos. Ridiculous. Reviews should give the facts of the site in as much detail as possible and although you can indicate "this girl looks like she's really enjoying herself" or "wow, this chick looks very bored" and give your own opinion to some extent, you can't define for someone else what they will or will not find erotic or arousing. |
