Mathmatical Improbability - GoFuckYourself.com

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:00 AM

ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES SUSPECT.........
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES PRODUCED BY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS...........
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES ARE A FRAUD...........
REPUBLICANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY WIN OVER DEMOCRATS BY GAINING 18,181 VOTES.........
TEXAS REPUBLICANS DANNY SCHEEL, CARTER CASTEEL and JEFF WENTWORTH ALL RECIEVED EXACTLY THE SAME NUMBER OF VOTES - 18,181............
TIME TO WAKE UP...........
THE CHANCES OF ALL THREE GETTING THE EXACT SAME NUMBER OF VOTES IS ON THE ORDER OF MILLIONS TO ONE - YET THE CORPORATE MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT THIS FACT..........
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE..............
TURNS OUT THAT MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN CANDICE MILLER BEAT HER DEMOCRATIC OPPONENT - SHE GOT 18,181 VOTES.....HMMMMM.....AND REPUBLICAN MICHAEL SMIGIEL FROM MARYLAND BEAT HIS CHALLENGER - CAN YOU GUESS HOW MANY VOTES HE GOT? YOU GUESSED IT - 18,181........

eroswebmaster · 11-04-2004, 01:02 AM

dude you serious? You got links? If that's true that's seriously fucked up.

Pornweaver · 11-04-2004, 01:02 AM

Source?

Doctor Dre · 11-04-2004, 01:02 AM

Hrmm post cnn screenshots with numbers matching plz ... I'm lost

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pornweaver
Source?

Learn for yourself and wake the fuck up.

Doctor Dre · 11-04-2004, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
Learn for yourself and wake the fuck up.

Dude when you learn something you wanna double check on something this important

titmowse · 11-04-2004, 01:06 AM

i found the links. you just gotta google "18,181 votes". but aren't all these elections from 2002?

Doctor Dre · 11-04-2004, 01:08 AM

Looks like it was in 2k2

Pornweaver · 11-04-2004, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
Learn for yourself and wake the fuck up.

Calm down little lady... What the fuck is the point of posting this thread? Are you trying to spread the word or are you trying to come across as Holier than Thou?

In case #1... Links to support your findings will only help further your cause.

In case #2... I can't help you there.

Anyhow, for the rest of you who are interested in this topic, here are some links:

http://www.bushpresident2004.com/rep...-electrons.htm
http://www.opednews.com/hartmann_the...ust_a_chip.htm
http://www.govsux.com/vote_scam_archive.htm
http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/4642/1/197/

There's alot more on Google:
http://www.google.com/search?q=18,18... start=10&sa=N

SmokeyTheBear · 11-04-2004, 01:11 AM

This is not a blockbuster revelation, just a little daydreaming...
I'm a computer programmer and a sort of amateur mathematician, so
I'm always adding and subtracting and multiplying and dividing
numbers to pass the time.
Especially when I'm sitting on the stationary bike at the gym,
hoping and praying that the time will go by quicker. If the timer
is set for 10 minutes, I start counting down the fractions,
thinking: at 1:00 I'm 10% done, at 2:00 I'm 20% done, etc. When I'm
20% done, that's one fifth, but even better, I can tell myself I
just have to do what I did *four* more times. "One-fifth" doesn't
sound as good as "four more times".
What's the point of all this? The point is, when you're starting
from a round number (a multiple of ten, say, like 10 or 100 or
1000), and you chop off a tenth or you add on a tenth, you end up
with math problems involving numbers one away from 10 - ninths or
elevenths. When you start off with a nice round number and you chop
off or tack on a fraction, you no longer have that nice round
number to work with anymore - the original nice round number is
bigger or smaller by that fraction, and all your previous fractions
are out of whack now.
A typical situation is where you bump up a number by 10%, like when
you go from 100 to 110. Now if you've used up 10 units of that,
you're looking at 1/11, not 1/10.
OK, so what's your point? My point is that ninths and elevenths
come up a lot when you're starting with a multiple of ten and
bumping it up or down by 10% - something we do in a lot of
situations.
When you write out 1/11 as a decimal, you get 0.09090909... which
looks really cool. The fraction 2/11 looks like 0.1818181818...
which also looks pretty cool.
Which brings us to the mysterious electoral number 18,181 which
crops up in so many suspicious elections in Texas. Some people have
ventured an explanation by noticing that a=1 and h=8 in the
alphabet, giving "ahaha".
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00064.htm
I think there's might be a more mathematical way of looking at
this. 18,181 is 200,000/11 (if you truncate it, instead of rounding
it. Rounding would give 18,181.81 = 18,182 - but let's just assume
Republican hackers are too stupid to know that rule about rounding
up when it's over a half, and they just truncate all the time.)
That, in my opinion, is what's so special about 18,181. It's not a
weird number because it's a palindrome or because it maps to ahaha
- it's an important number because it results when you're dividing
a nice round number by 11 - a situation that often happens when
you're incrementing or decrementing some starting number by 10%.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by titmowse
i found the links. you just gotta google "18,181 votes". but aren't all these elections from 2002?

Study the patterns.
Look at the results.

Your right.
GOogle it.

DANNY SCHEEL 18,181

WickedVenus · 11-04-2004, 01:12 AM

i searched its talking about votes that were made in 2000 were counted in this years election. It was all rigged and its seriously fucked up..

SilverTab · 11-04-2004, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
This is not a blockbuster revelation, just a little daydreaming...
I'm a computer programmer and a sort of amateur mathematician, so
I'm always adding and subtracting and multiplying and dividing
numbers to pass the time.
Especially when I'm sitting on the stationary bike at the gym,
hoping and praying that the time will go by quicker. If the timer
is set for 10 minutes, I start counting down the fractions,
thinking: at 1:00 I'm 10% done, at 2:00 I'm 20% done, etc. When I'm
20% done, that's one fifth, but even better, I can tell myself I
just have to do what I did *four* more times. "One-fifth" doesn't
sound as good as "four more times".
What's the point of all this? The point is, when you're starting
from a round number (a multiple of ten, say, like 10 or 100 or
1000), and you chop off a tenth or you add on a tenth, you end up
with math problems involving numbers one away from 10 - ninths or
elevenths. When you start off with a nice round number and you chop
off or tack on a fraction, you no longer have that nice round
number to work with anymore - the original nice round number is
bigger or smaller by that fraction, and all your previous fractions
are out of whack now.
A typical situation is where you bump up a number by 10%, like when
you go from 100 to 110. Now if you've used up 10 units of that,
you're looking at 1/11, not 1/10.
OK, so what's your point? My point is that ninths and elevenths
come up a lot when you're starting with a multiple of ten and
bumping it up or down by 10% - something we do in a lot of
situations.
When you write out 1/11 as a decimal, you get 0.09090909... which
looks really cool. The fraction 2/11 looks like 0.1818181818...
which also looks pretty cool.
Which brings us to the mysterious electoral number 18,181 which
crops up in so many suspicious elections in Texas. Some people have
ventured an explanation by noticing that a=1 and h=8 in the
alphabet, giving "ahaha".
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00064.htm
I think there's might be a more mathematical way of looking at
this. 18,181 is 200,000/11 (if you truncate it, instead of rounding
it. Rounding would give 18,181.81 = 18,182 - but let's just assume
Republican hackers are too stupid to know that rule about rounding
up when it's over a half, and they just truncate all the time.)
That, in my opinion, is what's so special about 18,181. It's not a
weird number because it's a palindrome or because it maps to ahaha
- it's an important number because it results when you're dividing
a nice round number by 11 - a situation that often happens when
you're incrementing or decrementing some starting number by 10%.

I tought you were coming up with that stuff LOL

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:16 AM

Most people can not handle it.

SlutFinder · 11-04-2004, 01:18 AM

SmokeyTheBear · 11-04-2004, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SilverTab
I tought you were coming up with that stuff LOL

i wish i had that much free time.. lol

SmokeyTheBear · 11-04-2004, 01:23 AM

I think people forget that the exit polls were very close to the results so unless they rigged the exit polls ..

Doctor Dre · 11-04-2004, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
I think people forget that the exit polls were very close to the results so unless they rigged the exit polls ..

Any1 got a net link to control that ? not controlled by medias ?

Pornweaver · 11-04-2004, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
YOU GUESSED IT - 18,181........

Conversion to alphabet: 18181 18181 18181 ahaha ahaha ahaha

WickedVenus · 11-04-2004, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
I think people forget that the exit polls were very close to the results so unless they rigged the exit polls ..

they did change the exit polls it was on the front page of yahoo news yesterday.

this is something similar to it but it doesnt really tell the story that way on yahoo yesterday

http://www.oaklandtribune.com/Storie...509904,00.html

NetRodent · 11-04-2004, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
Most people can not handle it.

This sounds like a job for the tinfoil hat squad.

titmowse · 11-04-2004, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
Most people can not handle it.

don't get me wrong. i smell a rat. but it's gonna take a while to oh, how would a cowboy say it...smoke em out?

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:32 AM

Evidence Of Prior Conduct

It is a recorded fact that every system of balloting established in America has been gamed and rigged. I.E. America's political practitioners have a very long history of ballot rigging and vote tampering. This is nothing new and evidence of the sort we have uncovered has been long predicted by computer scientists such as Dr Rebecca Mercuri.

In more recent history investigative Journalist Greg Palast has documented in detail Katherine Harris's use of electronic data matching technologies to disenfranchise thousands of Florida voters in advance of the 2000 Presidential election.

We highly recommend readers purchase a copy of "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" by Greg Palast to read much more about this.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00064.htm

Doctor Dre · 11-04-2004, 01:34 AM

"It was really different from what we'd seen and it laid a foundation for the evening's coverage that was based on a flawed model," said Nicolle Devenish, Bush's campaign communications director. "The coverage that ensued was 'Bush team worried; Kerry team giddy.' The coverage of that was based on a falsehood."

--

that's what the want you to beleive

titmowse · 11-04-2004, 01:37 AM

if ya'll are interested in helping the cause:

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=node/view/1013

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:37 AM

I should get a tinfoil hat. Maybe they actually help question authority better.

Maybe it would help me find better way's to wake you dumb fuckers up.

V_RocKs · 11-04-2004, 01:41 AM

Of course this all supposedly happened in 2002, so who cares, it is yesteryears news.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by V_RocKs
Of course this all supposedly happened in 2002, so who cares, it is yesteryears news.

Are you nice and warm in your comfort zone?

goBigtime · 11-04-2004, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
This is not a blockbuster revelation, just a little daydreaming...

Very nice

V_RocKs · 11-04-2004, 01:44 AM

Welcome to the dark side.

budz · 11-04-2004, 01:45 AM

V_RocKs · 11-04-2004, 01:50 AM

Don't listen to them, they are weak.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 11-04-2004, 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by V_RocKs

Don't listen to them, they are weak.

Awright...

I guess thats enough for them in one night.

Not to kool to scare the children I know...

reynold · 11-04-2004, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES SUSPECT.........
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES PRODUCED BY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS...........
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES ARE A FRAUD...........
REPUBLICANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY WIN OVER DEMOCRATS BY GAINING 18,181 VOTES.........
TEXAS REPUBLICANS DANNY SCHEEL, CARTER CASTEEL and JEFF WENTWORTH ALL RECIEVED EXACTLY THE SAME NUMBER OF VOTES - 18,181............
TIME TO WAKE UP...........
THE CHANCES OF ALL THREE GETTING THE EXACT SAME NUMBER OF VOTES IS ON THE ORDER OF MILLIONS TO ONE - YET THE CORPORATE MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT THIS FACT..........
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE..............
TURNS OUT THAT MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN CANDICE MILLER BEAT HER DEMOCRATIC OPPONENT - SHE GOT 18,181 VOTES.....HMMMMM.....AND REPUBLICAN MICHAEL SMIGIEL FROM MARYLAND BEAT HIS CHALLENGER - CAN YOU GUESS HOW MANY VOTES HE GOT? YOU GUESSED IT - 18,181........

ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES has bush microchip.

Harmon · 11-04-2004, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
This is not a blockbuster revelation, just a little daydreaming...
I'm a computer programmer and a sort of amateur mathematician, so
I'm always adding and subtracting and multiplying and dividing
numbers to pass the time.
Especially when I'm sitting on the stationary bike at the gym,
hoping and praying that the time will go by quicker. If the timer
is set for 10 minutes, I start counting down the fractions,
thinking: at 1:00 I'm 10% done, at 2:00 I'm 20% done, etc. When I'm
20% done, that's one fifth, but even better, I can tell myself I
just have to do what I did *four* more times. "One-fifth" doesn't
sound as good as "four more times".
What's the point of all this? The point is, when you're starting
from a round number (a multiple of ten, say, like 10 or 100 or
1000), and you chop off a tenth or you add on a tenth, you end up
with math problems involving numbers one away from 10 - ninths or
elevenths. When you start off with a nice round number and you chop
off or tack on a fraction, you no longer have that nice round
number to work with anymore - the original nice round number is
bigger or smaller by that fraction, and all your previous fractions
are out of whack now.
A typical situation is where you bump up a number by 10%, like when
you go from 100 to 110. Now if you've used up 10 units of that,
you're looking at 1/11, not 1/10.
OK, so what's your point? My point is that ninths and elevenths
come up a lot when you're starting with a multiple of ten and
bumping it up or down by 10% - something we do in a lot of
situations.
When you write out 1/11 as a decimal, you get 0.09090909... which
looks really cool. The fraction 2/11 looks like 0.1818181818...
which also looks pretty cool.
Which brings us to the mysterious electoral number 18,181 which
crops up in so many suspicious elections in Texas. Some people have
ventured an explanation by noticing that a=1 and h=8 in the
alphabet, giving "ahaha".
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00064.htm
I think there's might be a more mathematical way of looking at
this. 18,181 is 200,000/11 (if you truncate it, instead of rounding
it. Rounding would give 18,181.81 = 18,182 - but let's just assume
Republican hackers are too stupid to know that rule about rounding
up when it's over a half, and they just truncate all the time.)
That, in my opinion, is what's so special about 18,181. It's not a
weird number because it's a palindrome or because it maps to ahaha
- it's an important number because it results when you're dividing
a nice round number by 11 - a situation that often happens when
you're incrementing or decrementing some starting number by 10%.

God you fried my brain there for a bit but thanks for the intellectual read

tranza · 11-04-2004, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by budz

GoodChris · 11-04-2004, 12:00 PM

How else would W get more votes than any other president in history?

I like the hahahaha theory.

Doctor Dre · 11-04-2004, 04:53 PM

ezrydn · 11-04-2004, 05:31 PM

Boo - FUCKING - hoo!!!

Pornweaver · 11-05-2004, 01:46 AM

trouserrat · 11-05-2004, 01:54 AM

Attention Earth. This is Mars. Prepare your tinfoil hats and secret decoder rings for the following transmission. Set decoder rings to "Idiot Conspiracy Theory #346.8754". Over.

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES SUSPECT.........
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES PRODUCED BY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS...........
ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES ARE A FRAUD...........
REPUBLICANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY WIN OVER DEMOCRATS BY GAINING 18,181 VOTES.........
TEXAS REPUBLICANS DANNY SCHEEL, CARTER CASTEEL and JEFF WENTWORTH ALL RECIEVED EXACTLY THE SAME NUMBER OF VOTES - 18,181............
TIME TO WAKE UP...........
THE CHANCES OF ALL THREE GETTING THE EXACT SAME NUMBER OF VOTES IS ON THE ORDER OF MILLIONS TO ONE - YET THE CORPORATE MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT THIS FACT..........
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE..............
TURNS OUT THAT MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN CANDICE MILLER BEAT HER DEMOCRATIC OPPONENT - SHE GOT 18,181 VOTES.....HMMMMM.....AND REPUBLICAN MICHAEL SMIGIEL FROM MARYLAND BEAT HIS CHALLENGER - CAN YOU GUESS HOW MANY VOTES HE GOT? YOU GUESSED IT - 18,181........

WickedVenus · 11-05-2004, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by trouserrat
Attention Earth. This is Mars. Prepare your tinfoil hats and secret decoder rings for the following transmission. Set decoder rings to "Idiot Conspiracy Theory #346.8754". Over.

its not a conspiracy lol there is actual proof

Shoehorn! · 11-05-2004, 01:58 AM

When will people understand that votes from the people don't matter? Who cares if everyone in the country voted for Nader, he didn't win. Kerry didn't win. Bush won. Get over it. The electoral college decides who is going to be the president, not you, not me, not the American people.

MrJackMeHoff · 11-05-2004, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheSmutPeddlerDOTcom
When will people understand that votes from the people don't matter? Who cares if everyone in the country voted for Nader, he didn't win. Kerry didn't win. Bush won. Get over it. The electoral college decides who is going to be the president, not you, not me, not the American people.

Well for what its worth the electoral college is voted by the people so actually it kinda is the people.. Anyway he won both ways so it doesnt matter..

WickedVenus · 11-05-2004, 02:03 AM

11-04-2004, 01:06 AM	#7
titmowse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: TEXAS Posts: 5,320	i found the links. you just gotta google "18,181 votes". but aren't all these elections from 2002? __________________ I still love everybody

11-04-2004, 01:11 AM	#10
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	This is not a blockbuster revelation, just a little daydreaming... I'm a computer programmer and a sort of amateur mathematician, so I'm always adding and subtracting and multiplying and dividing numbers to pass the time. Especially when I'm sitting on the stationary bike at the gym, hoping and praying that the time will go by quicker. If the timer is set for 10 minutes, I start counting down the fractions, thinking: at 1:00 I'm 10% done, at 2:00 I'm 20% done, etc. When I'm 20% done, that's one fifth, but even better, I can tell myself I just have to do what I did four more times. "One-fifth" doesn't sound as good as "four more times". What's the point of all this? The point is, when you're starting from a round number (a multiple of ten, say, like 10 or 100 or 1000), and you chop off a tenth or you add on a tenth, you end up with math problems involving numbers one away from 10 - ninths or elevenths. When you start off with a nice round number and you chop off or tack on a fraction, you no longer have that nice round number to work with anymore - the original nice round number is bigger or smaller by that fraction, and all your previous fractions are out of whack now. A typical situation is where you bump up a number by 10%, like when you go from 100 to 110. Now if you've used up 10 units of that, you're looking at 1/11, not 1/10. OK, so what's your point? My point is that ninths and elevenths come up a lot when you're starting with a multiple of ten and bumping it up or down by 10% - something we do in a lot of situations. When you write out 1/11 as a decimal, you get 0.09090909... which looks really cool. The fraction 2/11 looks like 0.1818181818... which also looks pretty cool. Which brings us to the mysterious electoral number 18,181 which crops up in so many suspicious elections in Texas. Some people have ventured an explanation by noticing that a=1 and h=8 in the alphabet, giving "ahaha". http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00064.htm I think there's might be a more mathematical way of looking at this. 18,181 is 200,000/11 (if you truncate it, instead of rounding it. Rounding would give 18,181.81 = 18,182 - but let's just assume Republican hackers are too stupid to know that rule about rounding up when it's over a half, and they just truncate all the time.) That, in my opinion, is what's so special about 18,181. It's not a weird number because it's a palindrome or because it maps to ahaha - it's an important number because it results when you're dividing a nice round number by 11 - a situation that often happens when you're incrementing or decrementing some starting number by 10%. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

11-04-2004, 01:12 AM	#12
WickedVenus Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: ICQ: 309691342 ---- Yahoo Messenger: wickedvenus_acv Posts: 3,877	i searched its talking about votes that were made in 2000 were counted in this years election. It was all rigged and its seriously fucked up.. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.

11-04-2004, 01:16 AM	#14
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	Most people can not handle it. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

11-04-2004, 01:18 AM	#15
SlutFinder Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: UK Posts: 2,273	__________________ Legit mailing and optin databases - Adult,Casino&Pharmacy. ICQ: 272-745-001 - EMail:[email protected] Adult payments allowed! on your site or between webmasters! www.YowCow.com

11-04-2004, 01:00 AM	#1
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	Mathmatical Improbability ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES SUSPECT......... ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES PRODUCED BY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS........... ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES ARE A FRAUD........... REPUBLICANS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY WIN OVER DEMOCRATS BY GAINING 18,181 VOTES......... TEXAS REPUBLICANS DANNY SCHEEL, CARTER CASTEEL and JEFF WENTWORTH ALL RECIEVED EXACTLY THE SAME NUMBER OF VOTES - 18,181............ TIME TO WAKE UP........... THE CHANCES OF ALL THREE GETTING THE EXACT SAME NUMBER OF VOTES IS ON THE ORDER OF MILLIONS TO ONE - YET THE CORPORATE MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT THIS FACT.......... BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE.............. TURNS OUT THAT MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN CANDICE MILLER BEAT HER DEMOCRATIC OPPONENT - SHE GOT 18,181 VOTES.....HMMMMM.....AND REPUBLICAN MICHAEL SMIGIEL FROM MARYLAND BEAT HIS CHALLENGER - CAN YOU GUESS HOW MANY VOTES HE GOT? YOU GUESSED IT - 18,181........ __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

11-04-2004, 01:02 AM	#2
eroswebmaster March 1st, 2003 Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Seat 4 @ Venetian Poker Room Posts: 20,295	dude you serious? You got links? If that's true that's seriously fucked up. __________________ For rent - ICQ 127-027-910 Click here for more details

11-04-2004, 01:02 AM	#3
Pornweaver Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 855	Source?

11-04-2004, 01:23 AM	#17
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	I think people forget that the exit polls were very close to the results so unless they rigged the exit polls .. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

11-04-2004, 01:32 AM	#23
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	Evidence Of Prior Conduct It is a recorded fact that every system of balloting established in America has been gamed and rigged. I.E. America's political practitioners have a very long history of ballot rigging and vote tampering. This is nothing new and evidence of the sort we have uncovered has been long predicted by computer scientists such as Dr Rebecca Mercuri. In more recent history investigative Journalist Greg Palast has documented in detail Katherine Harris's use of electronic data matching technologies to disenfranchise thousands of Florida voters in advance of the 2000 Presidential election. We highly recommend readers purchase a copy of "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" by Greg Palast to read much more about this. http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00064.htm __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

11-04-2004, 01:37 AM	#25
titmowse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: TEXAS Posts: 5,320	if ya'll are interested in helping the cause: http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=node/view/1013 __________________ I still love everybody

11-04-2004, 01:41 AM	#27
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,422	Of course this all supposedly happened in 2002, so who cares, it is yesteryears news.

11-04-2004, 01:44 AM	#30
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,422	Welcome to the dark side.

11-04-2004, 01:45 AM	#31
budz Disruptive Innovator Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Vegas Posts: 4,230	__________________ C:\Code\ C:\Code\Run\

11-04-2004, 01:50 AM	#32
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,422	Don't listen to them, they are weak.

11-04-2004, 12:00 PM	#37
GoodChris Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 454	How else would W get more votes than any other president in history? I like the hahahaha theory. __________________ Make Money with METHOD CASH - 100% ASIAN SITES - EXCLUSIVE AND HIGH QUALITY [email protected]

11-04-2004, 05:31 PM	#39
ezrydn Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Guadalajara, MX Posts: 695	Boo - FUCKING - hoo!!!

11-05-2004, 01:46 AM	#40
Pornweaver Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 855

11-05-2004, 01:58 AM	#43
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	When will people understand that votes from the people don't matter? Who cares if everyone in the country voted for Nader, he didn't win. Kerry didn't win. Bush won. Get over it. The electoral college decides who is going to be the president, not you, not me, not the American people. __________________

11-05-2004, 02:03 AM	#45
WickedVenus Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: ICQ: 309691342 ---- Yahoo Messenger: wickedvenus_acv Posts: 3,877	__________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.